The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
SFX has just posted the first 3 episode details from the new Doctor Who series for 2010.
Episode 1: "The Eleventh Hour" (by Steven Moffat) to be shown 3rd April 2010
Episode 2: "The Beast Below" (by Steven Moffat)
Episode 3: "Victory of the Daleks" (by Mark Gatiss)
Personally, I think Gatiss + Daleks = great episode.
Episode 1: "The Eleventh Hour" (by Steven Moffat) to be shown 3rd April 2010
Episode 2: "The Beast Below" (by Steven Moffat)
Episode 3: "Victory of the Daleks" (by Mark Gatiss)
Personally, I think Gatiss + Daleks = great episode.
Page:
I liked Saturday's episode but, yeah, wasn't as good as the set up.
Next week looks interesting and I think Amy's character is developing well, seems to be connected with the whole rip in time thing.
Most interesting thing is the Doctor going on about the past being able to be changed and replaced. What is he planning?
Next week looks interesting and I think Amy's character is developing well, seems to be connected with the whole rip in time thing.
Most interesting thing is the Doctor going on about the past being able to be changed and replaced. What is he planning?
Alfonse wrote:
> Also, Amy Pond, what a shlag.
I agree. Although, after watching that scene, she became infinitely more attractive and desirable.
> Don't even get me started on the part where the angels start
> moving.
Wasn't the whole 'stone skin' thing the angels way of protecting themselves from being looked upon/killed? This would explain the moving thing.
> Also, Amy Pond, what a shlag.
I agree. Although, after watching that scene, she became infinitely more attractive and desirable.
> Don't even get me started on the part where the angels start
> moving.
Wasn't the whole 'stone skin' thing the angels way of protecting themselves from being looked upon/killed? This would explain the moving thing.
Alfonse wrote:
> I didn't really think that episode lived up to the original
> angels episode
I've just finished watching it and I'd have to agree.
> I didn't really think that episode lived up to the original
> angels episode
I've just finished watching it and I'd have to agree.
So River Song is going to kill the Doctor. Interesting stuff.
Also, Amy Pond, what a shlag.
I didn't really think that episode lived up to the original angels episode, though I am looking forward to next week's episode.
Don't even get me started on the part where the angels start moving.
Also, Amy Pond, what a shlag.
I didn't really think that episode lived up to the original angels episode, though I am looking forward to next week's episode.
Don't even get me started on the part where the angels start moving.
I really enjoyed this week, much more than last anyway, and looking forward to the conclusion where it looks like we will find out more about the 'cracks'.
It seems to me that more people were worried about the attack from Graham Norton however, personally I didn't see it as I iPlayered it once I got back from t'pub but it seems like a lot of fuss over nothing. These people should try watching some Yank shows if they want to know irritation with these adverts.
It seems to me that more people were worried about the attack from Graham Norton however, personally I didn't see it as I iPlayered it once I got back from t'pub but it seems like a lot of fuss over nothing. These people should try watching some Yank shows if they want to know irritation with these adverts.
That was so dire compared to the first one, could have been the six white russians I drank though.
AMAZING! And the first one I watched when it first aired..
ooh, now that was better wasn't it? Weeping Angels, River Song still being cryptic and Amy showing some backbone.
Dr Who sure is a cash cow for the BBC huh?
Free Doctor Who audiobook read by Matt Smith in the Telegraph tomorrow and part 1 of Pest Control read by David Tennant in Sunday's paper.
Page: