The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
There is nothing solid yet but there was a huge discussion on the IGN boards people claiming they saw it on TV.
My sentiments go out to him.
Anyway, what if it was the first one? It's not revolutionary, it's just obvious. You've got the most powerful console ever created so you're not exactly going to make it in 2D, are you? It's not clever, just the most logical thing to do. If he didn't, he should have been shot.
That's not what I call revolutionary.
Metal Gear Solid... third person sneak em up... kinda like... Thief?
I suppose because it was the first time Mario had been seen in proper 3D and it was very good and new for it's time.
Can someone explain to me how Mario 64 was revolutonary by the way, as I can't really see why.
> Is it just me or does the fate of Nintendo rest on that man's
> shoulders?
I'm sure Rage will be pleased to hear you say that :)
Mario 64 was revolutional though, and I haven't seen one revolutional game from that Konami bloke of yours, Ant. :0)