The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Suprised no one else posted this, but according to a report, Chicken Tikka's that are bright red contain too much of a colouring which can cause:
Hyperactivity
Asmatha (Sp?)
Kidney Damage
and
Cancer.
Sounds to me like the report on Farmed Scotish Salmon where they said that was Cancer causing, but then they realised their mistakes and dismissed the claims, but does this report put you off your curry?
Hope to hear from you.
Hyperactivity
Asmatha (Sp?)
Kidney Damage
and
Cancer.
Sounds to me like the report on Farmed Scotish Salmon where they said that was Cancer causing, but then they realised their mistakes and dismissed the claims, but does this report put you off your curry?
Hope to hear from you.
Page:
Rosalind wrote:
> ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> >some overpaid medical clown
>
> I seriously doubt that. Take a guess at what I earn.
£14,000 a year before tax? It's ludicrous that (vital) scientific research is so poorly funded, yet we spend billions on finding "better" ways of killing each other.
> And don't forget that we are also the ones that have upped the
> survival rate of people suffering cancer in the last dacade
> substantially.
I agree.
> ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> >some overpaid medical clown
>
> I seriously doubt that. Take a guess at what I earn.
£14,000 a year before tax? It's ludicrous that (vital) scientific research is so poorly funded, yet we spend billions on finding "better" ways of killing each other.
> And don't forget that we are also the ones that have upped the
> survival rate of people suffering cancer in the last dacade
> substantially.
I agree.
Timmargh wrote:
> I don't like Chicken Tikka, I prefer a Chicken Tarka - it's like a
> Tikka but it's a little 'otter.
He he he he.
I prefer a good Chicken Baltic. It's like a Balti but it's not for Russian.
> I don't like Chicken Tikka, I prefer a Chicken Tarka - it's like a
> Tikka but it's a little 'otter.
He he he he.
I prefer a good Chicken Baltic. It's like a Balti but it's not for Russian.
well that's just it - we should concentrate on avoiding things we know to be effective cancer inducers, such as smoking, and also treating those who already have cancer. Telling people you can get cancer from water, and even chicken tikka, is just scaremongering, and completely unconstructive.
It's getting to the stage where people are paranoid to eat anything at all. Even foods that are essentially 'pure', such as fruit and veg, are surrounded by controversy of accelerated growing techniques and additives. People are paying over the odds for 'organic' foods.
The world is drowning and rather than trying to switch the water off, people are happier to describe the water ...
It's getting to the stage where people are paranoid to eat anything at all. Even foods that are essentially 'pure', such as fruit and veg, are surrounded by controversy of accelerated growing techniques and additives. People are paying over the odds for 'organic' foods.
The world is drowning and rather than trying to switch the water off, people are happier to describe the water ...
I don't think you want your food to contain things that are massively Carcinogenic. For example Acrylamide. Acrylamide was found in a few foods and is quite Carcinogenic and therefore needed removing.
The way I see it though as long as these people are doing their jobs testing our food, then the culprits will be found and removed. And there is no point in worrying about things we have eaten already.
The way I see it though as long as these people are doing their jobs testing our food, then the culprits will be found and removed. And there is no point in worrying about things we have eaten already.
Rosalind wrote:
> You said we were overpaid!
>
> *fumes*
Ok maybe I used the wrong word there. What I'm getting at is I don't consider people testing foods to see if there is the slightest chance of it causing cancer, an effective use of resources. Like I said, someone even said water can cause cancer. It's pointless information - what are we to do, lock ourselves in an airtight room and breathe only filtered air?
> You said we were overpaid!
>
> *fumes*
Ok maybe I used the wrong word there. What I'm getting at is I don't consider people testing foods to see if there is the slightest chance of it causing cancer, an effective use of resources. Like I said, someone even said water can cause cancer. It's pointless information - what are we to do, lock ourselves in an airtight room and breathe only filtered air?
You said we were overpaid!
*fumes*
*fumes*
Do you not think that if we heeded every new medical finding regarding what we should or should not be consuming then our diet would be v bland.I say celebrate food be it bright red or green!
Rosalind wrote:
> What does an increase in Cancer rates have to do with Medical
> research? Or are you trying to blame us for that?
eh? I wasn't trying to blame you for anything. I was making an enquiry as to whether cancer is becoming more or less common throughout the world. That's all.
> What does an increase in Cancer rates have to do with Medical
> research? Or are you trying to blame us for that?
eh? I wasn't trying to blame you for anything. I was making an enquiry as to whether cancer is becoming more or less common throughout the world. That's all.
What does an increase in Cancer rates have to do with Medical research? Or are you trying to blame us for that?
I don't like Chicken Tikka, I prefer a Chicken Tarka - it's like a Tikka but it's a little 'otter.
Page: