The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What happened to everyone? The Sony's Cronies lol? This place used to be full of activity, now theres barely an actyive topic in sight?!
Page:
Hedfix wrote:
> But RE4 is much more of an FPS/3rd person shooter than the previous
> games. It's a big change. :P
arghhhhhhhhhhh i don't give a flying monkey's douchebag about RE4. I have zero want or need to play it.
*dies*
> But RE4 is much more of an FPS/3rd person shooter than the previous
> games. It's a big change. :P
arghhhhhhhhhhh i don't give a flying monkey's douchebag about RE4. I have zero want or need to play it.
*dies*
Hedfix wrote:
> If it runs the game you want to play in the best possible way then
> it's hardy a waste. :S
But i don't want to play it, as i said before today i hadn't even thought of RE4 or have any inclination to want to play it. I was merely wondering how people can condemn a game they haven't played yet.
> If it runs the game you want to play in the best possible way then
> it's hardy a waste. :S
But i don't want to play it, as i said before today i hadn't even thought of RE4 or have any inclination to want to play it. I was merely wondering how people can condemn a game they haven't played yet.
Kawada wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> When you finally get round to playing RE4 on the PS2 you'll probably
> be quite eager to play the better version.
>
>
> Or like all other Resi games before it i'll consider it extremely
> tedious and go back to my sports, FPS and RPG games :-D
But RE4 is much more of an FPS/3rd person shooter than the previous games. It's a big change. :P
> Hedfix wrote:
> When you finally get round to playing RE4 on the PS2 you'll probably
> be quite eager to play the better version.
>
>
> Or like all other Resi games before it i'll consider it extremely
> tedious and go back to my sports, FPS and RPG games :-D
But RE4 is much more of an FPS/3rd person shooter than the previous games. It's a big change. :P
Kawada wrote:
> Why buy a console that i'll hardly play and waste money, even if it
> is cheap? That's hardly common sense now is it?
If it runs the game you want to play in the best possible way then it's hardy a waste. :S
I bought a PS1 for 15 quid to play FF7 + 8. Waste of money? I think not. It runs those games as they were intended to be run.
> Why buy a console that i'll hardly play and waste money, even if it
> is cheap? That's hardly common sense now is it?
If it runs the game you want to play in the best possible way then it's hardy a waste. :S
I bought a PS1 for 15 quid to play FF7 + 8. Waste of money? I think not. It runs those games as they were intended to be run.
So asher what was that about no discussion? :-D
Geez this is the last time i dare to venture opinions on this site again. With this and the Beckham argument it's aged me another 5 years :-D
Geez this is the last time i dare to venture opinions on this site again. With this and the Beckham argument it's aged me another 5 years :-D
It's all cowards talk Heddy.
*touches wood*
I've had mine for 5 years or more now. No probs at all.
*touches wood*
I've had mine for 5 years or more now. No probs at all.
Hedfix wrote:
> When you finally get round to playing RE4 on the PS2 you'll probably
> be quite eager to play the better version.
Or like all other Resi games before it i'll consider it extremely tedious and go back to my sports, FPS and RPG games :-D
> When you finally get round to playing RE4 on the PS2 you'll probably
> be quite eager to play the better version.
Or like all other Resi games before it i'll consider it extremely tedious and go back to my sports, FPS and RPG games :-D
Before today RE4 wasn't even on my to get list. I just found it strange how people had already condemned a game that wasn't even released in Japan yet. I was just wondering how that was possible. Then the whole Gamecube thing kicked off.
Why buy a console that i'll hardly play and waste money, even if it is cheap? That's hardly common sense now is it?
Why buy a console that i'll hardly play and waste money, even if it is cheap? That's hardly common sense now is it?
Kawada wrote:
> Fix are you on commission on 'Cubes are something? I won't be getting
> a 'cube in the forseeable future, i don't want a cube at this point
> in time. Warcraft and my PS2 catalogue more than keep me occupied at
> the moment and i don't see any reason to spend more money on a Cube
> when both those systems more than occupy my time. There's nothing on
> the cube catalogue that makes me want to rush out and buy one.
>
> My opinion
When you finally get round to playing RE4 on the PS2 you'll probably be quite eager to play the better version.
Mabye not, but then we're back at 'commonsense' again. :P
> Fix are you on commission on 'Cubes are something? I won't be getting
> a 'cube in the forseeable future, i don't want a cube at this point
> in time. Warcraft and my PS2 catalogue more than keep me occupied at
> the moment and i don't see any reason to spend more money on a Cube
> when both those systems more than occupy my time. There's nothing on
> the cube catalogue that makes me want to rush out and buy one.
>
> My opinion
When you finally get round to playing RE4 on the PS2 you'll probably be quite eager to play the better version.
Mabye not, but then we're back at 'commonsense' again. :P
Kawada wrote:
> Exactly how did
>
> "I'll wait until i actually play the thing before passing a
> judgement"
>
> translate to "I'd rather play the PS2 version over the Gamecube
> version?
Because in the discussion we were recommending you get a cheap Cube.
> And nowhere in this discussion have i said the PS2 version will be
> better than the Cube version.
But it came across that way. Why play an inferior version when the better one can be so easily purchased with console for next to nothing?
As stated my point was i will wait to
> play the ps2 version before passing judgement on that version. I
> didn't mention the Cube at all. You just jumped to that conclusion.
> Not my fault
and there we have it.
If you're going to play the PS2 version I'm guessing you aren't going to get the cube version and here we are back at the 'commonsense' part of the discussion.
Rather than get a cheap cube you'd rather play an inferior version of the game and miss out on some exclusive RPG's?
> Exactly how did
>
> "I'll wait until i actually play the thing before passing a
> judgement"
>
> translate to "I'd rather play the PS2 version over the Gamecube
> version?
Because in the discussion we were recommending you get a cheap Cube.
> And nowhere in this discussion have i said the PS2 version will be
> better than the Cube version.
But it came across that way. Why play an inferior version when the better one can be so easily purchased with console for next to nothing?
As stated my point was i will wait to
> play the ps2 version before passing judgement on that version. I
> didn't mention the Cube at all. You just jumped to that conclusion.
> Not my fault
and there we have it.
If you're going to play the PS2 version I'm guessing you aren't going to get the cube version and here we are back at the 'commonsense' part of the discussion.
Rather than get a cheap cube you'd rather play an inferior version of the game and miss out on some exclusive RPG's?
Page: