The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3568349.stm[/URL]
UN Resolution on the killing of the old guy in a wheel chair by Israeli missle attack.
Apparently they called the argument one sided, yeah uh-huh.
UN Resolution on the killing of the old guy in a wheel chair by Israeli missle attack.
Apparently they called the argument one sided, yeah uh-huh.
Page:
Forest Fan wrote:
> Why don't we all just stop speculating?
Funny how you never want to continue a conversation when it's a one that points out what a complete and total bigot you are...almost as if you know, deep down, that you're using hatred and fear to spread your supposedly holy message and that, as christians are supposedly about love and compassion, you're about as unchristian as it's possible to be.
> Why don't we all just stop speculating?
Funny how you never want to continue a conversation when it's a one that points out what a complete and total bigot you are...almost as if you know, deep down, that you're using hatred and fear to spread your supposedly holy message and that, as christians are supposedly about love and compassion, you're about as unchristian as it's possible to be.
unknown kernel wrote:
> Well, given that Forest Fan was worried about them collaborating with
> the devil, I don't think political reality was his prime concern.
Forest Fan's logic is strange. In his other Being A Christian topic he says the Anti-Christ is coming because of all this terrorism stuff etc, and here he is apparently saying it's coming from the election of two leaders. His consistency is slipping.
> Well, given that Forest Fan was worried about them collaborating with
> the devil, I don't think political reality was his prime concern.
Forest Fan's logic is strange. In his other Being A Christian topic he says the Anti-Christ is coming because of all this terrorism stuff etc, and here he is apparently saying it's coming from the election of two leaders. His consistency is slipping.
Why don't we all just stop speculating?
Light wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> Well that makes that clearer. How come he hasn't been warned? Wait I
> know the answer to that already...
>
> Oh I dunno. He, like you, thinks he's better than everyone else. And
> he, like you, thinks that he should be allowed to say and do things
> to others on condition that they don't do the same to him.
No, the moderators, must have realised I am Jewish, it was not a racially aggrevated term and decided it did not sanction a warning. Now let's just stick to that.
> Belldandy wrote:
> Well that makes that clearer. How come he hasn't been warned? Wait I
> know the answer to that already...
>
> Oh I dunno. He, like you, thinks he's better than everyone else. And
> he, like you, thinks that he should be allowed to say and do things
> to others on condition that they don't do the same to him.
No, the moderators, must have realised I am Jewish, it was not a racially aggrevated term and decided it did not sanction a warning. Now let's just stick to that.
Light wrote:
> THAT is what is being criticised. Okay? D'you see that Bell? Or, and
> stop me if you've heard this before, are you going to avoid even
> acknowledging you've made an error? Seriously; I'd be chuffed if, for
> once, you proved me wrong.
How am I supposed to know when the post has been removed and the person who posted it wasn't even warned eh? not having psychic powers it's rather flipping difficult. But you're the one wading in.
> THAT is what is being criticised. Okay? D'you see that Bell? Or, and
> stop me if you've heard this before, are you going to avoid even
> acknowledging you've made an error? Seriously; I'd be chuffed if, for
> once, you proved me wrong.
How am I supposed to know when the post has been removed and the person who posted it wasn't even warned eh? not having psychic powers it's rather flipping difficult. But you're the one wading in.
I never saw it either Light. So why the attitude towards Bell? I was only judging on the replies that I had seen.
Belldandy wrote:
> I'm confused as to why he'd be worried, I mean it's not like a
> Conservative would get on well with a Democrat is it? having said
> that look at Blair and Bush.
Well, given that Forest Fan was worried about them collaborating with the devil, I don't think political reality was his prime concern.
> I'm confused as to why he'd be worried, I mean it's not like a
> Conservative would get on well with a Democrat is it? having said
> that look at Blair and Bush.
Well, given that Forest Fan was worried about them collaborating with the devil, I don't think political reality was his prime concern.
Belldandy wrote:
> Well that makes that clearer. How come he hasn't been warned? Wait I
> know the answer to that already...
Oh I dunno. He, like you, thinks he's better than everyone else. And he, like you, thinks that he should be allowed to say and do things to others on condition that they don't do the same to him.
> Well that makes that clearer. How come he hasn't been warned? Wait I
> know the answer to that already...
Oh I dunno. He, like you, thinks he's better than everyone else. And he, like you, thinks that he should be allowed to say and do things to others on condition that they don't do the same to him.
SHEEPY wrote:
> Oh right, it's been changed.
Has it?
> Oh right, it's been changed.
Has it?
SHEEPY wrote:
> He never meant it to be anti-seministic because at first I had no idea
> what you were going on about.
Thankyou SHEEPY, he's got it right. I am Jewish anyway, love the people, so why would I be Anti-Semitic?
> He never meant it to be anti-seministic because at first I had no idea
> what you were going on about.
Thankyou SHEEPY, he's got it right. I am Jewish anyway, love the people, so why would I be Anti-Semitic?
Page: