> was that not Nintendo's pathetic attempt at beating halo (original).
Oh no you wont be able to read it unless your erm "friend" mac reads it for you. Anyway Halo is an FPS. Metroid prime is more of an adventure fps game. Also even though the first of its type n the series metroid has been going on for years. Another thing: My bum Halo is original. Look an FPS set in the future, never seen one of those before. Im not saying it aint a good game (its quite fun actually) but it aint original. Now i would say Halo is an attempt to rule half life...but thats jsut my worthless opinion.
> I thought the PS2 was the only console so far to be able to push over
> 1.0Gigaflop of data in one go. Its the only one to have a true 128bit
> core CPU (rather than 2x64 or 4x32bit), and I thought it was the one
> with the fastest bus linking the components together.
Does all that tech mumbo jumbo work on PS2 at max and surpass other consoles when an actual game is running?
Does that make PS2 games look or play better?
Oh yes, they can.
> It'll look, play, sound, everything better on GC because that's what
> it's been designed for.
And the Cube is technically far superior.
Oh look Top Score's been banned. Boo hoo.
(Afterall, it does have the DVD-ROM capacity for it!)
Have to wait and see.
It'll look, play, sound, everything better on GC because that's what it's been designed for.
And it'll come out about 9/10 months before.
Please tell me how it'll suck on GC, but not on PS2.
> I saw a PS2 mag the otherday, with Resi 4 on the front.
> 'TRY TO BELIEVE YOUR EYES!'
> I just laughed my head off.
We all know why resi 4 is coming to PS2 because capcom want to actually make some money on the game.
Nintendo exclusive pay-off was obviously not enough.