The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I was watching this on the news (from about 10:30-14:00) and i have to say i found it rather exciting, obviously it was a terrible ordeal for everyone involved. Especially the poor kids that were practically naked, apparently when they asked for a drink they were told to strip, their clothes were doused with water and they were told to suck the moisture out. Pretty grim stuff.
Near the end of the special show an ITN cameraman actually got into the gym where everyone had been held, the roof had collapsed (chechen rebels had rigged it with 14 explosive charges) while people were still inside and apparently some 100 bodies lay inside.
The chechens then fled to some buildings nearby and were holding a sustained firefight with the russian military.
Near the end of the special show an ITN cameraman actually got into the gym where everyone had been held, the roof had collapsed (chechen rebels had rigged it with 14 explosive charges) while people were still inside and apparently some 100 bodies lay inside.
The chechens then fled to some buildings nearby and were holding a sustained firefight with the russian military.
Page:
Light wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> Just sticking my head in without fully reading everything but I
> believe US embassy grounds count as US Soil so that might providea
> few examples for you.
>
> That's what I was wondering, cos if so then that statistic is
> ignoring the multitude of attacks on the US embassies worldwide
> (well...okay, in Iraq) during Dubya's regime.
>
> However, personally I think the "5 attacks" thing is utter
> cobblers. I don't actually believe it. Hearing that it's from the
> mouth of a US citizen doesn't make it true; just think of the asshat
> Bell talks as a UK citizen. Doesn't make his constant lies any more
> true.
I can't, it wasn't my thought, i was just using it to try to get you to see why the Americans feel their doing the right thing.
I never said that it was true either, and i never said that it justifies the escolating, open, mass military conflict around the world. I was just saying that, to an American, it seems to be working. I'd hoped that my goal was obvious in the initial post, it seems it wasn't. All i wanted to do was to highlight why, to some, the war on terror seems to be the right way to go.
And sorry for the double post.
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> Just sticking my head in without fully reading everything but I
> believe US embassy grounds count as US Soil so that might providea
> few examples for you.
>
> That's what I was wondering, cos if so then that statistic is
> ignoring the multitude of attacks on the US embassies worldwide
> (well...okay, in Iraq) during Dubya's regime.
>
> However, personally I think the "5 attacks" thing is utter
> cobblers. I don't actually believe it. Hearing that it's from the
> mouth of a US citizen doesn't make it true; just think of the asshat
> Bell talks as a UK citizen. Doesn't make his constant lies any more
> true.
I can't, it wasn't my thought, i was just using it to try to get you to see why the Americans feel their doing the right thing.
I never said that it was true either, and i never said that it justifies the escolating, open, mass military conflict around the world. I was just saying that, to an American, it seems to be working. I'd hoped that my goal was obvious in the initial post, it seems it wasn't. All i wanted to do was to highlight why, to some, the war on terror seems to be the right way to go.
And sorry for the double post.
Light wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> Just sticking my head in without fully reading everything but I
> believe US embassy grounds count as US Soil so that might providea
> few examples for you.
>
> That's what I was wondering, cos if so then that statistic is
> ignoring the multitude of attacks on the US embassies worldwide
> (well...okay, in Iraq) during Dubya's regime.
>
> However, personally I think the "5 attacks" thing is utter
> cobblers. I don't actually believe it. Hearing that it's from the
> mouth of a US citizen doesn't make it true; just think of the asshat
> Bell talks as a UK citizen. Doesn't make his constant lies any more
> true.
I can't, it wasn't my thought, i was just using it to try to get you to see why the Americans feel their doing the right thing.
I never said that it was true either, and i never said that it justifies the escolating, open, mass military conflict around the world. I was just saying that, to an American, it seems to be working. I'd hoped that my goal was obvious in the initial post, it seems it wasn't. All i wanted to do was to highlight why, to some, te war on terror seems to be the right way to go.
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> Just sticking my head in without fully reading everything but I
> believe US embassy grounds count as US Soil so that might providea
> few examples for you.
>
> That's what I was wondering, cos if so then that statistic is
> ignoring the multitude of attacks on the US embassies worldwide
> (well...okay, in Iraq) during Dubya's regime.
>
> However, personally I think the "5 attacks" thing is utter
> cobblers. I don't actually believe it. Hearing that it's from the
> mouth of a US citizen doesn't make it true; just think of the asshat
> Bell talks as a UK citizen. Doesn't make his constant lies any more
> true.
I can't, it wasn't my thought, i was just using it to try to get you to see why the Americans feel their doing the right thing.
I never said that it was true either, and i never said that it justifies the escolating, open, mass military conflict around the world. I was just saying that, to an American, it seems to be working. I'd hoped that my goal was obvious in the initial post, it seems it wasn't. All i wanted to do was to highlight why, to some, te war on terror seems to be the right way to go.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> it needed more slow motion shots, perhaps some guy ritchie styling,
> and a lot more swearing.
Yeah, the whole thing was crying out for bullet time.
> it needed more slow motion shots, perhaps some guy ritchie styling,
> and a lot more swearing.
Yeah, the whole thing was crying out for bullet time.
it needed more slow motion shots, perhaps some guy ritchie styling, and a lot more swearing.
Hedfix wrote:
> I started watching the ITV coverage but it was so poorly done (as
> usual) and geared into stirring up people emotions rather than
> reporting the news (as usual).
I thought the ITN coverage was superior, at least they had a guy actually in the school reporting what exactly was going on.
> I started watching the ITV coverage but it was so poorly done (as
> usual) and geared into stirring up people emotions rather than
> reporting the news (as usual).
I thought the ITN coverage was superior, at least they had a guy actually in the school reporting what exactly was going on.
there'll be no mining whatsoever.
'under-mine' as in literally?
Class. :D
Class. :D
I have titanium earthworms under that fence. there's no chance anyone will undermine me.
*Tunnels under Borat's fence and stabs him in the back*
I'll get my Camel.
Page: