The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Anyone else watching it? We're looking fairly good, Rooney's strike was pretty decent even despite the deflection. What Jamie Carragher was doing for their goal though I don't know.
Anyway, we look fairly strong, and a good confidence booster for Rooney no doubt.
Anyway, we look fairly strong, and a good confidence booster for Rooney no doubt.
Page:
AfroJoe wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> If we play like this in EURO 2004, we should get that win against
> France, I don't see why we can't.
>
> There's a massive difference in quality between Iceland and France.
> Iceland are a lowly European nation with a small population
284,000
> and not a lot of footballing talent.
Other than Eidur of course.....
> Oh, and your team is inconsistent as well. Look at Paul Scholes...
Lies. He's very consistent. He's consistently not scoring.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> If we play like this in EURO 2004, we should get that win against
> France, I don't see why we can't.
>
> There's a massive difference in quality between Iceland and France.
> Iceland are a lowly European nation with a small population
284,000
> and not a lot of footballing talent.
Other than Eidur of course.....
> Oh, and your team is inconsistent as well. Look at Paul Scholes...
Lies. He's very consistent. He's consistently not scoring.
Bulgaria are one of the most underated sides in Europe, I highly doubt they'll get past the group stages.
Im cheering on Sweden in Euro 2004, as close o a home nation as I can get in the comp being half Swedish. I dont think they'll win, but I think they'll get to the quarters or maybe even semis.
Azul wrote:
> "England are just proving the critics wrong"
> *Claps*
> By beating Iceland? OOH, my mouth is firmly shut now!
Yes, by five goals. 6-1. Winning the second half, with the players we had out.
> "England are just proving the critics wrong"
> *Claps*
> By beating Iceland? OOH, my mouth is firmly shut now!
Yes, by five goals. 6-1. Winning the second half, with the players we had out.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Oh, and your team is inconsistent as
> well. Look at Paul Scholes...
What team are you supporting?
> Oh, and your team is inconsistent as
> well. Look at Paul Scholes...
What team are you supporting?
Neó wrote:
> So they had a poor World Cup, doesn't mean that they will be poor
> this time round does it? another year, another tournament.
Doesn't mean they'll play any better. Personally, I think England should go into the game with nothing to fear, especially with no injury worries and an on-fire squad, full of confidence, as they showed today.
> So they had a poor World Cup, doesn't mean that they will be poor
> this time round does it? another year, another tournament.
Doesn't mean they'll play any better. Personally, I think England should go into the game with nothing to fear, especially with no injury worries and an on-fire squad, full of confidence, as they showed today.
Forest Fan wrote:
> If we play like this in EURO 2004, we should get that win against
> France, I don't see why we can't.
There's a massive difference in quality between Iceland and France. Iceland are a lowly European nation with a small population and not a lot of footballing talent. Plus, this was a friendly, and the opposition is going to be far more competitve at Euro 2004. France are going to be a lot different. Oh, and your team is inconsistent as well. Look at Paul Scholes...
> If we play like this in EURO 2004, we should get that win against
> France, I don't see why we can't.
There's a massive difference in quality between Iceland and France. Iceland are a lowly European nation with a small population and not a lot of footballing talent. Plus, this was a friendly, and the opposition is going to be far more competitve at Euro 2004. France are going to be a lot different. Oh, and your team is inconsistent as well. Look at Paul Scholes...
Lindgren wrote:
> Im convinced France will cream England, France are a much more
> talented side.
I think it's a possibility, but i'm prepared for you not to talk to me if england win.
This place in going to be unbearable for the english if we lose, and i'm expecting a lot of bitterness from the scottish and irish contingent if we actually beat them " Well you havent won the tournament yet "
> Im convinced France will cream England, France are a much more
> talented side.
I think it's a possibility, but i'm prepared for you not to talk to me if england win.
This place in going to be unbearable for the english if we lose, and i'm expecting a lot of bitterness from the scottish and irish contingent if we actually beat them " Well you havent won the tournament yet "
Im convinced France will cream England, France are a much more talented side.
Forest Fan wrote:
> If we play like this in EURO 2004, we should get that win against
> France, I don't see why we can't.
Because France aren't Iceland, you total spakker.
Your retarded comments make me weep with laughter sometimes, they really do.
"England are just proving the critics wrong"
*Claps*
By beating Iceland? OOH, my mouth is firmly shut now!
> If we play like this in EURO 2004, we should get that win against
> France, I don't see why we can't.
Because France aren't Iceland, you total spakker.
Your retarded comments make me weep with laughter sometimes, they really do.
"England are just proving the critics wrong"
*Claps*
By beating Iceland? OOH, my mouth is firmly shut now!
Page: