The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?
Page:
P4NT$ wrote:
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about assumption, if not, learn it.
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
Because some people, such as you, are retards. Things need pointing out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole argument in jeopardy.
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on your rapid descent to failure.
Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
"choice you choose to answer and declare yourself retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This sentence does not make sense.
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared, are we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net. You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered. Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
> So you are calling the other members of this forum retards?
Did I say that? Did I hint at it? I did not. Therefore you are assuming I called them retards. You should know the saying about assumption, if not, learn it.
> If something is so obvious then why point it out?
Because some people, such as you, are retards. Things need pointing out.
> Inless your life is so
> simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In
> which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as
> the answer you made.
You have accepted here that I am pointing out the obvious. You accept that you are a retard. You declare that I am a retard for pointing it out. Surely a retard wouldn't be able to draw such a conclusion? By delcaring yourself a retard, you put your whole argument in jeopardy.
> You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may
> claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that
> .
To what extent does pessimism and optimism have to do with this argument? It seems to me you are clawing frantically at straws on your rapid descent to failure.
Furthermore, your sentence structure and use of words is appalling.
"choice you choose to answer and declare yourself retardedness". You have mixed tenses and adjectives. This sentence does not make sense.
> You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
Ah, here the hypocrite speaks. See above where you decided that I called fellow forumites retards when I did not. And yet here you chastise me for "supposed" assumptions. Surely if you did not have problems you wouldn't have posted such a retarded post?
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
>
> Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your
> absence.
To slip dangerously into alpha male territory here, "Scared, are we?" Your argument is seamless. It has more holes than a net. You have left large chunks of my argument unscanned and unanswered. Valuable points have been ignored, to your own peril.
Der Nazi wrote:
> Oh, how intelligent. He's using ASCII.
>
> Have all the letters packed up on your keyboard, or do you enjoy
> looking like a nerd who is deperately trying to impress people?
Why would I want to impress people I have never seen. Are you people on here so tightly knitted.
01010111 01101000 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101001 01101101 01110000 01110010 01100101 01110011 01110011 00100000 01110000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01001001 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100101 01101110 00101110 00100000 00100000 01000001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110011 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101001 01100111 01101000 01110100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101011 01101110 01101001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01100100 00101110
> Oh, how intelligent. He's using ASCII.
>
> Have all the letters packed up on your keyboard, or do you enjoy
> looking like a nerd who is deperately trying to impress people?
Why would I want to impress people I have never seen. Are you people on here so tightly knitted.
01010111 01101000 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101001 01101101 01110000 01110010 01100101 01110011 01110011 00100000 01110000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01001001 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100101 01101110 00101110 00100000 00100000 01000001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110011 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101001 01100111 01101000 01110100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101011 01101110 01101001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01100100 00101110
RoJ wrote:
>rebuttal
Aha.
>rebuttal
Aha.
DiscoDexy wrote:
> Der Nazi wrote:
> This 'P4NT$' guy is weird. Firstly, he tries to correct his own
> stupid
> mistakes by blabbering on, and secondly he obviously can't find the
> 'a' and 's' keys on his keyboard.
>
> and 3rdly by quoting everyone's posts he will be a regular in no
> time!
You think
> Der Nazi wrote:
> This 'P4NT$' guy is weird. Firstly, he tries to correct his own
> stupid
> mistakes by blabbering on, and secondly he obviously can't find the
> 'a' and 's' keys on his keyboard.
>
> and 3rdly by quoting everyone's posts he will be a regular in no
> time!
You think
Der Nazi wrote:
> This 'P4NT$' guy is weird. Firstly, he tries to correct his own stupid
> mistakes by blabbering on, and secondly he obviously can't find the
> 'a' and 's' keys on his keyboard.
and 3rdly by quoting everyone's posts he will be a regular in no time!
> This 'P4NT$' guy is weird. Firstly, he tries to correct his own stupid
> mistakes by blabbering on, and secondly he obviously can't find the
> 'a' and 's' keys on his keyboard.
and 3rdly by quoting everyone's posts he will be a regular in no time!
Oh, how intelligent. He's using ASCII.
Have all the letters packed up on your keyboard, or do you enjoy looking like a nerd who is deperately trying to impress people?
Have all the letters packed up on your keyboard, or do you enjoy looking like a nerd who is deperately trying to impress people?
01001101 01111001 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100111 01110101 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110010 01100101 01101101 01100001 01101001 01101110 01110011 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110010 01100101 01110100 01100001 01110010 01100100 00101110
This 'P4NT$' guy is weird. Firstly, he tries to correct his own stupid mistakes by blabbering on, and secondly he obviously can't find the 'a' and 's' keys on his keyboard.
RoJ wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> My case remains if said question is so retarded, then why does said
> question need said answer to prove that said question is retarded,
> this only proves the fact that said question is retarded but it also
> goes on to prove that said answer is equaly retared if not more so
> then said question,
>
> Ah no. You see, my answer was to inform you that you were a retard,
> if you did not already know that (in your set of circumstances you
> should have) and also to inform the other forumites as to your
> retarded status.
So you are calling the other members of this forum retards? If something is so obvious then why point it out? Inless your life is so simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as the answer you made.
> as the purpose of said answer is to state the
> obvious that said question is retarded which I think said question
> proves by it self.
>
> If the said question is retarded why did you, who you adamantly
> delcare that you are not retarded, post it? CLearly you thought it
> was clever, something you strive to be but in your state of life is
> next to impossible.
You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that choice you choose to answer and declare yourself retardedness.
You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
> So the man that declares a retarded post, thinly veiled by a pathetic
> attempt at intelligence retarded is retarded as well then? I think
> not.
>
> Your case on the event of said question has been lost, and I have
> won.
>
> Your case has been rebutted by myself, and alreasy I weary of this
> tiresome debate. Take a leave of absence and do not return, but if
> you must, come up again with more pathetic arguments and I will
> successfully rebutt each one unless your argument states that you are
> a retard. There is no possible rebuttal I can yet concive for that
> argument.
Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your absence.
> P4NT$ wrote:
> My case remains if said question is so retarded, then why does said
> question need said answer to prove that said question is retarded,
> this only proves the fact that said question is retarded but it also
> goes on to prove that said answer is equaly retared if not more so
> then said question,
>
> Ah no. You see, my answer was to inform you that you were a retard,
> if you did not already know that (in your set of circumstances you
> should have) and also to inform the other forumites as to your
> retarded status.
So you are calling the other members of this forum retards? If something is so obvious then why point it out? Inless your life is so simple that the obvious is the only comment you have to make? In which case this proves further that you yourself are as retarded as the answer you made.
> as the purpose of said answer is to state the
> obvious that said question is retarded which I think said question
> proves by it self.
>
> If the said question is retarded why did you, who you adamantly
> delcare that you are not retarded, post it? CLearly you thought it
> was clever, something you strive to be but in your state of life is
> next to impossible.
You have two choices the glass is half fall or half empty, some may claim more options, but the point remains it is choice. And in that choice you choose to answer and declare yourself retardedness.
You do not know my state of life, do not make assumptions.
> Therefore said author of said answer in response
> to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said
> question.
>
> So the man that declares a retarded post, thinly veiled by a pathetic
> attempt at intelligence retarded is retarded as well then? I think
> not.
>
> Your case on the event of said question has been lost, and I have
> won.
>
> Your case has been rebutted by myself, and alreasy I weary of this
> tiresome debate. Take a leave of absence and do not return, but if
> you must, come up again with more pathetic arguments and I will
> successfully rebutt each one unless your argument states that you are
> a retard. There is no possible rebuttal I can yet concive for that
> argument.
Your argument is becoming thin on the ground I suggest you take your absence.
Ello.
Page: