The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4387045.stm[/URL]
I would make that a non-automatic link, but why bother?
I would make that a non-automatic link, but why bother?
Page:
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4387045.stm[/URL]
I would make that a non-automatic link, but why bother?
I would make that a non-automatic link, but why bother?
Heh, I know I wouldn't.
Shocking but rather beleivable.
Didnt Nintendo do the rumblepack thing first though?
Didnt Nintendo do the rumblepack thing first though?
They weren't part of the controller.
It think it's the design of the technology in Sony's controllers that's the problem.
It think it's the design of the technology in Sony's controllers that's the problem.
Ah right I see.
Well they are thiefmerchants anyway.
Well they are thiefmerchants anyway.
Which is probably why they've not been sued. Microsoft already have been, settled in 2003 out of court and quietly, paid for the license.
Hedfix wrote:
> They weren't part of the controller.
>
> It think it's the design of the technology in Sony's controllers
> that's the problem.
The Gamecube control has built in rumble, so that doesn't make sense.
> They weren't part of the controller.
>
> It think it's the design of the technology in Sony's controllers
> that's the problem.
The Gamecube control has built in rumble, so that doesn't make sense.
Also read the cube rumble only uses one motor. Which is more like Nintendo's original rumble pack design.
Makes more sense, but I've got a funny feeling Nintendo registered their patent a year before Immersion did. The court case wouldn't be worth it.
Grix Thraves wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> They weren't part of the controller.
>
> It think it's the design of the technology in Sony's controllers
> that's the problem.
>
> The Gamecube control has built in rumble, so that doesn't make sense.
Paradox: wrote:
> Shocking but rather beleivable.
>
> Didnt Nintendo do the rumblepack thing first though?
I was talking about the N64.
> Hedfix wrote:
> They weren't part of the controller.
>
> It think it's the design of the technology in Sony's controllers
> that's the problem.
>
> The Gamecube control has built in rumble, so that doesn't make sense.
Paradox: wrote:
> Shocking but rather beleivable.
>
> Didnt Nintendo do the rumblepack thing first though?
I was talking about the N64.
Page: