The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I heard two people talking about this the other night, and was wondering what you guys thought. Is being gay in your DNA, or is it 'acquired' through your life?
So yeh, enlighten me...
So yeh, enlighten me...
Page:
I know this is a generalisation but i'll say it anyway. Why is it that gay people "act gay"? Why cant gay men still just act like normal men? Why do they have to be all camp and friuty? Why dont they do normal men style things but just happen to like the same sex rather than being all girly?
*laughs*
Archangel wrote:
> Thanks, FF. I haven't figured out the "Click here" thingy
> yet, of how to post it. (Remember, I'm old. It takes me a little
> longer to figure it out.)
OK. It's quite simple, but it took me and others a little while to figure out, so here's how to do all the tags:
TAGS:
Below is how to write the word 'apple' through different commands, you can also combine commands.
Bold: apple
Italic: apple
Underline: apple
Small: apple
*Press reply and quote message to see how or check out under the post box.
----------------------------
Link: [URL]http://www.cjf.org/[/URL] To do link, you must put [URL] http://www.cjf.org/[/URL], but you line up the '[URL]' and '[/URL]' tags so they are right next to 'apple'. When naming the website, you must put http:// before the name of the website.
Hope this helps.
> Thanks, FF. I haven't figured out the "Click here" thingy
> yet, of how to post it. (Remember, I'm old. It takes me a little
> longer to figure it out.)
OK. It's quite simple, but it took me and others a little while to figure out, so here's how to do all the tags:
TAGS:
Below is how to write the word 'apple' through different commands, you can also combine commands.
Bold: apple
Italic: apple
Underline: apple
Small: apple
*Press reply and quote message to see how or check out under the post box.
----------------------------
Link: [URL]http://www.cjf.org/[/URL] To do link, you must put [URL] http://www.cjf.org/[/URL], but you line up the '[URL]' and '[/URL]' tags so they are right next to 'apple'. When naming the website, you must put http:// before the name of the website.
Hope this helps.
You don't say.
As for your problem, look just to the right of the post box.
As for your problem, look just to the right of the post box.
"Thanks." I don't think I've ever been scoffed.
Har, I scoff at you!
Thanks, FF. I haven't figured out the "Click here" thingy yet, of how to post it. (Remember, I'm old. It takes me a little longer to figure it out.)
Archangel wrote:
> Concerning the Christian Jew:
>
> Check out CJF.org. It is the site for the Christian Jew Foundation.
([URL]http://www.cjf.org/[/URL])
> Concerning the Christian Jew:
>
> Check out CJF.org. It is the site for the Christian Jew Foundation.
([URL]http://www.cjf.org/[/URL])
Concerning the Christian Jew:
Check out CJF.org. It is the site for the Christian Jew Foundation.
Check out CJF.org. It is the site for the Christian Jew Foundation.
Leviticus 17:10-16: concerning the eating of blood:
Matthew Henry commentary, one volume edition, page 131, exposition on verses 10-16 of Leviticus 17:
"We have here, A repetition and confirmation of the law against eating blood. We have met with this prohibition twice before in the levitical law (ch. iii. 17: vii, 26), beside the place it had in the precepts of Noah, Gen. ix. 4. But here, 1. The prohibition is repeated again and again, and reference had to the former laws to this purport (v. 12). A great stress is laid upon it, as a law which has more in it than at first view one would think. 2. It is made binding, not only on the house of Israel, but on the strangers that sojourned among them (v. 10). 3. The penalty annexed to this law is very severe (v. 10). 4. A reason is given for this law (v. 11): because it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul. The sinner deserved to die; therefore the sacrifice must die. Now, the blood being so--that ordinarily beasts were killed for man's use by the drawing out of all their blood--God appointed the sprinkling or pouring out of the blood of the sacrifice upon the altar to signify that the life of the sacrifice was given to god instead of the sinner's life, and as a ransom or counterprice for it; therefore without shedding of blood there was no remission, Heb. ix. 22. For this reason they must eat no blood, and, (1) It was then a very good reason; for God would by this means preserve the honour of that way of atonement which he had instituted. But, (2) This reason is now superceded, which intimates that the law itself was ceremonial, and is now no longer in force: the blood of Christ who has come is that alone which makes atonement for the soul, and of which the blood of the sacrifices was an imperfect type. The blood, provided it be so prepared as not to be unwholesome, is now allowed for the nourishment of our bodies, because it is no longer appointed to make an atonement for the soul."
Matthew Henry commentary, one volume edition, page 131, exposition on verses 10-16 of Leviticus 17:
"We have here, A repetition and confirmation of the law against eating blood. We have met with this prohibition twice before in the levitical law (ch. iii. 17: vii, 26), beside the place it had in the precepts of Noah, Gen. ix. 4. But here, 1. The prohibition is repeated again and again, and reference had to the former laws to this purport (v. 12). A great stress is laid upon it, as a law which has more in it than at first view one would think. 2. It is made binding, not only on the house of Israel, but on the strangers that sojourned among them (v. 10). 3. The penalty annexed to this law is very severe (v. 10). 4. A reason is given for this law (v. 11): because it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul. The sinner deserved to die; therefore the sacrifice must die. Now, the blood being so--that ordinarily beasts were killed for man's use by the drawing out of all their blood--God appointed the sprinkling or pouring out of the blood of the sacrifice upon the altar to signify that the life of the sacrifice was given to god instead of the sinner's life, and as a ransom or counterprice for it; therefore without shedding of blood there was no remission, Heb. ix. 22. For this reason they must eat no blood, and, (1) It was then a very good reason; for God would by this means preserve the honour of that way of atonement which he had instituted. But, (2) This reason is now superceded, which intimates that the law itself was ceremonial, and is now no longer in force: the blood of Christ who has come is that alone which makes atonement for the soul, and of which the blood of the sacrifices was an imperfect type. The blood, provided it be so prepared as not to be unwholesome, is now allowed for the nourishment of our bodies, because it is no longer appointed to make an atonement for the soul."
Page: