The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A very disappointing showing from our Weslh boys, and to be honest England didn't get out of second gear. 'Twas quite a boring match, and it was simply a case of 'Hello, we are England, we are basically much better than you and we are going to take this easy.'
If it weren't for a few greedy individuals our boys would have been humiliated completely. Beckham's goal was sweet mind.
And you can tell England and Wales hate each other:
'And now can we have a minute's silence please'
'F**k off Wales'
'F**k you'
etc...
Anyone else watch the match?
If it weren't for a few greedy individuals our boys would have been humiliated completely. Beckham's goal was sweet mind.
And you can tell England and Wales hate each other:
'And now can we have a minute's silence please'
'F**k off Wales'
'F**k you'
etc...
Anyone else watch the match?
Page:
Apparently Carlos Alberto plays with 3 up front as well. Although i never seen em play.
That's true. But he was slighty adventurous the other day, a whole 3 players upfront!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lil Bro wrote:
> No. I can compare them.
>
> It's not exactly bloody Brazil is it? And we should expect to score
> goals.
Not with Sven 'we're 1-0 up now everyone get your camping equipment and set up positions in our penalty box' Erikkson in charge
> No. I can compare them.
>
> It's not exactly bloody Brazil is it? And we should expect to score
> goals.
Not with Sven 'we're 1-0 up now everyone get your camping equipment and set up positions in our penalty box' Erikkson in charge
Lil Bro wrote:
> It's not exactly bloody Brazil is it?
Heh, they are coached by the brazilian captain of the 1970 team mind...
> It's not exactly bloody Brazil is it?
Heh, they are coached by the brazilian captain of the 1970 team mind...
No. I can compare them.
It's not exactly bloody Brazil is it? And we should expect to score goals. To score goals you need to attack, and Joe Cole is the perfect player to attack.
Him and Lampard also get back to defend as well, so yes, he should play.
It's not exactly bloody Brazil is it? And we should expect to score goals. To score goals you need to attack, and Joe Cole is the perfect player to attack.
Him and Lampard also get back to defend as well, so yes, he should play.
Lil Bro wrote:
> Joe Cole deserves a chance for England, especially as Gerrard is out
> and we're resorting to Nicky Butt. Cole is a mile better than Butt.
Do you actually know anything about football? They're two completely different players who play completely different roles, how can you possibly compare them!!!???
We can't have 4 attacking midfielders, Butt gives us the right balance, sitting in front of the back 4 (though i wouldnt mind seeing King in that role).
If i was paid a pound everytime i correct/prove you wrong i'd be a flippin millionaire.
> Joe Cole deserves a chance for England, especially as Gerrard is out
> and we're resorting to Nicky Butt. Cole is a mile better than Butt.
Do you actually know anything about football? They're two completely different players who play completely different roles, how can you possibly compare them!!!???
We can't have 4 attacking midfielders, Butt gives us the right balance, sitting in front of the back 4 (though i wouldnt mind seeing King in that role).
If i was paid a pound everytime i correct/prove you wrong i'd be a flippin millionaire.
I'm a firm believe that you shouldn't replpace a player unless they make a mistake and justify their dropping. Thus, I believe King and Terry should still be England's two centre backs.
Neither made a single mistake in te absence of Rio and Sol, and thus shouldn't be dropped. They should be left until they do unjustify their place in the team.
Beckham now has made too many mistakes, and thus should go. Too too many poor games for England, and to be captain, lmao.
Yes, Defoe should be in over Owen. The only reason he had a mare on Saturday was because Owen and Rooney were being so bloody selfish. I don't think either of them even attempted to give him the ball once in the entire game.
Joe Cole deserves a chance for England, especially as Gerrard is out and we're resorting to Nicky Butt. Cole is a mile better than Butt.
Neither made a single mistake in te absence of Rio and Sol, and thus shouldn't be dropped. They should be left until they do unjustify their place in the team.
Beckham now has made too many mistakes, and thus should go. Too too many poor games for England, and to be captain, lmao.
Yes, Defoe should be in over Owen. The only reason he had a mare on Saturday was because Owen and Rooney were being so bloody selfish. I don't think either of them even attempted to give him the ball once in the entire game.
Joe Cole deserves a chance for England, especially as Gerrard is out and we're resorting to Nicky Butt. Cole is a mile better than Butt.
lalakersrule wrote:
> Even though the man himself over the weekend, admittedly in one of
> the rags, said in an interview he himself thinks Rio is better and he
> looks up to him and always watches the games he's in given the
> chance?
Given the chance I'd watch Rio play. Just not in place of JT.
> Even though the man himself over the weekend, admittedly in one of
> the rags, said in an interview he himself thinks Rio is better and he
> looks up to him and always watches the games he's in given the
> chance?
Given the chance I'd watch Rio play. Just not in place of JT.
Colourless wrote:
> With John Terry, you can call me biased all you like , but it's not
> going to change my honest opinion that he is better than Rio.....
Even though the man himself over the weekend, admittedly in one of the rags, said in an interview he himself thinks Rio is better and he looks up to him and always watches the games he's in given the chance?
> With John Terry, you can call me biased all you like , but it's not
> going to change my honest opinion that he is better than Rio.....
Even though the man himself over the weekend, admittedly in one of the rags, said in an interview he himself thinks Rio is better and he looks up to him and always watches the games he's in given the chance?
lalakersrule wrote:
> Plus i was merely making a joke about your Gary Breen slip up :-D
I got that bit... I don't even know why I would type Breen when I was thinking Speed though, tis odd. Retard fingers I say....
> Ermm if Rio wasn't there that's a one on one with the keeps, i do
> think that is a major chance snuffed out.
That's like saying, if a keeper wasn't there for a back pass, it would be a goal. C'mon now...it's hardly a chance is it....
> He and Campbell made an
> equal amount of errors, scoreline had 0 in the opposition bracket,
> job's a good un. At least we have a back line that can actually pass
> it around each other instead of lumping it forward.
Campbell had a solid game, but has been playing solidly for a long time now....Whereas Rio - how many goals has he conceded in his two weeks or so back in the Man Utd team?
> Heh Chelsea bias shining through i see
I honestly think Joe Cole deserves a chance. I don't see how anyone can not think that...
Without Bias:
- I think Lampard has done enough to deserve a starting place. Anyone disagree?
- I think Bridge and Cole is our best option down that left hand side.
With John Terry, you can call me biased all you like , but it's not going to change my honest opinion that he is better than Rio.....
> but you'd still put Defoe in
> after his dismal showing yesterday?
Rather Defoe than Owen....
> Probably won't even need to get into first gear to beat Azerbijan
That's the point, that's why we should try a new team....
> Plus i was merely making a joke about your Gary Breen slip up :-D
I got that bit... I don't even know why I would type Breen when I was thinking Speed though, tis odd. Retard fingers I say....
> Ermm if Rio wasn't there that's a one on one with the keeps, i do
> think that is a major chance snuffed out.
That's like saying, if a keeper wasn't there for a back pass, it would be a goal. C'mon now...it's hardly a chance is it....
> He and Campbell made an
> equal amount of errors, scoreline had 0 in the opposition bracket,
> job's a good un. At least we have a back line that can actually pass
> it around each other instead of lumping it forward.
Campbell had a solid game, but has been playing solidly for a long time now....Whereas Rio - how many goals has he conceded in his two weeks or so back in the Man Utd team?
> Heh Chelsea bias shining through i see
I honestly think Joe Cole deserves a chance. I don't see how anyone can not think that...
Without Bias:
- I think Lampard has done enough to deserve a starting place. Anyone disagree?
- I think Bridge and Cole is our best option down that left hand side.
With John Terry, you can call me biased all you like , but it's not going to change my honest opinion that he is better than Rio.....
> but you'd still put Defoe in
> after his dismal showing yesterday?
Rather Defoe than Owen....
> Probably won't even need to get into first gear to beat Azerbijan
That's the point, that's why we should try a new team....
Page: