The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
has breast cancer. poor lady.
Page:
Darth Vampyr wrote:
> has breast cancer. poor lady.
Dang, they are small enough as it is.
> has breast cancer. poor lady.
Dang, they are small enough as it is.
HAHAHA, thats exactly what my friend said. She'll get a boob job no doubt.
SHEEPY wrote:
> I'm just sad because she'll be on loads of TV shows talking about how
> she is doing lots of work to raise awareness etc
She raised £2400 for a breast cancer charity by auctioning a bra of hers.
> I'm just sad because she'll be on loads of TV shows talking about how
> she is doing lots of work to raise awareness etc
She raised £2400 for a breast cancer charity by auctioning a bra of hers.
No one says you have to care, and your cries of 'why does it matter when a celebrity gets cancer!' have been heard a thousand times before. Fact is, someone got ill, and it's a shame. Because of her high profile it might raise some awareness of the disease and educate a few people along the way, maybe forcing people to get themselves checked, and that can only be a good thing.
Still, if it stops her from singing for a bit, I won't complain too loudly.
Still, if it stops her from singing for a bit, I won't complain too loudly.
She's cancelled her Glasto appearance.
I'm gutted.
I'm gutted.
You can blame the hippies and voodoo for that one.
Cong_Man wrote:
> I'd hardly call getting Breast Cancer 'grandios'. More like
> completley and utterly degrading.
Degrading? I never thought of it like that. I supposed it must depend on how you tackle any kind of cancer mentally.
So it's a celebrity, that's no big deal in itself but posting a negative reply in here is a little naff. What if it was just someone on here who had posted a thread about one of their family members. Just curious to know if you'd give the same kind of replies because you wouldn't know them either.
Someone suggested depositing her millions to find a cure but she may already give to this charity if she has a family history of breast cancer. She may well have been at hereditary (sp) risk but it is shocking in someone still so young for this kind of cancer.
> I'd hardly call getting Breast Cancer 'grandios'. More like
> completley and utterly degrading.
Degrading? I never thought of it like that. I supposed it must depend on how you tackle any kind of cancer mentally.
So it's a celebrity, that's no big deal in itself but posting a negative reply in here is a little naff. What if it was just someone on here who had posted a thread about one of their family members. Just curious to know if you'd give the same kind of replies because you wouldn't know them either.
Someone suggested depositing her millions to find a cure but she may already give to this charity if she has a family history of breast cancer. She may well have been at hereditary (sp) risk but it is shocking in someone still so young for this kind of cancer.
Ineedsleep wrote:
> So it's a celebrity, that's no big deal in itself but posting a
> negative reply in here is a little naff.
I didn't think my post was negative?
> So it's a celebrity, that's no big deal in itself but posting a
> negative reply in here is a little naff.
I didn't think my post was negative?
Sorry - only the first part of my post was in reply to the line from yours that I'd quoted. Your reply wasn't negative :)
The rest was just general disgust at the 'so what' replies that had been posted by other.
The rest was just general disgust at the 'so what' replies that had been posted by other.
Cong_Man wrote:
> I didn't think my post was negative?
Cong dont take everything to heart..
> I didn't think my post was negative?
Cong dont take everything to heart..
Page: