The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Gaming for me is far too complicated, with story lines so far fetched that you’d be so tired out thinking what you actually had to do before you could even do it! That’s why simple games, have been, and will always, the greatest – Tetris anyone? Tetris is such a simplistic game we immediately got hooked to the game for many, many years. Why? Because all we had was one objective to do, gain points from creating lines of 2 or above with different shapes, today however in games like Perfect Dark we have multiple things to do in them however shooting people is as simple as creating lines until you increase the difficulty or for a fact in Tetris it is increasing the speed of the game!
When a game does stretch the boundaries of simplicity, it has to be darn good to be understood and succeed. I’m glad we keep seeing the return of Pac Man, Tetris and classic arcade games that were good for nothing else than fun, fast, and furious gaming. They made you think not to the extent that you collapse from over working the brain. So when people look and snarl at the GameCube- cringing at the thought of yet more Mario and Metrioid, I think to myself they’re the ones that will miss out! Mario is just one example of simple gaming that survives because it is brilliant- we all love it and we always will probably!
But sometimes games have to be not so simple if has to have a good lifespan.
Tetris lasted for years but Mario cannot last without a storyline at all, there would be no Bowser if it weren’t for complexity in Computer Games.
The storyline in Mario isn’t so complex at all, you have to collect the different stars, open the doors to new worlds and save the Princess from Bowser. The simplicity of the controls as well was so refreshing for a 3D platforming game. The idea is to mix simple gameplay with complex storylines because it’s what we like that in our games today. The demands for that was so low back then that Duke Nukem 3D was passed on as simply brilliant! Tetris had no storyline but simple gameplay so it was so easy to pick up and play. Pac Man had simple graphics and simple game play, plus different difficulties to lengthen the lifespan.
Today’s games don’t have what it takes to be a as simple as it because they aren’t so easy to pick and play for hours but the complexity of learning to adapt to the demands of the game makes it addictive.
If you’ve played Final Fantasy you will know what I mean.
At the end of the day, new games will always arrive-genre defying titles will come and go, some will be good some will be woeful. At least I will always have simplicity to fall back on.
When a game does stretch the boundaries of simplicity, it has to be darn good to be understood and succeed. I’m glad we keep seeing the return of Pac Man, Tetris and classic arcade games that were good for nothing else than fun, fast, and furious gaming. They made you think not to the extent that you collapse from over working the brain. So when people look and snarl at the GameCube- cringing at the thought of yet more Mario and Metrioid, I think to myself they’re the ones that will miss out! Mario is just one example of simple gaming that survives because it is brilliant- we all love it and we always will probably!
But sometimes games have to be not so simple if has to have a good lifespan.
Tetris lasted for years but Mario cannot last without a storyline at all, there would be no Bowser if it weren’t for complexity in Computer Games.
The storyline in Mario isn’t so complex at all, you have to collect the different stars, open the doors to new worlds and save the Princess from Bowser. The simplicity of the controls as well was so refreshing for a 3D platforming game. The idea is to mix simple gameplay with complex storylines because it’s what we like that in our games today. The demands for that was so low back then that Duke Nukem 3D was passed on as simply brilliant! Tetris had no storyline but simple gameplay so it was so easy to pick up and play. Pac Man had simple graphics and simple game play, plus different difficulties to lengthen the lifespan.
Today’s games don’t have what it takes to be a as simple as it because they aren’t so easy to pick and play for hours but the complexity of learning to adapt to the demands of the game makes it addictive.
If you’ve played Final Fantasy you will know what I mean.
At the end of the day, new games will always arrive-genre defying titles will come and go, some will be good some will be woeful. At least I will always have simplicity to fall back on.
Page:
I don't care if i'm a notable or nto, remember b4 then!
Sniper wrote:
> That's it i give up on these forums,
Don't go!
i'm the last person who can
> even win anymore, even they think Timewarp deserves it more than me,
A certain Des'ree song comes to mind
> i'm a s***e writer aren't i.
No
4 months of some hard work has never
> worked for me,
Again the Des'ree song
i've kept my cool but i've only really won twice
> through my own post i was proud to win through that but it seems SR
> don't appreciate what i can do now.
I'm sure they do and even if they don't, we do!
Twice is not good enough for me
> even though it is a free game,
It's not about the games!
i am amazed at how many times Grix
> and the others have won and look at me 2 wins and a notable.
Notable is more impressive than multiple GAD wins
> That's it i give up on these forums,
Don't go!
i'm the last person who can
> even win anymore, even they think Timewarp deserves it more than me,
A certain Des'ree song comes to mind
> i'm a s***e writer aren't i.
No
4 months of some hard work has never
> worked for me,
Again the Des'ree song
i've kept my cool but i've only really won twice
> through my own post i was proud to win through that but it seems SR
> don't appreciate what i can do now.
I'm sure they do and even if they don't, we do!
Twice is not good enough for me
> even though it is a free game,
It's not about the games!
i am amazed at how many times Grix
> and the others have won and look at me 2 wins and a notable.
Notable is more impressive than multiple GAD wins
I can understand where your coming from. I'm not a great writer and I haven't won yet.
That's it i give up on these forums, i'm the last person who can even win anymore, even they think Timewarp deserves it more than me, i'm a pants writer aren't i.
4 months of some hard work has never worked for me, i've kept my cool but i've only really won twice through my own post i was proud to win through that but it seems SR don't appreciate what i can do now.
Twice is not good enough for me even though it is a free game, i am amazed at how many times Grix and the others have won and look at me 2 wins and a notable.
4 months of some hard work has never worked for me, i've kept my cool but i've only really won twice through my own post i was proud to win through that but it seems SR don't appreciate what i can do now.
Twice is not good enough for me even though it is a free game, i am amazed at how many times Grix and the others have won and look at me 2 wins and a notable.
I've written a review for Mat Hoffmans BMX, just about to post it...
WE WANT MORE PSYCHO POSTS!
Oh yes i loved that post dan.
He's going to write a topic complaining that he didn't win yesterday.
Dan 2K1 will be back in about 6 months...
Page: