The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4387045.stm[/URL]
I would make that a non-automatic link, but why bother?
I would make that a non-automatic link, but why bother?
Page:
Peter .K wrote:
> just being banned because dual shock was created?! stupid I say!!!
> Whats wrong with dual shock, it makes the game better!!
You're an idiot.
> just being banned because dual shock was created?! stupid I say!!!
> Whats wrong with dual shock, it makes the game better!!
You're an idiot.
just being banned because dual shock was created?! stupid I say!!!
Whats wrong with dual shock, it makes the game better!!
Whats wrong with dual shock, it makes the game better!!
I read the whole thing and didnt understand nothing..... :D
The Winster wrote:
> Its only that the guys at immersion are gonna earn much more than
> they deserve. If there would have been some genuine infringement,
> there are not many reasons (although there may be some about which I
> am unknown) that they were quite uptil now.
Yeah, mate, sorry I couldn't get that from:
The Winster wrote:
> The $90m award is more than three times Immersion's total revenues
> last year, which amounted to $23.8m.
>
> wtfs?
> Its only that the guys at immersion are gonna earn much more than
> they deserve. If there would have been some genuine infringement,
> there are not many reasons (although there may be some about which I
> am unknown) that they were quite uptil now.
Yeah, mate, sorry I couldn't get that from:
The Winster wrote:
> The $90m award is more than three times Immersion's total revenues
> last year, which amounted to $23.8m.
>
> wtfs?
The Winster wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> Sony has to give them $90m? Which is three times more than
> Immersion
> actually makes in a year?
>
> What's so hard to understand?
>
> ???
> ?
>
> Nothing too much hard to understand, an it seems that you are trying
> to be cool or something untouched by expressions.
>
> Its only that the guys at immersion are gonna earn much more than
> they deserve.
Sony stole their technology, and made millions (billions maybe?) out of it... Course they don't deserve it.
> If there would have been some genuine infringement,
> there are not many reasons (although there may be some about which I
> am unknown) that they were quite uptil now.
Actually they've been doing the lawsuits for it for a few years actually.
> Memorandum! wrote:
> Sony has to give them $90m? Which is three times more than
> Immersion
> actually makes in a year?
>
> What's so hard to understand?
>
> ???
> ?
>
> Nothing too much hard to understand, an it seems that you are trying
> to be cool or something untouched by expressions.
>
> Its only that the guys at immersion are gonna earn much more than
> they deserve.
Sony stole their technology, and made millions (billions maybe?) out of it... Course they don't deserve it.
> If there would have been some genuine infringement,
> there are not many reasons (although there may be some about which I
> am unknown) that they were quite uptil now.
Actually they've been doing the lawsuits for it for a few years actually.
Memorandum! wrote:
> Sony has to give them $90m? Which is three times more than Immersion
> actually makes in a year?
>
> What's so hard to understand?
>
> ???
> ?
Nothing too much hard to understand, an it seems that you are trying to be cool or something untouched by expressions.
Its only that the guys at immersion are gonna earn much more than they deserve. If there would have been some genuine infringement, there are not many reasons (although there may be some about which I am unknown) that they were quite uptil now.
> Sony has to give them $90m? Which is three times more than Immersion
> actually makes in a year?
>
> What's so hard to understand?
>
> ???
> ?
Nothing too much hard to understand, an it seems that you are trying to be cool or something untouched by expressions.
Its only that the guys at immersion are gonna earn much more than they deserve. If there would have been some genuine infringement, there are not many reasons (although there may be some about which I am unknown) that they were quite uptil now.
Memorandum! wrote:
> And BAM, as I log in...all his posts disappear.
Pffft, you don't need his posts in this thread either.
I've managed to make perfect sense of it without them.
Mind you, people have quoted his replies left right and centre, so I didnt miss much.
> And BAM, as I log in...all his posts disappear.
Pffft, you don't need his posts in this thread either.
I've managed to make perfect sense of it without them.
Mind you, people have quoted his replies left right and centre, so I didnt miss much.
Sony has to give them $90m? Which is three times more than Immersion actually makes in a year?
What's so hard to understand?
???
?
What's so hard to understand?
???
?
The $90m award is more than three times Immersion's total revenues last year, which amounted to $23.8m.
wtfs?
wtfs?
Hedfix wrote:
> I've been joking since, uh, around the time Grix called me a fool. :)
Then your jokes suck balls even more than I thought.
> I've been joking since, uh, around the time Grix called me a fool. :)
Then your jokes suck balls even more than I thought.
Page: