The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
>
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
> the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet effective
> fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe
> was CREATED.
And by the way, they didnt find we were made from dust, just that we contain some of the same particles contained in dust, as is the case with many many things on Earth and beyond. Theres a big difference there that you are missing.
>
> What's not to get.
Whats not to get? Stars do not pop up overnight, thats what! They take thousands of years to form into what we see, and what we see is many thousands of years old!
> Jackus wrote:
> No, that's YOUR only explanation. Mine is I pulled the universe and
> everything straight from between my toes.
>
>
> Good explanantion. I tend to not really care too much about such
> minor things.
Didn't make any sense, having said that it made more sense then the sea-slimed centred cult myth of Evolution. Creation is the Truth though.
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
> the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet effective
> fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe
> was CREATED.
There is evidence of a large localised flood, not a infidel-drowning miracle, and joseph was allegedly a merchnt who took all of that gear so he could sell it.
I have to go now however, as lame as that sounds, it is true. I may see you later.
(I in no way think this means I have won the arguement, but the same goes for you.)
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust is made from, atomically speaking.
> So you don't believe we're descended from apes?
No, we didn't. I can be 100% sure of that. Sorry if that sounds arrogant but that is just my conviction of the Creation of the universe.
If you're trying to
> shove your opinion down other people's throats, it won't work.
Just informing people of how the Creation is written as fact in the Bible.
> All we have are religious texts and scientific knowledge that try to
> prove both theories. Now, what would an average person think, if
> confronted with the two?
Depends whether if in there childhood when they went to school, evolution was shoved down their throats and they never heard of how God Created the world. If the person was clever and was on the narrow path (which leads to life) he would go with Creation, but if he was on the broad path (which leads to death) he would go with Evolution.
An average person would most likely go with Evolution, but then your average person is most likely not saved.
> No, that's YOUR only explanation. Mine is I pulled the universe and
> everything straight from between my toes.
Good explanantion. I tend to not really care too much about such minor things.
> It is an unfortunate truth that fossils do not emerge from the ground
> with labels already attached to them. And it is bad enough that much
> of the labeling was done in the name of egoism and a naive lack of
> appreciation of variation between individuals; each nuance in shape
> was taken to indicate a difference in type rather than natural
> variation within a population.
Says it all really. Have you ever tried looking back across several million years of history with only the odd bone that you can dig up to look at, across the entire surface of the planet? It is damn hard to find preserved skelletons of any species, let alone one particular one in millions, over millions of years. The rest of that spam of a post was just focusing on the very small part of archeology that has taken it upon itself to falsify results. This falsifying unfortunately does happen in a few circumstances, across all the spectrum of science. Anyway, this discussion should be in the Evolution thread really. This thread is for other purposes.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
> Well I was doing my duty of informing you, exactly what I am.
>
>
> Personally, I think we all should have one label and one label only
> for what we are, humam being. Religion is not what you are, neither
> is gender, race or sexual orientation in my opinion. It is a part of
> who you are, which to me is totally different.
>
> We are human beings, we are different to the animals. Anyone can see
> that, we rule the animals, us humans are the ones that put them in
> cages or in zoos. Us humans sort out the food to give to the
> domestic
> animals. This is proof that we are different and have a spirit,
> which
> animals DON'T have, hence we have a spiritual decision to make,
> follow Jesus or reject Jesus.
>
> It proves we have thumbs you jackass.
>
> And would you shut the feck up about Jesus and how evoloution is a
> load of lies. I really, really don't care what you think you know
> about evoloution. Just tell what proof you have as to "God
> created the earth"
In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet effective fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe was CREATED.