The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Who will you vote for for the title shot, if you vote at all?
Big Show? Kane? HBK?
Big Show? Kane? HBK?
Page:
It looked like Kane was alright last night, although I thought he was down on power. Maybe he had some painkilling injections or something.
Kawada wrote:
> ah Mike Goldberg you utter legend, none of this would be happening if
> it wasn't for you.
*All hail Mike Goldberg for making the WWE a little bit interesting*
> ah Mike Goldberg you utter legend, none of this would be happening if
> it wasn't for you.
*All hail Mike Goldberg for making the WWE a little bit interesting*
Kawada wrote:
> Cong_Man wrote:
> Ahh, another WWE card in turmoil. Wouldn't get this with TNA, the
> superior organisation in Wrestling today.
>
>
> *tries not to point out Bound for Glory and Nash* :-D
Ah well, you expect it with Nash...
> Cong_Man wrote:
> Ahh, another WWE card in turmoil. Wouldn't get this with TNA, the
> superior organisation in Wrestling today.
>
>
> *tries not to point out Bound for Glory and Nash* :-D
Ah well, you expect it with Nash...
Cong_Man wrote:
> Ahh, another WWE card in turmoil. Wouldn't get this with TNA, the
> superior organisation in Wrestling today.
*tries not to point out Bound for Glory and Nash* :-D
> Ahh, another WWE card in turmoil. Wouldn't get this with TNA, the
> superior organisation in Wrestling today.
*tries not to point out Bound for Glory and Nash* :-D
Ahh, another WWE card in turmoil. Wouldn't get this with TNA, the superior organisation in Wrestling today.
Goldust and Vader? That's a bit random...
Goldust and Vader? That's a bit random...
ah Mike Goldberg you utter legend, none of this would be happening if it wasn't for you.
It was obvious Coachman would win and Austin would have to job so Vince should have seen it a mile off.
Smedlos wrote:
> Austin's thrown a hissy fit as he was due to lose to Coachman after
> inteference from Mark Henry so has walked out again.
And so he should if they're going to use him to try and get Mark Henry over AGAIN. Let it go Vince, he's never ever going to be over, just fire his useless ass
> Austin's thrown a hissy fit as he was due to lose to Coachman after
> inteference from Mark Henry so has walked out again.
And so he should if they're going to use him to try and get Mark Henry over AGAIN. Let it go Vince, he's never ever going to be over, just fire his useless ass
Fígó wrote:
> For fecks sake, I won't want to see Batista take on Coach, that means
> nothing. At least Austin had a supposed good reason to be in the
> match and the crowd would be more behind him because of it.
>
> Batista? Pfft, nice one Vince.
They're trying to write into the storyline now how this relates to JR's firing - good luck I say.........
> For fecks sake, I won't want to see Batista take on Coach, that means
> nothing. At least Austin had a supposed good reason to be in the
> match and the crowd would be more behind him because of it.
>
> Batista? Pfft, nice one Vince.
They're trying to write into the storyline now how this relates to JR's firing - good luck I say.........
For fecks sake, I won't want to see Batista take on Coach, that means nothing. At least Austin had a supposed good reason to be in the match and the crowd would be more behind him because of it.
Batista? Pfft, nice one Vince.
Batista? Pfft, nice one Vince.
Page: