The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It's out tomorrow night, and I can't be the only Harry Potter fan on here. I shall be entering into the spirit of things and picking up my copy around midnight.
Unfortunately I know what happens.. thanks to the brilliance of the internet I had some spoilers thrust at me earlier. An important character turns bad and kills another important character, something I could have done without knowing, but still.
Anyone else looking forward to it?
Unfortunately I know what happens.. thanks to the brilliance of the internet I had some spoilers thrust at me earlier. An important character turns bad and kills another important character, something I could have done without knowing, but still.
Anyone else looking forward to it?
Page:
Actually typhoid or whatever your name is. I don't really care about you. If people look back over the history of my posts, they will see that whenever there is an arguement involving me, you will always try and jump in on the team that is against me. I don't really understand you. Nor do I want to waste my time with you and your lame insults. You see that is the beauty of the block button. Everyone can clearly see you're obsessed with me or you would've blocked me by now.
Anyway sorry for polluting the sacred potter thread with this crap.
Anyway sorry for polluting the sacred potter thread with this crap.
As an ultimate lord of Evil, Voldemort ranks alongside my mum when I won't wash the dishes.
He's utterly crap.
He's utterly crap.
Shame on you all for picking on the guy for mincing his words.
"I don't understand one thing" was obviously "there's one thing I don't understand about them" if you read the context.
Having said that, his attempt of "counter cussing" was a bit mongy so I guess he's gotten what he got, but still... :-P
Anysway, back to the books.
I think that the problem with the 5th book is that the end of the 4th one built it up to be getting dark and Voldemort creating some real havoc.
Then all he does is give Harry a couple of Nightmares which leads to an admittedly brilliant ambush at the end, but nothing happens apart from that.
Infact, some bint from the Ministry of Magic completely overshadows him.
Umbridge overshadowed the ultimate lord of evil.
"I don't understand one thing" was obviously "there's one thing I don't understand about them" if you read the context.
Having said that, his attempt of "counter cussing" was a bit mongy so I guess he's gotten what he got, but still... :-P
Anysway, back to the books.
I think that the problem with the 5th book is that the end of the 4th one built it up to be getting dark and Voldemort creating some real havoc.
Then all he does is give Harry a couple of Nightmares which leads to an admittedly brilliant ambush at the end, but nothing happens apart from that.
Infact, some bint from the Ministry of Magic completely overshadows him.
Umbridge overshadowed the ultimate lord of evil.
Alfonse wrote:
> How? Don't you think picking on a kid is a bit of a lame pastime?
AfroJoe isn't picking on you because you're a kid. He's picking on you because you're retarded.
> Wow wow wooza. i'm extremely sorry for putting a fullstop where a
> comma should be. Please shoot me for making a mistake.
You completely misinterpreted me. I was saying about how you one minute say "I don't understand one thing" and then the next minute say "No I do understand the books you loser".
> Like the books are *fantasy fiction*? AH forget it. You don't get
> what I'm trying to say.
Are you saying Harry Potter isn't a) fiction and b) fantasy?
> Actually yes I can always argue back. That's the good thing about
> having a mouth and brain.
I think you missed my irony. Calling people "fags" for reading HP isn't arguing, it's stupidity.
> We both know that wizards would not fit into our society just like
> immigrants and people who don't pay taxes when they come of age.
I don't know even where to start with this one.
> And can we stop with the hostility I get enough of that at home.
Ah, so now instead of playing the "oh I'm young don't pick on me" card, you're playing the "my dad rapes me" card. My heart bleeds.
> How? Don't you think picking on a kid is a bit of a lame pastime?
AfroJoe isn't picking on you because you're a kid. He's picking on you because you're retarded.
> Wow wow wooza. i'm extremely sorry for putting a fullstop where a
> comma should be. Please shoot me for making a mistake.
You completely misinterpreted me. I was saying about how you one minute say "I don't understand one thing" and then the next minute say "No I do understand the books you loser".
> Like the books are *fantasy fiction*? AH forget it. You don't get
> what I'm trying to say.
Are you saying Harry Potter isn't a) fiction and b) fantasy?
> Actually yes I can always argue back. That's the good thing about
> having a mouth and brain.
I think you missed my irony. Calling people "fags" for reading HP isn't arguing, it's stupidity.
> We both know that wizards would not fit into our society just like
> immigrants and people who don't pay taxes when they come of age.
I don't know even where to start with this one.
> And can we stop with the hostility I get enough of that at home.
Ah, so now instead of playing the "oh I'm young don't pick on me" card, you're playing the "my dad rapes me" card. My heart bleeds.
Tphi wrote:
> munn wrote:
> My mate showed us the adult version of one of the books (I can't
> remember which).
>
> Someone joked that it had a sexscene in it, I told him to check out
> page 69.
>
> He discovered quite a lot of innuendos on that page.
>
> Was this person Alfonse perchance?
That was a pretty cheap shot.
> munn wrote:
> My mate showed us the adult version of one of the books (I can't
> remember which).
>
> Someone joked that it had a sexscene in it, I told him to check out
> page 69.
>
> He discovered quite a lot of innuendos on that page.
>
> Was this person Alfonse perchance?
That was a pretty cheap shot.
Alfonse wrote:
> And go on then share my flaws with me. I always try
> to self improve.
Ok, well just from this page of the thread (this is gonna take a while anyway) I see the following flaws in your posts:
> Is it because you know you'll get finished by anyone older then
> fourteen?
Your arguing back at AfroJoe is laughable at best.
How? Don't you think picking on a kid is a bit of a lame pastime?
> No I do understand the books you loser,
Which contradicts your "I don't understand one thing" comment you made previously.
Wow wow wooza. i'm extremely sorry for putting a fullstop where a comma should be. Please shoot me for making a mistake.
> I just think the books are unrealistic
Like the books are *fantasy fiction*? AH forget it. You don't get what I'm trying to say.
> and by that I mean the people act in a way in which they wouldn't in real life.
You mean there aren't wizards in real life! OH NOES!!
I'm not talking about the wizardry.
> EDIT: Also you're all a bunch of fags for reading a kids book.
And when you can't argue back, you chuck your toys out the pram.
Actually yes I can always argue back. That's the good thing about having a mouth and brain.
> Yes but JK tries to make the book like real life with a hidden part
> to it.
> The books mentions normal things such as Playstation and books
> so it is probably supposed to be set in the same world we live in.
Well done, I think you've cracked the amazing fact there is a Magical World in the Harry Potter books.
You still don't get it.
> And if these books were anything like real life Harry Potter would be
> bullied badly because he has fame he doesn't really deserve. Wizards
> would have been found out and burnt at the stake.
Ok, we're now in the 21st century, Salem was quite a few years back.
We both know that wizards would not fit into our society just like immigrants and people who don't pay taxes when they come of age.
> And they probably wouldn't allow black students at Hogwarts.
Is probably your most idiotic comment to date. You later said you meant it was because they "wouldn't fit in".. right.
Read the book properly and you'll see what I mean.
> And as I said before you are such a gay for reading a childrens book.
And as if we needed another example of you being an idiot..
Meh.
> As most people my age probably do.
Finally, you then try and wiggle out of it claiming you're young and therefore aloud to be stupid. No, you're not. Go set fire to yourself or something.
Nope. I simply said I have a lot to learn about life.
And can we stop with the hostility I get enough of that at home.
> And go on then share my flaws with me. I always try
> to self improve.
Ok, well just from this page of the thread (this is gonna take a while anyway) I see the following flaws in your posts:
> Is it because you know you'll get finished by anyone older then
> fourteen?
Your arguing back at AfroJoe is laughable at best.
How? Don't you think picking on a kid is a bit of a lame pastime?
> No I do understand the books you loser,
Which contradicts your "I don't understand one thing" comment you made previously.
Wow wow wooza. i'm extremely sorry for putting a fullstop where a comma should be. Please shoot me for making a mistake.
> I just think the books are unrealistic
Like the books are *fantasy fiction*? AH forget it. You don't get what I'm trying to say.
> and by that I mean the people act in a way in which they wouldn't in real life.
You mean there aren't wizards in real life! OH NOES!!
I'm not talking about the wizardry.
> EDIT: Also you're all a bunch of fags for reading a kids book.
And when you can't argue back, you chuck your toys out the pram.
Actually yes I can always argue back. That's the good thing about having a mouth and brain.
> Yes but JK tries to make the book like real life with a hidden part
> to it.
> The books mentions normal things such as Playstation and books
> so it is probably supposed to be set in the same world we live in.
Well done, I think you've cracked the amazing fact there is a Magical World in the Harry Potter books.
You still don't get it.
> And if these books were anything like real life Harry Potter would be
> bullied badly because he has fame he doesn't really deserve. Wizards
> would have been found out and burnt at the stake.
Ok, we're now in the 21st century, Salem was quite a few years back.
We both know that wizards would not fit into our society just like immigrants and people who don't pay taxes when they come of age.
> And they probably wouldn't allow black students at Hogwarts.
Is probably your most idiotic comment to date. You later said you meant it was because they "wouldn't fit in".. right.
Read the book properly and you'll see what I mean.
> And as I said before you are such a gay for reading a childrens book.
And as if we needed another example of you being an idiot..
Meh.
> As most people my age probably do.
Finally, you then try and wiggle out of it claiming you're young and therefore aloud to be stupid. No, you're not. Go set fire to yourself or something.
Nope. I simply said I have a lot to learn about life.
And can we stop with the hostility I get enough of that at home.
munn wrote:
> My mate showed us the adult version of one of the books (I can't
> remember which).
>
> Someone joked that it had a sexscene in it, I told him to check out
> page 69.
>
> He discovered quite a lot of innuendos on that page.
Was this person Alfonse perchance?
> My mate showed us the adult version of one of the books (I can't
> remember which).
>
> Someone joked that it had a sexscene in it, I told him to check out
> page 69.
>
> He discovered quite a lot of innuendos on that page.
Was this person Alfonse perchance?
Cycloon wrote:
> The adult editions are odd.
>
> It's like they've semi-admitted that yeah, they like a kids book, but
> at the same time they're saying they need it to look older, and all
> the time everyone trumpets how wide an age range read it and how
> great that is.
My mate showed us the adult version of one of the books (I can't remember which).
Someone joked that it had a sexscene in it, I told him to check out page 69.
He discovered quite a lot of innuendos on that page.
> The adult editions are odd.
>
> It's like they've semi-admitted that yeah, they like a kids book, but
> at the same time they're saying they need it to look older, and all
> the time everyone trumpets how wide an age range read it and how
> great that is.
My mate showed us the adult version of one of the books (I can't remember which).
Someone joked that it had a sexscene in it, I told him to check out page 69.
He discovered quite a lot of innuendos on that page.
Alfonse wrote:
> And go on then share my flaws with me. I always try
> to self improve.
Ok, well just from this page of the thread (this is gonna take a while anyway) I see the following flaws in your posts:
> Is it because you know you'll get finished by anyone older then
> fourteen?
Your arguing back at AfroJoe is laughable at best.
> No I do understand the books you loser,
Which contradicts your "I don't understand one thing" comment you made previously.
> I just think the books are unrealistic
Like the books are *fantasy fiction*?
> and by that I mean the people act in a way in which they wouldn't in real life.
You mean there aren't wizards in real life! OH NOES!!
> EDIT: Also you're all a bunch of fags for reading a kids book.
And when you can't argue back, you chuck your toys out the pram.
> Yes but JK tries to make the book like real life with a hidden part
> to it.
> The books mentions normal things such as Playstation and books
> so it is probably supposed to be set in the same world we live in.
Well done, I think you've cracked the amazing fact there is a Magical World in the Harry Potter books.
> And if these books were anything like real life Harry Potter would be
> bullied badly because he has fame he doesn't really deserve. Wizards
> would have been found out and burnt at the stake.
Ok, we're now in the 21st century, Salem was quite a few years back.
> And they probably wouldn't allow black students at Hogwarts.
Is probably your most idiotic comment to date. You later said you meant it was because they "wouldn't fit in".. right.
> And as I said before you are such a gay for reading a childrens book.
And as if we needed another example of you being an idiot..
> As most people my age probably do.
Finally, you then try and wiggle out of it claiming you're young and therefore aloud to be stupid. No, you're not. Go set fire to yourself or something.
> And go on then share my flaws with me. I always try
> to self improve.
Ok, well just from this page of the thread (this is gonna take a while anyway) I see the following flaws in your posts:
> Is it because you know you'll get finished by anyone older then
> fourteen?
Your arguing back at AfroJoe is laughable at best.
> No I do understand the books you loser,
Which contradicts your "I don't understand one thing" comment you made previously.
> I just think the books are unrealistic
Like the books are *fantasy fiction*?
> and by that I mean the people act in a way in which they wouldn't in real life.
You mean there aren't wizards in real life! OH NOES!!
> EDIT: Also you're all a bunch of fags for reading a kids book.
And when you can't argue back, you chuck your toys out the pram.
> Yes but JK tries to make the book like real life with a hidden part
> to it.
> The books mentions normal things such as Playstation and books
> so it is probably supposed to be set in the same world we live in.
Well done, I think you've cracked the amazing fact there is a Magical World in the Harry Potter books.
> And if these books were anything like real life Harry Potter would be
> bullied badly because he has fame he doesn't really deserve. Wizards
> would have been found out and burnt at the stake.
Ok, we're now in the 21st century, Salem was quite a few years back.
> And they probably wouldn't allow black students at Hogwarts.
Is probably your most idiotic comment to date. You later said you meant it was because they "wouldn't fit in".. right.
> And as I said before you are such a gay for reading a childrens book.
And as if we needed another example of you being an idiot..
> As most people my age probably do.
Finally, you then try and wiggle out of it claiming you're young and therefore aloud to be stupid. No, you're not. Go set fire to yourself or something.
-(::::)-
/ ?
/ ?
Page: