The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Page:
Alfonse wrote:
> Iraq is a country that prefer dictators.
Conducted a poll of Iraqis have you?
> Iraq is a country that prefer dictators.
Conducted a poll of Iraqis have you?
Iraq is a country that prefer dictators. America are ruining many countries by "liberating them".
Garin wrote:
> Seifer wrote:
> But did the Iraqi people even want a democratic government?
>
> Well..do you think the Kurds and Shia (the majority of Iraq's
> population) enjoyed having no choice? Maybe the Kurds thought
> being victims of gas attacks was what they deserved?
Well why did they fight back? And still are?
> Seifer wrote:
> But did the Iraqi people even want a democratic government?
>
> Well..do you think the Kurds and Shia (the majority of Iraq's
> population) enjoyed having no choice? Maybe the Kurds thought
> being victims of gas attacks was what they deserved?
Well why did they fight back? And still are?
Is there a possibility Iraq will be split up into smaller countries? Wasn't Iraq part of a larger country in the past anyway?
Seifer wrote:
> But did the Iraqi people even want a democratic government?
Well..do you think the Kurds and Shia (the majority of Iraq's population) enjoyed having no choice? Maybe the Kurds thought being victims of gas attacks was what they deserved?
> But did the Iraqi people even want a democratic government?
Well..do you think the Kurds and Shia (the majority of Iraq's population) enjoyed having no choice? Maybe the Kurds thought being victims of gas attacks was what they deserved?
Garin wrote:
> Ahem...the point of a democratic government is that its people
> have a choice in leadership. Despite the current conditions in
> Iraq the current government is one its people got to vote on.
> This is far removed from Saddam Hussein's rise to power.
But did the Iraqi people even want a democratic government?
> Ahem...the point of a democratic government is that its people
> have a choice in leadership. Despite the current conditions in
> Iraq the current government is one its people got to vote on.
> This is far removed from Saddam Hussein's rise to power.
But did the Iraqi people even want a democratic government?
Sucks for him
Iraq was looking better before Saddam was captured IMO.
Seifer wrote:
> Aren't we contradicting ourselves by forcing Iraq to be a
> Democratic government? Surely thats the same kind of power that
> Suddam had over his people?
Ahem...the point of a democratic government is that its people have a choice in leadership. Despite the current conditions in Iraq the current government is one its people got to vote on.
This is far removed from Saddam Hussein's rise to power.
> Aren't we contradicting ourselves by forcing Iraq to be a
> Democratic government? Surely thats the same kind of power that
> Suddam had over his people?
Ahem...the point of a democratic government is that its people have a choice in leadership. Despite the current conditions in Iraq the current government is one its people got to vote on.
This is far removed from Saddam Hussein's rise to power.
I haven't really read anything about the trial itself, but in the end Saddam was going to be punished somehow for what he did to the country and the people...
Can't say I know the details of the trial, but surely it'd be impossible to get people who are 'neutral' to decide the outcome in this case...? Everyone in Iraq and people all over the world know who Saddam is and know about the crimes he has committed (or is alleged to have committed).
Can't say I know the details of the trial, but surely it'd be impossible to get people who are 'neutral' to decide the outcome in this case...? Everyone in Iraq and people all over the world know who Saddam is and know about the crimes he has committed (or is alleged to have committed).
Page: