The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I heard two people talking about this the other night, and was wondering what you guys thought. Is being gay in your DNA, or is it 'acquired' through your life?
So yeh, enlighten me...
So yeh, enlighten me...
Page:
Hilarious.
Aaaanyway, according to my Youth Leader the Bible talks about "huge beasts" or something like that - it's how you choose to interpret it. I'd have to ask him for the specific reference.
Personally, I think they're dragons. :P
Aaaanyway, according to my Youth Leader the Bible talks about "huge beasts" or something like that - it's how you choose to interpret it. I'd have to ask him for the specific reference.
Personally, I think they're dragons. :P
Ant wrote:
> Light wrote:
> I'm afraid that I'm not so insecure in myself that an implication of
> >stupidity from a boy who thinks dinosaurs lived side by side with
> humans >would phase me.
>
> Well actually, it's rather possible that the Dinosaurs were described
> in the Bible...so, if you believe in the Bible, then Meester Forest
> could in fact be correct.
>
> :P
Oooh, y'little mischief maker you!
Okay, I'll bite; whereabouts are they described in the Bible...and if you say "The serpent in the Garden of Eden", I will yell at you!
> Light wrote:
> I'm afraid that I'm not so insecure in myself that an implication of
> >stupidity from a boy who thinks dinosaurs lived side by side with
> humans >would phase me.
>
> Well actually, it's rather possible that the Dinosaurs were described
> in the Bible...so, if you believe in the Bible, then Meester Forest
> could in fact be correct.
>
> :P
Oooh, y'little mischief maker you!
Okay, I'll bite; whereabouts are they described in the Bible...and if you say "The serpent in the Garden of Eden", I will yell at you!
Ant wrote:
> Well actually, it's rather possible that the Dinosaurs were described
> in the Bible...
Where?
From Bill Hicks.
"You know the world's 12 thousand years old and dinosaurs existed, they existed in that time, you'd think it would have been mentioned in the f****** Bible at some point.
"And lo Jesus and the disciples walked to Nazareth. But the trail was blocked by a giant brontosaurus... with a splinter in his paw.
And O the disciples did run a shriekin':
'What a big F****** lizard, Lord!' But Jesus was unafraid and he took the splinter from the brontosaurus's paw and the big lizard became his friend.
And Jesus sent him to Scotland where he lived in a loch for O so many years inviting thousands of American tourists to bring their fat f****** families and their fat dollar bills.
And oh Scotland did praise the Lord.
Thank you Lord, thank you Lord. Thank you Lord."
> Well actually, it's rather possible that the Dinosaurs were described
> in the Bible...
Where?
From Bill Hicks.
"You know the world's 12 thousand years old and dinosaurs existed, they existed in that time, you'd think it would have been mentioned in the f****** Bible at some point.
"And lo Jesus and the disciples walked to Nazareth. But the trail was blocked by a giant brontosaurus... with a splinter in his paw.
And O the disciples did run a shriekin':
'What a big F****** lizard, Lord!' But Jesus was unafraid and he took the splinter from the brontosaurus's paw and the big lizard became his friend.
And Jesus sent him to Scotland where he lived in a loch for O so many years inviting thousands of American tourists to bring their fat f****** families and their fat dollar bills.
And oh Scotland did praise the Lord.
Thank you Lord, thank you Lord. Thank you Lord."
Light wrote:
> I'm afraid that I'm not so insecure in myself that an implication of >stupidity from a boy who thinks dinosaurs lived side by side with humans >would phase me.
Well actually, it's rather possible that the Dinosaurs were described in the Bible...so, if you believe in the Bible, then Meester Forest could in fact be correct.
:P
> I'm afraid that I'm not so insecure in myself that an implication of >stupidity from a boy who thinks dinosaurs lived side by side with humans >would phase me.
Well actually, it's rather possible that the Dinosaurs were described in the Bible...so, if you believe in the Bible, then Meester Forest could in fact be correct.
:P
English_Bloke wrote:
> I find it funny that we're talking about Forest eating meat in this
> thread.
Bwah ha ha ha haaa! Y'know, I'd not considered that aspect of this farce...
> I find it funny that we're talking about Forest eating meat in this
> thread.
Bwah ha ha ha haaa! Y'know, I'd not considered that aspect of this farce...
Forest Fan wrote:
> Light - does everything have to be over-simplified for you? I give you
> credit and think you can take the initative to understand simple
> concepts. Obviously not. In a restaurant - yes like the one I went to
> on Saturday - the Harvester and I chose some sort of lamb steak I
> asked for it well done. 'Kay?
Heheheheh. It's fun watching you get more and more annoyed at being questioned. Sorta gives away your totalitarian leanings.
Now heres the thing; in this very thread you've said you get steak "medium or well done" when you eat out. Now you're trying to say that you only eat it well done. So which of your posts are you lying in? This one, or the ones where you admit to eating medium steak?
The reason I ask you to clarify so completely is because you've told so many lies that are at odds with each other. I'm afraid that I'm not so insecure in myself that an implication of stupidity from a boy who thinks dinosaurs lived side by side with humans would phase me. So unfortunately for you, I'm going to continue to ask you to make everything you say crystal clear. That way, it's rather more difficult for you to lie. Though your cowardice is, I see, undiminished. But please, do continue with your efforts to stop me questioning you. I enjoy seeing you try and run away to avoid answering.
Incidentally, English Bloke has confirmed there that steak contains blood. So you, having eaten a medium steak, have broken the New Covenant. Hypocrite.
> Light - does everything have to be over-simplified for you? I give you
> credit and think you can take the initative to understand simple
> concepts. Obviously not. In a restaurant - yes like the one I went to
> on Saturday - the Harvester and I chose some sort of lamb steak I
> asked for it well done. 'Kay?
Heheheheh. It's fun watching you get more and more annoyed at being questioned. Sorta gives away your totalitarian leanings.
Now heres the thing; in this very thread you've said you get steak "medium or well done" when you eat out. Now you're trying to say that you only eat it well done. So which of your posts are you lying in? This one, or the ones where you admit to eating medium steak?
The reason I ask you to clarify so completely is because you've told so many lies that are at odds with each other. I'm afraid that I'm not so insecure in myself that an implication of stupidity from a boy who thinks dinosaurs lived side by side with humans would phase me. So unfortunately for you, I'm going to continue to ask you to make everything you say crystal clear. That way, it's rather more difficult for you to lie. Though your cowardice is, I see, undiminished. But please, do continue with your efforts to stop me questioning you. I enjoy seeing you try and run away to avoid answering.
Incidentally, English Bloke has confirmed there that steak contains blood. So you, having eaten a medium steak, have broken the New Covenant. Hypocrite.
I find it funny that we're talking about Forest eating meat in this thread.
Steak has blood in it
Light wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> Thankyou - that needed pointing out to Light. Eating out - my steak
> is usually medium or well done. When cooked at home - well done.
> This
> also points out that when you buy the steak - it is not dripping in
> blood.
>
> And I never said it was dripping in blood, did I? C'mon Gump; point
> out where I said this.
>
> So you eat a medium steak when eating out? Then you've eaten blood.
> Hypocrite.
I've never eaten blood. Beef cleansed and then cooked well will contain no blood.
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> Thankyou - that needed pointing out to Light. Eating out - my steak
> is usually medium or well done. When cooked at home - well done.
> This
> also points out that when you buy the steak - it is not dripping in
> blood.
>
> And I never said it was dripping in blood, did I? C'mon Gump; point
> out where I said this.
>
> So you eat a medium steak when eating out? Then you've eaten blood.
> Hypocrite.
Light - does everything have to be over-simplified for you? I give you credit and think you can take the initative to understand simple concepts. Obviously not. In a restaurant - yes like the one I went to on Saturday - the Harvester and I chose some sort of lamb steak I asked for it well done. 'Kay?
Page: