The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Come on, your views.
My personal view is that England will win.
I also think we stand a real chance of the title.
Feel free to pop this if we plummet out, but know that if you "diss" me and my "mamma" that I will pop it when we win.
My personal view is that England will win.
I also think we stand a real chance of the title.
Feel free to pop this if we plummet out, but know that if you "diss" me and my "mamma" that I will pop it when we win.
Page:
England vs France - Probably a draw
I'm quite confident England will beat France.
I think i'm a little more optimistic after yesterdays performance, this england team has always been lacking goals, if they can attack like that against france i think we have a chance, if we had rio i would actually back us to win.
Colourless wrote:
> Clazon wrote:
> france do though, which makes them tournament winning.
>
> Hmph. They had a great World Cup I must say....
so 98 and 2000 were just one offs then?
idiot.
> Clazon wrote:
> france do though, which makes them tournament winning.
>
> Hmph. They had a great World Cup I must say....
so 98 and 2000 were just one offs then?
idiot.
down wrote:
> Well I wouldn't be worried about Trezeguet, his partnership with Henry
> has been awful
Nah. He(trezeguet) scored in each of thier last 5 qualifiers. Although mentally he probably wont be at his strongest with his future uncertain.
> Well I wouldn't be worried about Trezeguet, his partnership with Henry
> has been awful
Nah. He(trezeguet) scored in each of thier last 5 qualifiers. Although mentally he probably wont be at his strongest with his future uncertain.
I believe the game shall be a complete bore ending in a 0-0 draw.
Anyways, did you know France havnt let in a goal since June last year?
They've played about 10 games since then.
Anyways, did you know France havnt let in a goal since June last year?
They've played about 10 games since then.
You'll get p*ssed on.
End of discussion.
:^P
It's true though - if you struggle a 1-1 result with Japan, a decent enough team, how are you going to do against the world number 2's? (Dodgy phrasing, sod off).
All you have to do is look at a handful of the French players.
Yep.
You're screwed.
End of discussion.
:^P
It's true though - if you struggle a 1-1 result with Japan, a decent enough team, how are you going to do against the world number 2's? (Dodgy phrasing, sod off).
All you have to do is look at a handful of the French players.
Yep.
You're screwed.
Well I wouldn't be worried about Trezeguet, his partnership with Henry has been awful, they won the confederations cup with Henry and Govou or Henry and Cisse, but with Trezeguet the partnership doesn't work. Perhaps Henry's got enough individual skill to worry England but I'd be more worried about the midfield - Rothen, Zidane, Pires, Vieira, Makalele, Giuly? Get past that and I'd be impressed.
Clazon wrote:
> france do though, which makes them tournament winning.
Hmph. They had a great World Cup I must say....
> france do though, which makes them tournament winning.
Hmph. They had a great World Cup I must say....
> But when you're 6-1 up, you aren't particularly bothered about
> scoring more, are you?
brazil and france do though, which makes them top-class, tournament winning, finishers.
> scoring more, are you?
brazil and france do though, which makes them top-class, tournament winning, finishers.
Page: