Viewing Thread:
"San Andreas IGN Review"

[URL]http://ps2.ign.com/articles/559/559560p1.html[/URL]

9.9/10

w00t :D

Maybe this also includes playing with 2 players ???

Every game has 150 hours in it......potentially - GTA might just have more variety than others.

By the way i was reading in PSM that the game has over 150 hours of gameplay. Now that's got to be wrong hasn't it? Especially seeing as how people on Gamefaqs are already saying they've finished it

Azul XXX wrote:
> Scenario:
>
> Juan Pablo Hayanakuri Mashakano (Nintendo Exec, as we all know) -
> "I wish we made games that didn't look like they were ripped
> straight from a kiddies colouring in book!"
>
> *Suicide*

Scenario:

Azul is a mongo.

End of Scenario.

They've vastly over-rated it. Yeah, the game is easily worth at least 9 out of 10, but to give it 9.9 is absurd.

There are far too many flaws.

-12 respect points for IGN

Oh forgot to do my usual response when anything regarding IGN arises.

*Can't spell ignorance without an I-G-N

Mav wrote:
> Why is it so fashionable to criticise Driv3r?
>
> Despite all its shortcomings, I actually had a lot of fun with it.


As long as you enjoyed it that's all that matters. Personally i found the driving segments great however as soon as you got out the car it was god awful.

At present it doesn't interest me as a must buy game for my collection. If it does come out on Xbox, I may consider it, but even then I'm not likely to get it.

I've got the GTA double pack and I rarely play that. Not bad games, but just not really my thing.

Vice City was the breas**ts but it had problems.

San Andreas = Vice City multiplied by 5 with a lot of s**tuff fixed and a sh*t load more s**tuff jus**t for laughs...I predict it's the breas**ts..maybe not 9.9 though.

I'm not denying that in this case they could be providing an honest review.

I'm just stating it is rather naive of people to believe that there isn't any influences involved with big game reviews.