The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This is the problem:
It is the intention of the majority of people on the forums to keep good standards. If you post ludicrous drivel then you ENCOURAGE those standards to decline. Before you know it people like khazar will be swearing and fighting and the whole place will disintegrate into a mess.
That's why I said I would never run another competition like WASSUP WABBIT.
When I get to work today I will delete whole threads full of spam. I don't want to spend my time doing this. I have better things to do.
The only one place where spam is tolerated at present are the worlds longest thread attempts. If necessary we will take those down too.
Argumentative factions are certainly not welcome on this site if they go beyond an acceptable level of banter. This would not be allowed even in the worlds longest threads.
People of all ages are welcome here. If we cannot control the forums then they will be protected by installing qualification. Then anybody could be barred from the main forums if they degrade the place, until they work their way back up to qualification.
Would everybody here please accept that good standards must be achieved across the board in order for the forums to remain an enjoyable place.
It is the intention of the majority of people on the forums to keep good standards. If you post ludicrous drivel then you ENCOURAGE those standards to decline. Before you know it people like khazar will be swearing and fighting and the whole place will disintegrate into a mess.
That's why I said I would never run another competition like WASSUP WABBIT.
When I get to work today I will delete whole threads full of spam. I don't want to spend my time doing this. I have better things to do.
The only one place where spam is tolerated at present are the worlds longest thread attempts. If necessary we will take those down too.
Argumentative factions are certainly not welcome on this site if they go beyond an acceptable level of banter. This would not be allowed even in the worlds longest threads.
People of all ages are welcome here. If we cannot control the forums then they will be protected by installing qualification. Then anybody could be barred from the main forums if they degrade the place, until they work their way back up to qualification.
Would everybody here please accept that good standards must be achieved across the board in order for the forums to remain an enjoyable place.
Page:
Wouldn't put any money on it Tony.
(;o|
(;o|
I wonder if this lot will EVER stop arguing.
Oh look at you, your so great putting the blame on someone else. Your so wonderful I think you should be NOTable.
(;o|
(;o|
Time_Warp wrote:
> shaneo wrote:
I like Lex and Dav1 but it wasn't
>
> Turbobnutter's fault of the NRA. It was Sheepy and
> Dringo.
Sheepy?
Yes, Sheepy.
> shaneo wrote:
I like Lex and Dav1 but it wasn't
>
> Turbobnutter's fault of the NRA. It was Sheepy and
> Dringo.
Sheepy?
Yes, Sheepy.
Nearly Cruicial wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
> Dav1d wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
>
> I had nothing to do with
> the NRA. I was
> just included,
> not involved.
> Do you
> think youre gods gift or
>
> something?
> Cant you just
> admit to doing wrong like the
> rest of us
> had to?
> I was
> just included, not
> involved! Thats the biggest load
> of spam
> ive ever
> heard!
Dav1d, what is your problem?
I can't
> possibly
> have been involved with the NRA. I wasn't even here for
> God's
> sake! All that happened was I was invited into a conversation
>
> with Ortega and Dringo where I mainly typed. ummmms and OKs. I
>
> logged on at 3 the next day, briefly, and I find the place in
>
> tatters! I didn't even do the tagline thing!
You show me
> one
> piece of evidence that I was involved with the NRA thing
> and I will
> retract me defence.
Dav1d in one of the past
> topics you were picking at a fight with Quazimodo, now you are
> picking one with Turbonutter. Everytime it's alway's you, the TSQ
> thing you wrote about the SPAMMING HQ. You and Lexus were the two
> people who seemed to lead people on, and what for-A bit of
> attention. Well boy o boy you've got it about 6 topic's worth of
> 10000 word's. I don't know how you can say that you would not write
> a thread about turbonutter to get him banned because your not that
> kinda guy, well your not your WORSE. Just get a life before your
> reputation starts dropping drastically, and stick to the rule's.
> And one more thing Turbonutter had nothing to do with the NRA, like
> he said and most of us can recall he was away.
I like Lex and Dav1 but it wasn't Turbobnutter's fault of the NRA. It was Sheepy and Dringo.
> Turbonutter wrote:
> Dav1d wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
>
> I had nothing to do with
> the NRA. I was
> just included,
> not involved.
> Do you
> think youre gods gift or
>
> something?
> Cant you just
> admit to doing wrong like the
> rest of us
> had to?
> I was
> just included, not
> involved! Thats the biggest load
> of spam
> ive ever
> heard!
Dav1d, what is your problem?
I can't
> possibly
> have been involved with the NRA. I wasn't even here for
> God's
> sake! All that happened was I was invited into a conversation
>
> with Ortega and Dringo where I mainly typed. ummmms and OKs. I
>
> logged on at 3 the next day, briefly, and I find the place in
>
> tatters! I didn't even do the tagline thing!
You show me
> one
> piece of evidence that I was involved with the NRA thing
> and I will
> retract me defence.
Dav1d in one of the past
> topics you were picking at a fight with Quazimodo, now you are
> picking one with Turbonutter. Everytime it's alway's you, the TSQ
> thing you wrote about the SPAMMING HQ. You and Lexus were the two
> people who seemed to lead people on, and what for-A bit of
> attention. Well boy o boy you've got it about 6 topic's worth of
> 10000 word's. I don't know how you can say that you would not write
> a thread about turbonutter to get him banned because your not that
> kinda guy, well your not your WORSE. Just get a life before your
> reputation starts dropping drastically, and stick to the rule's.
> And one more thing Turbonutter had nothing to do with the NRA, like
> he said and most of us can recall he was away.
I like Lex and Dav1 but it wasn't Turbobnutter's fault of the NRA. It was Sheepy and Dringo.
Turbonutter wrote:
> Dav1d wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
> I had nothing to do with
> the NRA. I was
> just included, not involved.
> Do you
> think youre gods gift or
> something?
> Cant you just
> admit to doing wrong like the rest of us
> had to?
> I was
> just included, not involved! Thats the biggest load
> of spam
> ive ever heard!
Dav1d, what is your problem?
I can't
> possibly have been involved with the NRA. I wasn't even here for
> God's sake! All that happened was I was invited into a conversation
> with Ortega and Dringo where I mainly typed. ummmms and OKs. I
> logged on at 3 the next day, briefly, and I find the place in
> tatters! I didn't even do the tagline thing!
You show me one
> piece of evidence that I was involved with the NRA thing and I will
> retract me defence.
Dav1d in one of the past topics you were picking at a fight with Quazimodo, now you are picking one with Turbonutter. Everytime it's alway's you, the TSQ thing you wrote about the SPAMMING HQ. You and Lexus were the two people who seemed to lead people on, and what for-A bit of attention. Well boy o boy you've got it about 6 topic's worth of 10000 word's. I don't know how you can say that you would not write a thread about turbonutter to get him banned because your not that kinda guy, well your not your WORSE. Just get a life before your reputation starts dropping drastically, and stick to the rule's. And one more thing Turbonutter had nothing to do with the NRA, like he said and most of us can recall he was away.
> Dav1d wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
> I had nothing to do with
> the NRA. I was
> just included, not involved.
> Do you
> think youre gods gift or
> something?
> Cant you just
> admit to doing wrong like the rest of us
> had to?
> I was
> just included, not involved! Thats the biggest load
> of spam
> ive ever heard!
Dav1d, what is your problem?
I can't
> possibly have been involved with the NRA. I wasn't even here for
> God's sake! All that happened was I was invited into a conversation
> with Ortega and Dringo where I mainly typed. ummmms and OKs. I
> logged on at 3 the next day, briefly, and I find the place in
> tatters! I didn't even do the tagline thing!
You show me one
> piece of evidence that I was involved with the NRA thing and I will
> retract me defence.
Dav1d in one of the past topics you were picking at a fight with Quazimodo, now you are picking one with Turbonutter. Everytime it's alway's you, the TSQ thing you wrote about the SPAMMING HQ. You and Lexus were the two people who seemed to lead people on, and what for-A bit of attention. Well boy o boy you've got it about 6 topic's worth of 10000 word's. I don't know how you can say that you would not write a thread about turbonutter to get him banned because your not that kinda guy, well your not your WORSE. Just get a life before your reputation starts dropping drastically, and stick to the rule's. And one more thing Turbonutter had nothing to do with the NRA, like he said and most of us can recall he was away.
Yes, that was because I could only load one page every minute or two and I didn't have the time to say:
"Please can you stop the spamming"
"Why?"
"Because it's annoying me"
"We don't want to stop it. Why should we listen to you?"
etc...
Saying I wanted them banned was the quickest and most effective way to get them to stop. Simple.
"Please can you stop the spamming"
"Why?"
"Because it's annoying me"
"We don't want to stop it. Why should we listen to you?"
etc...
Saying I wanted them banned was the quickest and most effective way to get them to stop. Simple.
still the topic did say...and i quote "tony please ban all the members of the TSQ"
Err, Dav1d, why can't you accept that my topic was not to get you banned. Tony was never going to ban you. He needs a big push to get over the edge.
Page: