The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This is the problem:
It is the intention of the majority of people on the forums to keep good standards. If you post ludicrous drivel then you ENCOURAGE those standards to decline. Before you know it people like khazar will be swearing and fighting and the whole place will disintegrate into a mess.
That's why I said I would never run another competition like WASSUP WABBIT.
When I get to work today I will delete whole threads full of spam. I don't want to spend my time doing this. I have better things to do.
The only one place where spam is tolerated at present are the worlds longest thread attempts. If necessary we will take those down too.
Argumentative factions are certainly not welcome on this site if they go beyond an acceptable level of banter. This would not be allowed even in the worlds longest threads.
People of all ages are welcome here. If we cannot control the forums then they will be protected by installing qualification. Then anybody could be barred from the main forums if they degrade the place, until they work their way back up to qualification.
Would everybody here please accept that good standards must be achieved across the board in order for the forums to remain an enjoyable place.
It is the intention of the majority of people on the forums to keep good standards. If you post ludicrous drivel then you ENCOURAGE those standards to decline. Before you know it people like khazar will be swearing and fighting and the whole place will disintegrate into a mess.
That's why I said I would never run another competition like WASSUP WABBIT.
When I get to work today I will delete whole threads full of spam. I don't want to spend my time doing this. I have better things to do.
The only one place where spam is tolerated at present are the worlds longest thread attempts. If necessary we will take those down too.
Argumentative factions are certainly not welcome on this site if they go beyond an acceptable level of banter. This would not be allowed even in the worlds longest threads.
People of all ages are welcome here. If we cannot control the forums then they will be protected by installing qualification. Then anybody could be barred from the main forums if they degrade the place, until they work their way back up to qualification.
Would everybody here please accept that good standards must be achieved across the board in order for the forums to remain an enjoyable place.
Page:
I was very offended TN...
I had no option but read the f-word....
Im going to report you..... write a topic to get you banned.... and I wont let it rest!
Yeah right..... what kinda person would do that?! :-)
I had no option but read the f-word....
Im going to report you..... write a topic to get you banned.... and I wont let it rest!
Yeah right..... what kinda person would do that?! :-)
SnoopDoggyDan wrote:
> BAN TURBONUTTER!!!!
> (only joking....)
> (were you last night...?)
Yes. Long story short:
Low on bandwidth, downloading, didn't have time to fart about being nice. It did the job, end of story.
> BAN TURBONUTTER!!!!
> (only joking....)
> (were you last night...?)
Yes. Long story short:
Low on bandwidth, downloading, didn't have time to fart about being nice. It did the job, end of story.
Dav1d wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
> I had nothing to do with the NRA. I was
> just included, not involved.
> Do you think youre gods gift or
> something?
> Cant you just admit to doing wrong like the rest of us
> had to?
> I was just included, not involved! Thats the biggest load
> of spam ive ever heard!
Dav1d, what is your problem?
I can't possibly have been involved with the NRA. I wasn't even here for God's sake! All that happened was I was invited into a conversation with Ortega and Dringo where I mainly typed. ummmms and OKs. I logged on at 3 the next day, briefly, and I find the place in tatters! I didn't even do the tagline thing!
You show me one piece of evidence that I was involved with the NRA thing and I will retract me defence.
> Turbonutter wrote:
> I had nothing to do with the NRA. I was
> just included, not involved.
> Do you think youre gods gift or
> something?
> Cant you just admit to doing wrong like the rest of us
> had to?
> I was just included, not involved! Thats the biggest load
> of spam ive ever heard!
Dav1d, what is your problem?
I can't possibly have been involved with the NRA. I wasn't even here for God's sake! All that happened was I was invited into a conversation with Ortega and Dringo where I mainly typed. ummmms and OKs. I logged on at 3 the next day, briefly, and I find the place in tatters! I didn't even do the tagline thing!
You show me one piece of evidence that I was involved with the NRA thing and I will retract me defence.
see it doesnt work!
now u believe me TONY!
now u believe me TONY!
Holy mackrel!
WARNING! THIS IS A SWEAR FILTER TEST!
Do not read below here if the f-word offends you!
Last warning
I'm going to post it soon
Here goes:
f**k.
Do not read below here if the f-word offends you!
Last warning
I'm going to post it soon
Here goes:
f**k.
oh, sorry i must have had the wrong information.
Turbonutter wrote:
> I had nothing to do with the NRA. I was just included, not involved.
Do you think youre gods gift or something?
Cant you just admit to doing wrong like the rest of us had to?
I was just included, not involved! Thats the biggest load of spam ive ever heard!
> I had nothing to do with the NRA. I was just included, not involved.
Do you think youre gods gift or something?
Cant you just admit to doing wrong like the rest of us had to?
I was just included, not involved! Thats the biggest load of spam ive ever heard!
Page: