The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Page:
Hmmmmmm, maybe that's a good thing i suppose......
Nope. It shall remain a secret.
Go on then Grix, spill the beans!
Who do you feel should be a regular and who isn't. Also, who is classified as a regular that you think shouldnt be?
Who do you feel should be a regular and who isn't. Also, who is classified as a regular that you think shouldnt be?
Though ironically, a lot have written very litte in terms of word count, and still made 300 posts....
Which is why some newbies are regulars in my eyes, and some regulars are still newbies in my eyes as well.
It's all down to how well they write, not how much they write.
It's all down to how well they write, not how much they write.
I agree with YH. The term 'regular' in the context of this forum, does not strictly match the definition in mind. It just happens to be the best approximation available.
Words get their meaning from the context they're used in, not from the dictionary.
Words get their meaning from the context they're used in, not from the dictionary.
True, we all have our own opinion's, its just yours are wrong.
:-)
:-)
Grim Fish, i think you're wrong there.
The phrase 'regular' would make you think that all you have to do is post regularly. But it doesnt seem to work like that. Ask some others and see if they agree with me, they may not of course......
The phrase 'regular' would make you think that all you have to do is post regularly. But it doesnt seem to work like that. Ask some others and see if they agree with me, they may not of course......
Page: