The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Wanna know how it's easy to spot?
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
Page:
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
>
> And by that wonderful (really wonderful, gold star) logic, we're all
> made of grass, and cats, and paper, and windows, and bees, and
> polystyrene, and clouds, and cheese, and marbles as well.
>
> Which we are.
> The bible could have said God made human's from his ass crust. It'd
> be right, in that beautifully round-about way of yours.
No, because that would not be true and proven, unlike the fact we have the same particles as dust.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
>
> And by that wonderful (really wonderful, gold star) logic, we're all
> made of grass, and cats, and paper, and windows, and bees, and
> polystyrene, and clouds, and cheese, and marbles as well.
>
> Which we are.
> The bible could have said God made human's from his ass crust. It'd
> be right, in that beautifully round-about way of yours.
No, because that would not be true and proven, unlike the fact we have the same particles as dust.
Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because scientists use to believe this was a load of rubbish, hence
> evolution is comprimising as its theories are disproved. I have
> disproved other aspects of it, but you have just ignored the point
> and pretended you didn't understand.
>
> Why is evolution compromised by this? The theory of evolution has
> nothing based on atomic structures. This is akin to your last try
> with thermodynamics.
Evolution is compromised, because every few years another Creation fact is proved by science, after years of mockery, just like the one about dust. Of course science had no answer.
>
> You obviously do not understand how theories are formed and
> proved/disproved.
No, I do.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because scientists use to believe this was a load of rubbish, hence
> evolution is comprimising as its theories are disproved. I have
> disproved other aspects of it, but you have just ignored the point
> and pretended you didn't understand.
>
> Why is evolution compromised by this? The theory of evolution has
> nothing based on atomic structures. This is akin to your last try
> with thermodynamics.
Evolution is compromised, because every few years another Creation fact is proved by science, after years of mockery, just like the one about dust. Of course science had no answer.
>
> You obviously do not understand how theories are formed and
> proved/disproved.
No, I do.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
And by that wonderful (really wonderful, gold star) logic, we're all made of grass, and cats, and paper, and windows, and bees, and polystyrene, and clouds, and cheese, and marbles as well.
Which we are.
The bible could have said God made human's from his ass crust. It'd be right, in that beautifully round-about way of yours.
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
And by that wonderful (really wonderful, gold star) logic, we're all made of grass, and cats, and paper, and windows, and bees, and polystyrene, and clouds, and cheese, and marbles as well.
Which we are.
The bible could have said God made human's from his ass crust. It'd be right, in that beautifully round-about way of yours.
Tallan wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> We're not made from dust.
> We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single
> piece of everything in the entire universe.
>
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
>
> If you must know, all atoms on earth were created in the nuclear
> reactions inside stars. Thus, if anything, we are all made of
> stardust.
All atoms were CREATED as you say, but they were CREATED by the Lord God, just like everything else. If anything, which we are, we are made of dust, like the Book of Truth says.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> We're not made from dust.
> We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single
> piece of everything in the entire universe.
>
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
>
> If you must know, all atoms on earth were created in the nuclear
> reactions inside stars. Thus, if anything, we are all made of
> stardust.
All atoms were CREATED as you say, but they were CREATED by the Lord God, just like everything else. If anything, which we are, we are made of dust, like the Book of Truth says.
English_Bloke wrote:
> Britney Spears cleavage is proof of God, because, well, how could
> something so divine evolve from a hairy monkey?
Well there you go. Exactly, God made women as the fairer sex, i.e. less hairy. Of course Evolution cannot account for this.
> Britney Spears cleavage is proof of God, because, well, how could
> something so divine evolve from a hairy monkey?
Well there you go. Exactly, God made women as the fairer sex, i.e. less hairy. Of course Evolution cannot account for this.
Unbeliever wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> Jackus wrote:
> No, that's YOUR only explanation. Mine is I pulled the universe and
> everything straight from between my toes.
>
>
> Good explanantion. I tend to not really care too much about such
> minor things.
>
> Didn't make any sense, having said that it made more sense then the
> sea-slimed centred cult myth of Evolution. Creation is the Truth
> though.
>
> This is insanity personified. Creation is the Truth? Any more
> moribund cliches?
Creation is the fact written about in Genesis.
>
> I was always of the opinion that if we have descended from apes, then
> why do apes still exist? Surely the "survival of the
> fittest" means that the apes would have died out and only humans
> remain? Personally I don't believe in the theory of evolution.
> However, I'm not religious in any way or form either. Put that in
> your pipe and smoke it!
So you're not an evolutionist. Good, because you realise we don't come from sea slime and monkeys. How do you believe the earth was formed/Created?
P.S. I don't smoke!
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> Jackus wrote:
> No, that's YOUR only explanation. Mine is I pulled the universe and
> everything straight from between my toes.
>
>
> Good explanantion. I tend to not really care too much about such
> minor things.
>
> Didn't make any sense, having said that it made more sense then the
> sea-slimed centred cult myth of Evolution. Creation is the Truth
> though.
>
> This is insanity personified. Creation is the Truth? Any more
> moribund cliches?
Creation is the fact written about in Genesis.
>
> I was always of the opinion that if we have descended from apes, then
> why do apes still exist? Surely the "survival of the
> fittest" means that the apes would have died out and only humans
> remain? Personally I don't believe in the theory of evolution.
> However, I'm not religious in any way or form either. Put that in
> your pipe and smoke it!
So you're not an evolutionist. Good, because you realise we don't come from sea slime and monkeys. How do you believe the earth was formed/Created?
P.S. I don't smoke!
Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> We're not made from dust.
> We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single
> piece of everything in the entire universe.
>
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
If you must know, all atoms on earth were created in the nuclear reactions inside stars. Thus, if anything, we are all made of stardust.
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> We're not made from dust.
> We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single
> piece of everything in the entire universe.
>
> Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies
> are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
If you must know, all atoms on earth were created in the nuclear reactions inside stars. Thus, if anything, we are all made of stardust.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> We're not made from dust.
> We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single
> piece of everything in the entire universe.
Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
> We're not made from dust.
> We're made from atoms, which happen to make up every other single
> piece of everything in the entire universe.
Our particles are exactly the same as that of dust, thus our bodies are made just like dust. Made from the same particles.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Because scientists use to believe this was a load of rubbish, hence
> evolution is comprimising as its theories are disproved. I have
> disproved other aspects of it, but you have just ignored the point
> and pretended you didn't understand.
Why is evolution compromised by this? The theory of evolution has nothing based on atomic structures. This is akin to your last try with thermodynamics.
You obviously do not understand how theories are formed and proved/disproved.
> Because scientists use to believe this was a load of rubbish, hence
> evolution is comprimising as its theories are disproved. I have
> disproved other aspects of it, but you have just ignored the point
> and pretended you didn't understand.
Why is evolution compromised by this? The theory of evolution has nothing based on atomic structures. This is akin to your last try with thermodynamics.
You obviously do not understand how theories are formed and proved/disproved.
Lindgren wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
> the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet
> effective
> fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe
> was CREATED.
>
> And by the way, they didnt find we were made from dust, just that we
> contain some of the same particles contained in dust, as is the case
> with many many things on Earth and beyond. Theres a big difference
> there that you are missing.
In 1982 NASA discoverd humans had EXACTLY the same particles as dust.
We do not have the same particles as slime though. This is the disproof and down fall of evolution.
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
> In 1982, scientists found we were made from dust (a Biblical fact
> scentists scoffed at for hundreds of years), there is evidence from
> the flood, we all have a common ancestor and the simple yet
> effective
> fact to remember, every CREATION has a CREATOR, hence the universe
> was CREATED.
>
> And by the way, they didnt find we were made from dust, just that we
> contain some of the same particles contained in dust, as is the case
> with many many things on Earth and beyond. Theres a big difference
> there that you are missing.
In 1982 NASA discoverd humans had EXACTLY the same particles as dust.
We do not have the same particles as slime though. This is the disproof and down fall of evolution.
Page: