Viewing Thread:
"Dringo's theory on the real future of gaming"

Remember when we all start out on the forums. We sat there and go "the future of gaming are VR machines". Yeah.... errr no. We know full well that they are just so many many many years away. Even after our life time perhaps.

But Nintendo knew the future is in trouble. Games machines are forever technically going forward. But not for much longer. Games are becoming more photo-realistic, even today's X-box, PS2 and Gamecube are possibly good enough. But the PS3, Xenon and N5 truly will be the final nail in console progressions coffin. So what next?

Well although consoles will struggle to go forward, that isn't strictly the case for handheld gaming.

That's when Sony went, "s**t, Nintendo can actually win this thing!"

You see after the N5 Nintendo can rest on the Gameboy. A franchise that can at last display as good graphics as home formats. The N-Gage and up-coming PSP prove it. With a small connection to the TV and you have a home console/handheld combo. Multiplayer will almost be totally done by online play... Gaming as we know it has changed.

So Sony have to enter the handheld market. Start to knock away some of Nintendo's monopoly. After all there is no guarentee Sony can beat Nintendo again. After all they are ready this time. But have Sony got it wrong?

The PSP is a brilliant piece of kit, MP3 player and video player combo. Genius idea. Plus the £200 price point proves this is an expensive gadget for the adults. Now tell me people, how many adults do you see with Gameboys?

According to Nintendo, with their new plan to see Gameboy to adults (with the SP), a few more than before. But Nintendo will still admitt, the Gameboy sells to children and hardcore gamers. Adults are few and far between. But Sony are different, for starters Playstation is a multi-million selling brand and all these extras are sure to tickle adult gamers fancy. A bit like Nokia, I mean with their brand name and a load of cool extras they would sure make a million selling handheld system...

Oh wait.

Well I'm sure with CD lasers and in built memory to store game data and MP3 abilities will not damage battery life at all. Well maybe, not that it matters I mean battery life doesn't affect the success of a handheld console at all. Just ask SEGA. Oh wait. Well that doesn't matter, it looks so cool with top graphics. They'll get a head start over Nintendo for sure, I mean it's not as if Nintendo plan to launch a handheld system just before the PSP. Oh wait. Well come on, Nintendo haven't learnt anything, I mean the SNES was just as popular as the GAmeboy franchise. Oh wait.

Yes from my standpoint I'm supposed to see it like this. But I'm also a casual consumer, despite the PSP looking hotter than Elisha Cutherbert I can't see a flock of eager people to buy this £200 handheld system. Not even I'd go for it, It's like those PALM computer thingy's, damn they are cool... but there is no way I'd ever get one.

Nintendo are not as stupid as they look. As the Gameboy starts to flag they buy into Pokemon and release a colour edition. Moments before Pokemon started to slide the GBA was launched. As Children became the main consumer of the product Nintendo released an adult edition. The SP. More expensive but damn cooler. Come the PSP launch the SP will suffer a long overdue but very good price cut. The PSP will be facing off against the words most popular console, both the adult SP and the normal childrens edition... at a fraction of the PSP's price.

Not to mention the fact that Nintendo are also getting a head start over the PSP with their own new fangled hand held device the DS. The DS could fail, but the idea could be cool enough to win over gamers hearts.

Sony are not going to walk over Nintendo this time. Nintendo are making sure of it. With a war going on between the DS and PSP for advertisement space you know the GBA will quietly move on by as the biggest selling system still. You just know, like Atari, like SEGA, Like Nokia... Sony could well be the next victim to the handheld massacure. Sure unlike those 3 Sony are a bigger threat. But, Nintendo are actually putting together a defence system this time... they've never done that before.

If the PSP falls will that be the end of the fear that Nintendo will falter? Yes. Nintendo will continue with their handheld dominance, and when and if they are finally forced out of the home console market... the power between the 2 divisions will be so minute... none of us will care.

Dringo - fanboy till the end.

True, and the Metroid multiplayer could be next on the list of stupid ideas.

But.. Metroid's conversion from 2D and 3rd Person to 3D and 1st Person went very well indeed.

Nintendo changing their popular franchises is more frequent and annoying now.

Mario - Stupid water jetpack thing
Zelda - Stupid graphics (I don't care if you like em, proper 3D worlds would have been better and you know it)
Final Fantasy (Okay not nintendos franchise but still) - Stupid battle system and you can only really play it if there's four of you and you're all rich

and so on..

More of the same if you ask me I mean Mario 64, Zelda OOT were two of the biggest and most popular games ever, it's like that old quote everyone uses if it's not broke then don't fix it!

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> A spelling mistake is a mistake, you learn from mistakes, or at least
> most normal people do.

Did you not learn that typing too fast occasionally causes spelling errors?

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> A spelling mistake is a mistake, you learn from mistakes, or at least
> most normal people do. Strangely enough I can spell and therefore I
> have nothing to learn from a structural point of view.

Then I hope you have learnt your lesson.

A spelling mistake is a mistake, you learn from mistakes, or at least most normal people do. Strangely enough I can spell and therefore I have nothing to learn from a structural point of view.

By the way are you an only child?

I'm sorry, I would communicate with you further, but you'd obviously rather do so with someone who actually knows how to construct something remotely *intersting*, unlike me.

Oh, and typing too fast or not, a spelling mistake is still a spelling mistake whether you're typing fast, slow, or backwards.

Thats called typing too fast, not a spelling mistake, It only picks them up if I hit return.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> I would rather communicate with someone who actually knows how to
> construct something remotely *intersting*, which incidently rules you
> out.

Your amazing spell-check wasn't working there was it? Heh :P
Anyway, no need to get your knickers in a twist, if you're wearing any you saucy minx you :)

I would rather communicate with someone who actually knows how to construct something remotely intersting, which incidently rules you out.

Suuure.. :D

You have yet to answer my other question anyway, you big fluffy hentai-tentacle lover you. ;)