The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Disgusting, it really is.
Original Message posted by ßulle†† Yesterday at 12.14PM Original Message
There are 27 replies
Drunk Illegal Immigrant, driving with no license or insurance, knocks down and kills a child and only gets..
8 weeks
And he's still in the Country, despite being here illegally.
Hurrah for justice.
After reading this post it made me want to know what you all think about illegal immigrants. I think it is wrong and because Britain used to be a strong dominating country should stand strong now and make sure no forign immigrants get into the UK. Look what what happens when they get in...
Original Message posted by ßulle†† Yesterday at 12.14PM Original Message
There are 27 replies
Drunk Illegal Immigrant, driving with no license or insurance, knocks down and kills a child and only gets..
8 weeks
And he's still in the Country, despite being here illegally.
Hurrah for justice.
After reading this post it made me want to know what you all think about illegal immigrants. I think it is wrong and because Britain used to be a strong dominating country should stand strong now and make sure no forign immigrants get into the UK. Look what what happens when they get in...
Page:
kevstar wrote:
> reported me, for what exactly? You are not only a idiot, but a blatent
> liar too. Exactly how is Kevin from Gateshead going to be on my file
> you idiot, you think i'm the only Kev in Gateshead?. As I said, i'm
> on the sick for a reason you moron, i've already had medical reports
> along with scans to show my condition, you do realize you wasting
> time don't you. This just shows how much of a idiot you really are.
>
> Hahahahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahah you really are thick.
Kevin Little, 25, from Gateshead, on sickness benefit for seizures? How is that going to show up? Hmm...yeah, I wonder...
I think your boasting of spending all day sat in front of a computer screen might just be enough to order you to get a second opinion about your "condition". Don't you?
Heh. Enjoy your cold sweats my lad. I'm afraid that I'm telling the truth; the letter went out in yesterdays post. Sorry dear boy.
> reported me, for what exactly? You are not only a idiot, but a blatent
> liar too. Exactly how is Kevin from Gateshead going to be on my file
> you idiot, you think i'm the only Kev in Gateshead?. As I said, i'm
> on the sick for a reason you moron, i've already had medical reports
> along with scans to show my condition, you do realize you wasting
> time don't you. This just shows how much of a idiot you really are.
>
> Hahahahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahah you really are thick.
Kevin Little, 25, from Gateshead, on sickness benefit for seizures? How is that going to show up? Hmm...yeah, I wonder...
I think your boasting of spending all day sat in front of a computer screen might just be enough to order you to get a second opinion about your "condition". Don't you?
Heh. Enjoy your cold sweats my lad. I'm afraid that I'm telling the truth; the letter went out in yesterdays post. Sorry dear boy.
Mm, you have a point. I do have rather a problem with responding to gooberqueries. No matter how retarded they are.
Maybe I should just accept that he's been so thoroughly discredited as a racist, homophobic liar that the next time anyone here takes him seriously will be sometime in the late 24th century.
Yeah, I'll do that. After all, when all is said and done, he has to carry on being him...
(who wants to take bets as to how long it'll take him to start saying he's "won"? And who'd like the honour of pointing out that, to win a debate, one has to get the majority on ones side?)
Maybe I should just accept that he's been so thoroughly discredited as a racist, homophobic liar that the next time anyone here takes him seriously will be sometime in the late 24th century.
Yeah, I'll do that. After all, when all is said and done, he has to carry on being him...
(who wants to take bets as to how long it'll take him to start saying he's "won"? And who'd like the honour of pointing out that, to win a debate, one has to get the majority on ones side?)
reported me, for what exactly? You are not only a idiot, but a blatent liar too. Exactly how is Kevin from Gateshead going to be on my file you idiot, you think i'm the only Kev in Gateshead?. As I said, i'm on the sick for a reason you moron, i've already had medical reports along with scans to show my condition, you do realize you wasting time don't you. This just shows how much of a idiot you really are.
Hahahahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahah you really are thick.
Hahahahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahah you really are thick.
kevstar wrote:
> Hahahahahah, you havn't a clue do you, you try and come on here
> thinking you know it all, but you don't have a clue do you.
Oh, I said I knew it all, yes. That'll be another thnig that didn't really happen, but you think did.
Right
> lets get this straight, the foriegn language courses where they
> uncovered more illegal courses than what was legal. Are you
> suggesting I need to know the system to say that isn't an example of
> the system bieng abused? This is why I don't need to know the system,
> but rather the failings in the system. And you do know he done the
> same thing down South, only a year earlier, don't you.
But what has this directly got to do with the system itself? This takes place after the system has been left by the immigrants.
>
> aims etc. But you haven't, so your points exist in some bigoted,
> ugly void. The point isn't whether I know the immigration system,
> I'm just trying to point out what a racist bloke you are and how you
> seem to get so much wrong on this subject.
>
> So please with the answer I gave above there, could you explain how I
> seem to get so much wrong, such as.
Such as what, in particular? You mean such as the various links you've posted thinking they're anti-immigration but actually back up points made by those against you? Or how you still don't understand how to debate properly? Or even how you can't use English properly?
> And yes, I could indeed tell you my interpretation of the
> immigration
> system, and I'd be happy to once you've done so, as you were asked
> first.
>
> Really cos I don't think you can, I for one don't know the full
> system, I admit it, like I have done many times. Would you now like
> to explain please as you obviously claim you know.
So wait a second there Kevstar, you don't know how the system works?
You don't know how the system works, and you admit it?
Interesting. Interesting because you've tried to point out how a system isn't working, without really knowing what it's set out to do in the first place. So you've judged a system by your own standards, not by the standards of the system's objectives? Right. You do understand that this does indeed weaken your argument quite substantially, don't you? Because, though you'd like to claim otherwise, you DO need to know how a system works in order to show its failings. All you're doing is wailing about how you don't like certain aspects of the system, not how it's actually failing . There's an important difference between the two, Kevin.
And I'll get to work on my interpretation of the immigration system right now.
> Hahahahahah, you havn't a clue do you, you try and come on here
> thinking you know it all, but you don't have a clue do you.
Oh, I said I knew it all, yes. That'll be another thnig that didn't really happen, but you think did.
Right
> lets get this straight, the foriegn language courses where they
> uncovered more illegal courses than what was legal. Are you
> suggesting I need to know the system to say that isn't an example of
> the system bieng abused? This is why I don't need to know the system,
> but rather the failings in the system. And you do know he done the
> same thing down South, only a year earlier, don't you.
But what has this directly got to do with the system itself? This takes place after the system has been left by the immigrants.
>
> aims etc. But you haven't, so your points exist in some bigoted,
> ugly void. The point isn't whether I know the immigration system,
> I'm just trying to point out what a racist bloke you are and how you
> seem to get so much wrong on this subject.
>
> So please with the answer I gave above there, could you explain how I
> seem to get so much wrong, such as.
Such as what, in particular? You mean such as the various links you've posted thinking they're anti-immigration but actually back up points made by those against you? Or how you still don't understand how to debate properly? Or even how you can't use English properly?
> And yes, I could indeed tell you my interpretation of the
> immigration
> system, and I'd be happy to once you've done so, as you were asked
> first.
>
> Really cos I don't think you can, I for one don't know the full
> system, I admit it, like I have done many times. Would you now like
> to explain please as you obviously claim you know.
So wait a second there Kevstar, you don't know how the system works?
You don't know how the system works, and you admit it?
Interesting. Interesting because you've tried to point out how a system isn't working, without really knowing what it's set out to do in the first place. So you've judged a system by your own standards, not by the standards of the system's objectives? Right. You do understand that this does indeed weaken your argument quite substantially, don't you? Because, though you'd like to claim otherwise, you DO need to know how a system works in order to show its failings. All you're doing is wailing about how you don't like certain aspects of the system, not how it's actually failing . There's an important difference between the two, Kevin.
And I'll get to work on my interpretation of the immigration system right now.
You'll never make him realise he's being spanked, even by smaller kids here.
It's like somebody punching a cow, sure it's funny but the cow isn't gonna realise and go "heyyyyyy"
I recommend leaving the wastrel to his own fecal-future and simply laughing at the goober until he takes his ball and goes home.
It's like somebody punching a cow, sure it's funny but the cow isn't gonna realise and go "heyyyyyy"
I recommend leaving the wastrel to his own fecal-future and simply laughing at the goober until he takes his ball and goes home.
kevstar wrote:
> Really cos I don't think you can, I for one don't know the full
> system, I admit it, like I have done many times.
Really? When? Because this looks to me like the very first time you've actually admitted that.
Please; do point out where else you admit this?
I'll leave just how much this admission discredits most of your arguments until later. After all; I don't want to bring on one of your seizures...
> Really cos I don't think you can, I for one don't know the full
> system, I admit it, like I have done many times.
Really? When? Because this looks to me like the very first time you've actually admitted that.
Please; do point out where else you admit this?
I'll leave just how much this admission discredits most of your arguments until later. After all; I don't want to bring on one of your seizures...
Goatboy wrote:
> So he hasn't resorted to stuffing cottage cheese up his ass and
> calling himself Waldorf yet then?
Nope, but it's only a matter of time...
> So he hasn't resorted to stuffing cottage cheese up his ass and
> calling himself Waldorf yet then?
Nope, but it's only a matter of time...
So he hasn't resorted to stuffing cottage cheese up his ass and calling himself Waldorf yet then?
Jim of Honor wrote:
> kevstar wrote:
> Jim of Honor wrote:
> Jim of Honor wrote:
> Sorry Kevin, but you need to either:
>
> a.) explain the immigration system in your own words, or
> b.) explain why not doing so doesn't completely undermine your
> argument.
>
> Read particularly, "OWN WORDS", not copied and pasted
> because someone else has done some of the work for you.
>
> Why exactly, do you know it? then you tell me. If you don't know it
> then according to your logic it makes your arguments for immigration
> as pointless as mine doesn't it?
>
> Look Kev, you keep missing the point. You said you came on here to
> show the system has failings. To do so you have to know what the
> system is, in order to show how it's failing to meet its targets,
Hahahahahah, you havn't a clue do you, you try and come on here thinking you know it all, but you don't have a clue do you. Right lets get this straight, the foriegn language courses where they uncovered more illegal courses than what was legal. Are you suggesting I need to know the system to say that isn't an example of the system bieng abused? This is why I don't need to know the system, but rather the failings in the system. And you do know he done the same thing down South, only a year earlier, don't you.
> aims etc. But you haven't, so your points exist in some bigoted,
> ugly void. The point isn't whether I know the immigration system,
> I'm just trying to point out what a racist bloke you are and how you
> seem to get so much wrong on this subject.
So please with the answer I gave above there, could you explain how I seem to get so much wrong, such as.
>
> And yes, I could indeed tell you my interpretation of the immigration
> system, and I'd be happy to once you've done so, as you were asked
> first.
Really cos I don't think you can, I for one don't know the full system, I admit it, like I have done many times. Would you now like to explain please as you obviously claim you know.
> kevstar wrote:
> Jim of Honor wrote:
> Jim of Honor wrote:
> Sorry Kevin, but you need to either:
>
> a.) explain the immigration system in your own words, or
> b.) explain why not doing so doesn't completely undermine your
> argument.
>
> Read particularly, "OWN WORDS", not copied and pasted
> because someone else has done some of the work for you.
>
> Why exactly, do you know it? then you tell me. If you don't know it
> then according to your logic it makes your arguments for immigration
> as pointless as mine doesn't it?
>
> Look Kev, you keep missing the point. You said you came on here to
> show the system has failings. To do so you have to know what the
> system is, in order to show how it's failing to meet its targets,
Hahahahahah, you havn't a clue do you, you try and come on here thinking you know it all, but you don't have a clue do you. Right lets get this straight, the foriegn language courses where they uncovered more illegal courses than what was legal. Are you suggesting I need to know the system to say that isn't an example of the system bieng abused? This is why I don't need to know the system, but rather the failings in the system. And you do know he done the same thing down South, only a year earlier, don't you.
> aims etc. But you haven't, so your points exist in some bigoted,
> ugly void. The point isn't whether I know the immigration system,
> I'm just trying to point out what a racist bloke you are and how you
> seem to get so much wrong on this subject.
So please with the answer I gave above there, could you explain how I seem to get so much wrong, such as.
>
> And yes, I could indeed tell you my interpretation of the immigration
> system, and I'd be happy to once you've done so, as you were asked
> first.
Really cos I don't think you can, I for one don't know the full system, I admit it, like I have done many times. Would you now like to explain please as you obviously claim you know.
Jim of Honor wrote:
> I think Light was saying that he didn't know and that he didn't have
> enough proof to back up what he could judge from the situation (could
> be wrong). You, on the other hand, are still happy using your
> immature assumptions to try and prove others wrong.
Spot on.
> I think Light was saying that he didn't know and that he didn't have
> enough proof to back up what he could judge from the situation (could
> be wrong). You, on the other hand, are still happy using your
> immature assumptions to try and prove others wrong.
Spot on.
Page: