The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Did you know that Cybersex was illegal?
"A Scottish man has been jailed for 2 years after having Cybersex with a 13 year old girl"
I thought it was "frowned upon" by a lot of people but i didnt know it was illegal..so all you cybersexers...be warned!
"A Scottish man has been jailed for 2 years after having Cybersex with a 13 year old girl"
I thought it was "frowned upon" by a lot of people but i didnt know it was illegal..so all you cybersexers...be warned!
Page:
Peter .K wrote:
> yeah hopefully soon you`ll start to understand my posts
If you punctuated them in a more 'helpful' way that might be possible
> yeah hopefully soon you`ll start to understand my posts
If you punctuated them in a more 'helpful' way that might be possible
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> peter, if you think it didnt then it probably didnt.
>
> It didn`t make sense...I read i and then thought to myself "I
> don`t drstand that I shouldn`t have said it" when I speak it`s
> nomally a lot of nonsense anyway
> Hope that made a bit of sense
>
> ah well
yeah hopefully soon you`ll start to understand my posts
> Peter .K wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> peter, if you think it didnt then it probably didnt.
>
> It didn`t make sense...I read i and then thought to myself "I
> don`t drstand that I shouldn`t have said it" when I speak it`s
> nomally a lot of nonsense anyway
> Hope that made a bit of sense
>
> ah well
yeah hopefully soon you`ll start to understand my posts
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> peter, if you think it didnt then it probably didnt.
It didn`t make sense...I read i and then thought to myself "I don`t drstand that I shouldn`t have said it" when I speak it`s nomally a lot of nonsense anyway
Hope that made a bit of sense
> peter, if you think it didnt then it probably didnt.
It didn`t make sense...I read i and then thought to myself "I don`t drstand that I shouldn`t have said it" when I speak it`s nomally a lot of nonsense anyway
Hope that made a bit of sense
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
>
> I was hoping someone would bring that up.
> It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with
> it
> because it's seen that males are predators and can look after
> themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
>
> i did not mean it in that way, i ment it like Peadoes praying on
> people older than 13.
Sorry misread but how many people would think of a 14/15 year old boy with an older woman a victim, only the parents most likely because it's seen that boys aren't so easily controlled.
> Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
>
> I was hoping someone would bring that up.
> It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with
> it
> because it's seen that males are predators and can look after
> themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
>
> i did not mean it in that way, i ment it like Peadoes praying on
> people older than 13.
Sorry misread but how many people would think of a 14/15 year old boy with an older woman a victim, only the parents most likely because it's seen that boys aren't so easily controlled.
Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
>
> I was hoping someone would bring that up.
> It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with it
> because it's seen that males are predators and can look after
> themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
A woman can easily get away with something like cos a man is always the one to know better sorry if that sounded a bit sexist it wasn`t meant to be
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
>
> I was hoping someone would bring that up.
> It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with it
> because it's seen that males are predators and can look after
> themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
A woman can easily get away with something like cos a man is always the one to know better sorry if that sounded a bit sexist it wasn`t meant to be
Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
>
> I was hoping someone would bring that up.
> It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with it
> because it's seen that males are predators and can look after
> themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
Excuse me? You may have been hoping someone brought that up but you are wrong. If you meant not level in the eyes of the media then yes, you'd be right. However...a woman raping/having cybersex with a younger boy is exactly the same as if a man did it - it's just that younger boys are less likely to 'fall foul of' older women.
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
>
> I was hoping someone would bring that up.
> It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with it
> because it's seen that males are predators and can look after
> themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
Excuse me? You may have been hoping someone brought that up but you are wrong. If you meant not level in the eyes of the media then yes, you'd be right. However...a woman raping/having cybersex with a younger boy is exactly the same as if a man did it - it's just that younger boys are less likely to 'fall foul of' older women.
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> Jon $m!th wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in
> cyberspace?
> And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments
> can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna
> track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on
> the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
>
> Smoking a joint in cyberspace isn't physically possible so it isn't
> illegal. Smoking one whilst on the net is illegal. If you are on a
> Webcam and you are smoking a joint it is illegal because it is real
> -
> but, again, it isn't technically in cyberspace.
>
> It`s obviously illegal siting there and smoking a real joint but
> sitting on the computer and saying that you`re go smoke 1 can`t be
> illegal
>
> But makes you look like a complete idiot.
My post made no sense at all did it?!
> Peter .K wrote:
> Jon $m!th wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in
> cyberspace?
> And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments
> can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna
> track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on
> the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
>
> Smoking a joint in cyberspace isn't physically possible so it isn't
> illegal. Smoking one whilst on the net is illegal. If you are on a
> Webcam and you are smoking a joint it is illegal because it is real
> -
> but, again, it isn't technically in cyberspace.
>
> It`s obviously illegal siting there and smoking a real joint but
> sitting on the computer and saying that you`re go smoke 1 can`t be
> illegal
>
> But makes you look like a complete idiot.
My post made no sense at all did it?!
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
I was hoping someone would bring that up.
It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with it because it's seen that males are predators and can look after themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
I was hoping someone would bring that up.
It's not a level playing field, an older women could get away with it because it's seen that males are predators and can look after themselves, change it around and it's certainly not the case.
Peter .K wrote :
> Yeah, that is why the scot dude got banged up but why it may b
> illegal full stop is that people probably can cyber rape and
> emotinaly scare people then. I know i have contradicted my self but
> that does not matter, i am looking atboth sides of an arguement
> You`ve a small point there,saying stuff like "i`m gonna stalk
> you and rape you" in a chatroom can be scary to young girls
Although a 13-year-old girl is under the legal age for sex, she isn't classified as a young girl anymore. Let's face it...although that bloke was a sicko - the girl had to have consented somewhere - or stayed on a chatroom. Cybersex doesn't happen out of nowhere.
Its Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
Young boys and older girls is exactly the same as older men to younger girls - but these cases aren't reported very often - only men seem to have high-profile cases for paedophilia
> Yeah, that is why the scot dude got banged up but why it may b
> illegal full stop is that people probably can cyber rape and
> emotinaly scare people then. I know i have contradicted my self but
> that does not matter, i am looking atboth sides of an arguement
> You`ve a small point there,saying stuff like "i`m gonna stalk
> you and rape you" in a chatroom can be scary to young girls
Although a 13-year-old girl is under the legal age for sex, she isn't classified as a young girl anymore. Let's face it...although that bloke was a sicko - the girl had to have consented somewhere - or stayed on a chatroom. Cybersex doesn't happen out of nowhere.
Its Not You Its Me wrote:
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
Young boys and older girls is exactly the same as older men to younger girls - but these cases aren't reported very often - only men seem to have high-profile cases for paedophilia
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> it is the physciolgical scars they are worried about
> they can be caused in one sentence.
>
> I'm sure they can but i'd be more worried about encouraging people
> to
> think of anyone under 16 in that way, it bang out of order and just
> about excusable if you're young but anyone older should know better.
> I don't know why anyone would want someone that young when you could
> have some gorgeous 20something.
>
> Yeah, that is why the scot dude got banged up but why it may b
> illegal full stop is that people probably can cyber rape and
> emotinaly scare people then. I know i have contradicted my self but
> that does not matter, i am looking atboth sides of an arguement
> You`ve a small point there,saying stuff like "i`m gonna stalk
> you and rape you" in a chatroom can be scary to young girls
>
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
Yeah boys also but mainly pedo men would do it to a girl but still it could happen to a young boy
> Peter .K wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> it is the physciolgical scars they are worried about
> they can be caused in one sentence.
>
> I'm sure they can but i'd be more worried about encouraging people
> to
> think of anyone under 16 in that way, it bang out of order and just
> about excusable if you're young but anyone older should know better.
> I don't know why anyone would want someone that young when you could
> have some gorgeous 20something.
>
> Yeah, that is why the scot dude got banged up but why it may b
> illegal full stop is that people probably can cyber rape and
> emotinaly scare people then. I know i have contradicted my self but
> that does not matter, i am looking atboth sides of an arguement
> You`ve a small point there,saying stuff like "i`m gonna stalk
> you and rape you" in a chatroom can be scary to young girls
>
> What about young boys or older girls or boys????
Yeah boys also but mainly pedo men would do it to a girl but still it could happen to a young boy
Page: