The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Wanna know how it's easy to spot?
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
Page:
Britney Spears cleavage is proof of God, because, well, how could something so divine evolve from a hairy monkey?
We're not made from dust.
We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single piece of everything in the entire universe.
We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single piece of everything in the entire universe.
Lindgren wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> What's not to get.
>
> Whats not to get? Stars do not pop up overnight, thats what! They
> take thousands of years to form into what we see, and what we see is
> many thousands of years old!
"Many thousands of years old", the universe is many thousands of years old. Anyway the Lord Created the Earth and some of the planets, to prove the immensity of God, hence the time it takes for a star to form. This shows how out of time God is, this is PROOF OF GOD.
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> What's not to get.
>
> Whats not to get? Stars do not pop up overnight, thats what! They
> take thousands of years to form into what we see, and what we see is
> many thousands of years old!
"Many thousands of years old", the universe is many thousands of years old. Anyway the Lord Created the Earth and some of the planets, to prove the immensity of God, hence the time it takes for a star to form. This shows how out of time God is, this is PROOF OF GOD.
Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
>
> They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust
> is
> made from, atomically speaking.
>
> Heh. Excellent.
>
> ???
>
> They also showed that we are made from the same stuff, anatomically
> speaking, as dogs, cats, flowers, fish, bacteria, mud, dust,
> spiderwebs, blah blah bla. Why is this so exciting?
Because scientists use to believe this was a load of rubbish, hence evolution is comprimising as its theories are disproved. I have disproved other aspects of it, but you have just ignored the point and pretended you didn't understand.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
>
> They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust
> is
> made from, atomically speaking.
>
> Heh. Excellent.
>
> ???
>
> They also showed that we are made from the same stuff, anatomically
> speaking, as dogs, cats, flowers, fish, bacteria, mud, dust,
> spiderwebs, blah blah bla. Why is this so exciting?
Because scientists use to believe this was a load of rubbish, hence evolution is comprimising as its theories are disproved. I have disproved other aspects of it, but you have just ignored the point and pretended you didn't understand.
Unbeliever wrote:
> The Bible IS fictional. It hasn't been transcribed originally and
> there are numerous additions and rewrites. Unlike the Talmud and
> Koran which have been faithful to their original text.
The Bible is not fictional, it is a historical account like any other book. What sets it apart is the prophecies in the book.
Unebeliever, the Bible has simply been translated, because like I have already mentioned, there are few people who can speak Ancient Hebrew, Ancient Aramaic and Ancient Greek. Other books like the Koran have been translated from their original languages as well.
> The Bible IS fictional. It hasn't been transcribed originally and
> there are numerous additions and rewrites. Unlike the Talmud and
> Koran which have been faithful to their original text.
The Bible is not fictional, it is a historical account like any other book. What sets it apart is the prophecies in the book.
Unebeliever, the Bible has simply been translated, because like I have already mentioned, there are few people who can speak Ancient Hebrew, Ancient Aramaic and Ancient Greek. Other books like the Koran have been translated from their original languages as well.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
>
> They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust
> is
> made from, atomically speaking.
>
> Heh. Excellent.
???
They also showed that we are made from the same stuff, anatomically speaking, as dogs, cats, flowers, fish, bacteria, mud, dust, spiderwebs, blah blah bla. Why is this so exciting?
> Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
>
> They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust
> is
> made from, atomically speaking.
>
> Heh. Excellent.
???
They also showed that we are made from the same stuff, anatomically speaking, as dogs, cats, flowers, fish, bacteria, mud, dust, spiderwebs, blah blah bla. Why is this so exciting?
Jackus wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
> the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet
> effective
> fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe
> was CREATED.
>
> There is evidence of a large localised flood, not a infidel-drowning
> miracle, and joseph was allegedly a merchnt who took all of that gear
> so he could sell it.
There is plenty of evidence for the flood of Noah's day, what has Joseph got to do with anything?
>
> I have to go now however, as lame as that sounds, it is true. I may
> see you later.
>
> (I in no way think this means I have won the arguement, but the same
> goes for you.)
No, off you go.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
> the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet
> effective
> fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe
> was CREATED.
>
> There is evidence of a large localised flood, not a infidel-drowning
> miracle, and joseph was allegedly a merchnt who took all of that gear
> so he could sell it.
There is plenty of evidence for the flood of Noah's day, what has Joseph got to do with anything?
>
> I have to go now however, as lame as that sounds, it is true. I may
> see you later.
>
> (I in no way think this means I have won the arguement, but the same
> goes for you.)
No, off you go.
Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
>
> They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust is
> made from, atomically speaking.
Heh. Excellent.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
>
> They found that we are made from the same stuff as that which dust is
> made from, atomically speaking.
Heh. Excellent.
Unbeliever wrote:
> I was always of the opinion that if we have descended from apes, then
> why do apes still exist? Surely the "survival of the
> fittest" means that the apes would have died out and only humans
> remain? Personally I don't believe in the theory of evolution.
> However, I'm not religious in any way or form either. Put that in
> your pipe and smoke it!
Think of evolution as a tree diagram. Species evolve in a line down a branch; occasionally a branch will split into two or more seperate branches. These branches continue on their separate ways, creating common ancestors for two seperate species. Sometimes branches come to an end; the species dies out. This is an evolutionary dead-end.
At some point in history we diverged from the apes. This could be caused by, say some members of the species migrate and so over time develop differently (one current theory is that humans split from apes when some apes migrated to the coast and developed different lifestyles). There are many reasons why a species may split down two different branches.
> I was always of the opinion that if we have descended from apes, then
> why do apes still exist? Surely the "survival of the
> fittest" means that the apes would have died out and only humans
> remain? Personally I don't believe in the theory of evolution.
> However, I'm not religious in any way or form either. Put that in
> your pipe and smoke it!
Think of evolution as a tree diagram. Species evolve in a line down a branch; occasionally a branch will split into two or more seperate branches. These branches continue on their separate ways, creating common ancestors for two seperate species. Sometimes branches come to an end; the species dies out. This is an evolutionary dead-end.
At some point in history we diverged from the apes. This could be caused by, say some members of the species migrate and so over time develop differently (one current theory is that humans split from apes when some apes migrated to the coast and developed different lifestyles). There are many reasons why a species may split down two different branches.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> Jackus wrote:
> No, that's YOUR only explanation. Mine is I pulled the universe and
> everything straight from between my toes.
>
>
> Good explanantion. I tend to not really care too much about such
> minor things.
>
> Didn't make any sense, having said that it made more sense then the
> sea-slimed centred cult myth of Evolution. Creation is the Truth
> though.
This is insanity personified. Creation is the Truth? Any more moribund cliches?
I was always of the opinion that if we have descended from apes, then why do apes still exist? Surely the "survival of the fittest" means that the apes would have died out and only humans remain? Personally I don't believe in the theory of evolution. However, I'm not religious in any way or form either. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
> Unbeliever wrote:
> Jackus wrote:
> No, that's YOUR only explanation. Mine is I pulled the universe and
> everything straight from between my toes.
>
>
> Good explanantion. I tend to not really care too much about such
> minor things.
>
> Didn't make any sense, having said that it made more sense then the
> sea-slimed centred cult myth of Evolution. Creation is the Truth
> though.
This is insanity personified. Creation is the Truth? Any more moribund cliches?
I was always of the opinion that if we have descended from apes, then why do apes still exist? Surely the "survival of the fittest" means that the apes would have died out and only humans remain? Personally I don't believe in the theory of evolution. However, I'm not religious in any way or form either. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
Page: