Viewing Thread:
"One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?"

One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?

Do you always got too far? You can't compare the USA with the staff; there's quite a difference in size and occupation.

RoJ wrote:
> Because my internet just timed out and I lsot the majority of my
> argument. I am not going to waste precious time retyping it.
> I am fed up of humiliating you.
> I will instead devote my time to other topics/posts.

Excuses a very poor one.

Der Nazi wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> The respected ones should be the staff and creators.
>
> I agree, but they don't make very many appearances here, so without
> much evidence of anything, they are not respected quite as much.

Yes but they hold the control, there should always be respect for them and the people they should respect is US, without us they have to power.

Because my internet just timed out and I lsot the majority of my argument. I am not going to waste precious time retyping it.
I am fed up of humiliating you.
I will instead devote my time to other topics/posts.

P4NT$ wrote:
> The respected ones should be the staff and creators.

I agree, but they don't make very many appearances here, so without much evidence of anything, they are not respected quite as much.

Flockhart wrote:
> Then seeing as this is a random topic,
> Who are the alpha male's of the forum, who are respected and taken
> seriously who are the leaders?
> And don't say the notables because they arent even around that much.


Flockhart wrote:
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Well, the Notables are generally taken seriously.
> I give up.


I can understand that.

Der Nazi wrote:
> Well, the Notables are generally taken seriously.
I give up.

Well, the Notables are generally taken seriously.

Flockhart wrote:
> Then seeing as this is a random topic,
> Who are the alpha male's of the forum, who are respected and taken
> seriously who are the leaders?
> And don't say the notables because they arent even around that much.

The respected ones should be the staff and creators.

CTUbauer wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> RoJ wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
>
> Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are
> assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about
> assumption, if not, learn it.
>
> I assumed and pointed out what was obvious like this whole topic!
>
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
>
> Because some people, such as you, are retards as am I. Things need
> pointing
> out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
>
> You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You
> accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for
> pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a
> conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole
> argument in jeopardy.
>
> I have never said I am a retard be careful of assumptions.
>
>
>
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
>
> To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this
> argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on
> your rapid descent to failure.
> Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
> "choice you choose to answer and declare yourself
> retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This
> sentence does not make sense.
>
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
>
> Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I
> called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you
> chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did
> not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
>
> Surely if you did not have problems you would have let such a
> retarded post pass you by and not given it the time of day. But yet
> you answer and continue to do so, therefore the problem is with you.
>
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
>
> To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared,
> are
> we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net.
> You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered.
> Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
>
> If I choose to skip 'large chunks of your argument' it is because
> they are so weak, that any response would be unfair on you. There is
> no need for thanks. And the 'points' as you call them have already
> been handed to me.
>
> JUST STOP. Now. For me ;)

How have any of you you become tangled in this net of a topic if it has so many holes?