The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?
Page:
Then seeing as this is a random topic,
Who are the alpha male's of the forum, who are respected and taken seriously who are the leaders?
And don't say the notables because they arent even around that much.
Who are the alpha male's of the forum, who are respected and taken seriously who are the leaders?
And don't say the notables because they arent even around that much.
Yep!
RoJ wrote:
> CTUbauer wrote:
>
> Leaders of men then?
>
> Well, more like men with a small cranial capacity, the sort of people
> who would urinate out a window whilst forgetting to open it first.
> Perhaps my definition was not conveyed very accurately.
No, it certainly wasn't. So can I assume that townies/scallies can be classed as 'Alpha males'? :)
> CTUbauer wrote:
>
> Leaders of men then?
>
> Well, more like men with a small cranial capacity, the sort of people
> who would urinate out a window whilst forgetting to open it first.
> Perhaps my definition was not conveyed very accurately.
No, it certainly wasn't. So can I assume that townies/scallies can be classed as 'Alpha males'? :)
RoJ wrote:
> CTUbauer wrote:
>
> Leaders of men then?
>
> Well, more like men with a small cranial capacity, the sort of people
> who would urinate out a window whilst forgetting to open it first.
> Perhaps my definition was not conveyed very accurately.
That's uber-stupidity. I see :)
> CTUbauer wrote:
>
> Leaders of men then?
>
> Well, more like men with a small cranial capacity, the sort of people
> who would urinate out a window whilst forgetting to open it first.
> Perhaps my definition was not conveyed very accurately.
That's uber-stupidity. I see :)
P4NT$ wrote:
> RoJ wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
>
> Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are
> assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about
> assumption, if not, learn it.
>
> I assumed and pointed out what was obvious like this whole topic!
>
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
>
> Because some people, such as you, are retards as am I. Things need
> pointing
> out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
>
> You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You
> accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for
> pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a
> conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole
> argument in jeopardy.
>
> I have never said I am a retard be careful of assumptions.
>
>
>
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
>
> To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this
> argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on
> your rapid descent to failure.
> Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
> "choice you choose to answer and declare yourself
> retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This
> sentence does not make sense.
>
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
>
> Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I
> called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you
> chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did
> not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
>
> Surely if you did not have problems you would have let such a
> retarded post pass you by and not given it the time of day. But yet
> you answer and continue to do so, therefore the problem is with you.
>
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
>
> To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared,
> are
> we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net.
> You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered.
> Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
>
> If I choose to skip 'large chunks of your argument' it is because
> they are so weak, that any response would be unfair on you. There is
> no need for thanks. And the 'points' as you call them have already
> been handed to me.
JUST STOP. Now. For me ;)
> RoJ wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
>
> Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are
> assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about
> assumption, if not, learn it.
>
> I assumed and pointed out what was obvious like this whole topic!
>
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
>
> Because some people, such as you, are retards as am I. Things need
> pointing
> out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
>
> You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You
> accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for
> pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a
> conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole
> argument in jeopardy.
>
> I have never said I am a retard be careful of assumptions.
>
>
>
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
>
> To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this
> argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on
> your rapid descent to failure.
> Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
> "choice you choose to answer and declare yourself
> retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This
> sentence does not make sense.
>
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
>
> Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I
> called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you
> chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did
> not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
>
> Surely if you did not have problems you would have let such a
> retarded post pass you by and not given it the time of day. But yet
> you answer and continue to do so, therefore the problem is with you.
>
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
>
> To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared,
> are
> we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net.
> You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered.
> Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
>
> If I choose to skip 'large chunks of your argument' it is because
> they are so weak, that any response would be unfair on you. There is
> no need for thanks. And the 'points' as you call them have already
> been handed to me.
JUST STOP. Now. For me ;)
CTUbauer wrote:
> Leaders of men then?
Well, more like men with a small cranial capacity, the sort of people who would urinate out a window whilst forgetting to open it first.
Perhaps my definition was not conveyed very accurately.
> Leaders of men then?
Well, more like men with a small cranial capacity, the sort of people who would urinate out a window whilst forgetting to open it first.
Perhaps my definition was not conveyed very accurately.
RoJ wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
>
> Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are
> assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about
> assumption, if not, learn it.
I assumed and pointed out what was obvious like this whole topic!
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
>
> Because some people, such as you, are retards as am I. Things need pointing
> out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
>
> You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You
> accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for
> pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a
> conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole
> argument in jeopardy.
I have never said I am a retard be careful of assumptions.
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
>
> To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this
> argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on
> your rapid descent to failure.
> Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
> "choice you choose to answer and declare yourself
> retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This
> sentence does not make sense.
>
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
>
> Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I
> called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you
> chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did
> not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
Surely if you did not have problems you would have let such a retarded post pass you by and not given it the time of day. But yet you answer and continue to do so, therefore the problem is with you.
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
>
> To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared, are
> we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net.
> You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered.
> Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
If I choose to skip 'large chunks of your argument' it is because they are so weak, that any response would be unfair on you. There is no need for thanks. And the 'points' as you call them have already been handed to me.
> P4NT$ wrote:
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
>
> Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are
> assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about
> assumption, if not, learn it.
I assumed and pointed out what was obvious like this whole topic!
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
>
> Because some people, such as you, are retards as am I. Things need pointing
> out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
>
> You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You
> accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for
> pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a
> conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole
> argument in jeopardy.
I have never said I am a retard be careful of assumptions.
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
>
> To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this
> argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on
> your rapid descent to failure.
> Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
> "choice you choose to answer and declare yourself
> retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This
> sentence does not make sense.
>
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
>
> Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I
> called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you
> chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did
> not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
Surely if you did not have problems you would have let such a retarded post pass you by and not given it the time of day. But yet you answer and continue to do so, therefore the problem is with you.
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
>
> To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared, are
> we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net.
> You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered.
> Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
If I choose to skip 'large chunks of your argument' it is because they are so weak, that any response would be unfair on you. There is no need for thanks. And the 'points' as you call them have already been handed to me.
I see.
How intruiging.
How intruiging.
Pretty much so, by the look of things.
Page: