The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> As you know i'm not one for graphics. I'll wait until i actually play
> the thing before passing a judgement.
You may aswell grab a cheap cube and take advantage of the exclusive RPG's along with RE4 then.
You're coming across like a bit of a stubborn PS2 fanboy here.
Hell, at the risk of repeating myself, I would own all 3 consoles if it weren't for the fact that PS2's aren't very sturdy.
> I've got about 30 games on the PS2 i've yet to start (including
> Gladius :-D), the Cube and RE4 holds zero appeal to me
Heh.
I've got about that on Xbox and 4 on the cube. Do you think that would stop me getting a PS2 if I thought it wouldn't break? Not a chance.
> You're coming across like a bit of a stubborn PS2 fanboy here.
ermmm how exactly? Because i've said i'll wait until i play the game before rating it? My god such fanboy behaviour. Exactly how is that more fanboy than saying GC RE4 is much better than the PS2 version which isn't even out yet?
Not saying it isn't, most probably will be. My point is i'll wait until it comes out and play it before passing judgement. If that makes me a PS2 fanboy than i better start putting up the playstation wallpaper
[URL]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=20391&item=8195919474&rd=1[/URL]
> I've got about that on Xbox and 4 on the cube. Do you think that
> would stop me getting a PS2 if I thought it wouldn't break? Not a
> chance.
Well my last PS2 lasted 4 odd years so i haven't had anywhere near as much trouble as others have had. Personally i don't see the point in buying a console and games i won't play for a good year or 2 considering i have a ton of games in my 'to play' list already. Most of which are RPG's which will take about 60 hours least each
If you'd rather play the inferior version rather than grab a cheap console that seems quite daft to me.
>
> Well my last PS2 lasted 4 odd years so i haven't had anywhere near as
> much trouble as others have had. Personally i don't see the point in
> buying a console and games i won't play for a good year or 2
> considering i have a ton of games in my 'to play' list already. Most
> of which are RPG's which will take about 60 hours least each
Well to turn your own advice back on you:
You won't know which ones you'll want to play unless you give them a go. You might have a quick go on the cube ones and decided to come back to some of the PS2 ones later because 1 or 2 of the cube ones seem to demand to be played 'right now'.
You won't know until you've played them a bit, however.
> It's called commonsense.
>
> If you'd rather play the inferior version rather than grab a cheap
> console that seems quite daft to me.
Dear god, have i said i would RATHER play the PS2 version? No i haven't. I have said i will play that game before rating it, which i think is common sense. I don't have a cube, and i've never been in the habit of buying a console for one game, and if i was it damn sure wouldn't be for a Resident Evil game. A Nippon Ichi one yes :-D
> Well to turn your own advice back on you:
>
> You won't know which ones you'll want to play
But i do know which ones i want to play. There's a good 10 RPG's alone i want to play on the PS2 first before thinking of anything else. Trouble is Warcraft is taking up all my spare time and whenever i do play my PS2 it's either to have a game of MVP Baseball or Disgaea