The "PC Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'm thinking of subscribing for a month maybe.
Anything new since about March/April? I bet there are about 3 updates too.
Anything new since about March/April? I bet there are about 3 updates too.
Page:
Yeah that could work, you could put your favourite/most commonly used moves in those slots, leaving the least important ones for a menu system.
Yeah, that sounds ok actually.
Yeah, that sounds ok actually.
Well if you have say 3 menus (Spells, Attacks, Emoticons) mapped to different buttons/triggers then one of those is pressed down and then you press the D-pad in the appropriate direction to select the various actions.
Using the Fable system you can have about 9 of each (spells, attacks, and emoticons) readily accessible and the rest stored in more detailed menus that can be assigned to one of the quicker menus.
I think having 9 of each easily accessible would make it decently playable at least. :)
Using the Fable system you can have about 9 of each (spells, attacks, and emoticons) readily accessible and the rest stored in more detailed menus that can be assigned to one of the quicker menus.
I think having 9 of each easily accessible would make it decently playable at least. :)
Some character classes have tonnes of different moves/spells though. perhaps a Final Fantasy-style menu, where moves are grouped by class, could work.
Blizzard would have quite a challenge to get everything in - which makes me think some bits are going to get cut - like Doom 3 - for simplicity.
Blizzard would have quite a challenge to get everything in - which makes me think some bits are going to get cut - like Doom 3 - for simplicity.
That sort of intricate menu system's already been translated well onto the Xbox with Fable's approach.
Bullett wrote:
> If it does, I'll still play the PC version
I can't see a console interface being successful. My screen is absolutely choked with icons, and my gamepad has a huge amount of emotion actions mapped to it.
> If it does, I'll still play the PC version
I can't see a console interface being successful. My screen is absolutely choked with icons, and my gamepad has a huge amount of emotion actions mapped to it.
If it does, I'll still play the PC version
Hedfix wrote:
> It might make it to 360/PS3, you never know.
It'd be in their interests to port it. It'd rake in even more cash.
> It might make it to 360/PS3, you never know.
It'd be in their interests to port it. It'd rake in even more cash.
Still intend to get this at somepoint.
It might make it to 360/PS3, you never know.
It might make it to 360/PS3, you never know.
For every boring 'kill ##' quests there are some quite magnificent ones.
OddToe wrote:
> I bought the game to fight other people, I hate doing quests.
>
> Kill 17 Razormane dumbwits and I will give you a pretty penny.
>
> AHHHHHHH!
Ah but no doubt if the quests weren't there to break things up then you'd get tired of killing people pretty quickly.
> I bought the game to fight other people, I hate doing quests.
>
> Kill 17 Razormane dumbwits and I will give you a pretty penny.
>
> AHHHHHHH!
Ah but no doubt if the quests weren't there to break things up then you'd get tired of killing people pretty quickly.
Page: