The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
Page:
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Timmargh wrote:
> The entire story was based around a ring, which was destroyed at the
> end of the 3rd instalment. What do you propose they write the next
> instalment about?
>
> A gay porn, where Frodo and Sam get it on. I mean, it nearly happened
> at the end of ROTK. ;)
Did Saruman get killed at the end of the Return of the King? If not, I always imagined him and Gandalf getting it on.
> Timmargh wrote:
> The entire story was based around a ring, which was destroyed at the
> end of the 3rd instalment. What do you propose they write the next
> instalment about?
>
> A gay porn, where Frodo and Sam get it on. I mean, it nearly happened
> at the end of ROTK. ;)
Did Saruman get killed at the end of the Return of the King? If not, I always imagined him and Gandalf getting it on.
Timmargh wrote:
> What do you propose they write the next instalment about?
Sam's enchanted potato?
> What do you propose they write the next instalment about?
Sam's enchanted potato?
Timmargh wrote:
> The entire story was based around a ring, which was destroyed at the
> end of the 3rd instalment. What do you propose they write the next
> instalment about?
A gay porn, where Frodo and Sam get it on. I mean, it nearly happened at the end of ROTK. ;)
> The entire story was based around a ring, which was destroyed at the
> end of the 3rd instalment. What do you propose they write the next
> instalment about?
A gay porn, where Frodo and Sam get it on. I mean, it nearly happened at the end of ROTK. ;)
2113 wrote:
> i mean if they carried on the story and made an extra film just for fun.
*****
The entire story was based around a ring, which was destroyed at the end of the 3rd instalment. What do you propose they write the next instalment about?
> i mean if they carried on the story and made an extra film just for fun.
*****
The entire story was based around a ring, which was destroyed at the end of the 3rd instalment. What do you propose they write the next instalment about?
cipro wrote:
> 10 out of 10 wrote:
> I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they
> were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
>
> That's because there are only three books on which the films are
> based.
i mean if they carried on the story and made an extra film just for fun.
> 10 out of 10 wrote:
> I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they
> were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
>
> That's because there are only three books on which the films are
> based.
i mean if they carried on the story and made an extra film just for fun.
Timmargh wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> What??
> *****
>
> I was expressing my despair at this guys topics.
Oh right. Yeah, it's pathetic.
> Wakka wrote:
> What??
> *****
>
> I was expressing my despair at this guys topics.
Oh right. Yeah, it's pathetic.
10 out of 10 wrote:
> I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they
> were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
Try reading the books. They are a different beast entirely (thinks to self, "If this guy / gal has EVER picked up a book out of choice, I'll be astounded")
> I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they
> were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
Try reading the books. They are a different beast entirely (thinks to self, "If this guy / gal has EVER picked up a book out of choice, I'll be astounded")
2113 wrote:
> do you like lotr?
*****
Lord Of The Rings? Yes, I do.
> do you like lotr?
*****
Lord Of The Rings? Yes, I do.
10 out of 10 wrote:
> I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they
> were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
That's because there are only three books on which the films are based.
> I love the lord of the rings seen all three films and thought they
> were thrilling its a same there's only 3 parts.
That's because there are only three books on which the films are based.
Wakka wrote:
> What??
*****
I was expressing my despair at this guys topics.
> What??
*****
I was expressing my despair at this guys topics.
Page: