The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I heard two people talking about this the other night, and was wondering what you guys thought. Is being gay in your DNA, or is it 'acquired' through your life?
So yeh, enlighten me...
So yeh, enlighten me...
Page:
Cub!st wrote:
>
> Good point Cubist! These people don't know jack so everything the say
> is just a wild guess backed up by some T.V. show they watched or some
> magazine they read. They are totally clueless.
Ok I'll make a random stab in the dark (heh), I expect it's different for each gay person how they find out/discover they're gay some people might know from birth whilst some might realise when they're 40 or something.
>
> Good point Cubist! These people don't know jack so everything the say
> is just a wild guess backed up by some T.V. show they watched or some
> magazine they read. They are totally clueless.
Ok I'll make a random stab in the dark (heh), I expect it's different for each gay person how they find out/discover they're gay some people might know from birth whilst some might realise when they're 40 or something.
What do you know about the subject then, Cub!st?
It is about 6000 Jewish years old, yes.
Cub!st wrote:
> Errr is a forum populated by prodominantly straight people really the
> best place to pose this question? Face it you can only speculate. You
> can argue the same for gay people but at least they have experienced
> it so are more qualified to reply no?
Good point Cubist! These people don't know jack so everything the say is just a wild guess backed up by some T.V. show they watched or some magazine they read. They are totally clueless.
> Errr is a forum populated by prodominantly straight people really the
> best place to pose this question? Face it you can only speculate. You
> can argue the same for gay people but at least they have experienced
> it so are more qualified to reply no?
Good point Cubist! These people don't know jack so everything the say is just a wild guess backed up by some T.V. show they watched or some magazine they read. They are totally clueless.
Forest Fan wrote:
>
> The Bible talks about years (Jewish years) that is.
So is the earth 6000 Jewish years old then?
>
> The Bible talks about years (Jewish years) that is.
So is the earth 6000 Jewish years old then?
Mav wrote:
> Ah yes.
>
> Doesn't a jolly man dressed in festive red clothing, who gives
> presents away to happy children, just strike you as the all-powerful
> anti-christ?
If you sit on his lap as a kid and he gets 'excited', then yes anti-christ seems about right.
> Ah yes.
>
> Doesn't a jolly man dressed in festive red clothing, who gives
> presents away to happy children, just strike you as the all-powerful
> anti-christ?
If you sit on his lap as a kid and he gets 'excited', then yes anti-christ seems about right.
Hedfix wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
> 365 1/4 days or slightly less in Jewish years.
>
> Where's it say that in the Bible?
The Bible talks about years (Jewish years) that is.
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
> 365 1/4 days or slightly less in Jewish years.
>
> Where's it say that in the Bible?
The Bible talks about years (Jewish years) that is.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> And Sumerian cuneiform Pre-dates this, by quite a significant amount
> of time eh forest fan? *They* have their own creation myths.
>
> No Pandaemonium, wrong Genesis was written in about 3,500 BC,
> several
> thousand years before you guessed, though that is the style of
> evolution, guesswork.
>
> I thought the view was that god wrote genesis, through moses, and he
> lived approx 1527 BC?
No, 2000 years before then.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> And Sumerian cuneiform Pre-dates this, by quite a significant amount
> of time eh forest fan? *They* have their own creation myths.
>
> No Pandaemonium, wrong Genesis was written in about 3,500 BC,
> several
> thousand years before you guessed, though that is the style of
> evolution, guesswork.
>
> I thought the view was that god wrote genesis, through moses, and he
> lived approx 1527 BC?
No, 2000 years before then.
Mav wrote:
> Ah yes.
>
> Doesn't a jolly man dressed in festive red clothing, who gives
> presents away to happy children, just strike you as the all-powerful
> anti-christ?
He does actually, funnily enough, because the anti-christ is going to look like a great man, but really he is decieving people. Just like Santa.
> Ah yes.
>
> Doesn't a jolly man dressed in festive red clothing, who gives
> presents away to happy children, just strike you as the all-powerful
> anti-christ?
He does actually, funnily enough, because the anti-christ is going to look like a great man, but really he is decieving people. Just like Santa.
Forest Fan wrote:
> And Sumerian cuneiform Pre-dates this, by quite a significant amount
> of time eh forest fan? *They* have their own creation myths.
>
> No Pandaemonium, wrong Genesis was written in about 3,500 BC, several
> thousand years before you guessed, though that is the style of
> evolution, guesswork.
I thought the view was that god wrote genesis, through moses, and he lived approx 1527 BC?
> And Sumerian cuneiform Pre-dates this, by quite a significant amount
> of time eh forest fan? *They* have their own creation myths.
>
> No Pandaemonium, wrong Genesis was written in about 3,500 BC, several
> thousand years before you guessed, though that is the style of
> evolution, guesswork.
I thought the view was that god wrote genesis, through moses, and he lived approx 1527 BC?
Page: