The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
which country do you hate the most and why?
Page:
Hate can be healthy
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
>
> hating is just a waste of valuable energy, that could be used for
> other things, such as lifting a cup of tea to your mouth or
> scratching your ass.
Empty, directionless hate is. But it's like love; you can harness it and it gives you energy.
>
> hating is just a waste of valuable energy, that could be used for
> other things, such as lifting a cup of tea to your mouth or
> scratching your ass.
Empty, directionless hate is. But it's like love; you can harness it and it gives you energy.
Light wrote:
> 2. The Who Do You Hate Most...well, I'm a great believer in venting
> rather than bottling things up. It gives a chance to do that.
> Besides, to get all metaphysical for a moment, you can't really be
> capable of love unless you know how to hate.
hating is just a waste of valuable energy, that could be used for other things, such as lifting a cup of tea to your mouth or scratching your ass.
> 2. The Who Do You Hate Most...well, I'm a great believer in venting
> rather than bottling things up. It gives a chance to do that.
> Besides, to get all metaphysical for a moment, you can't really be
> capable of love unless you know how to hate.
hating is just a waste of valuable energy, that could be used for other things, such as lifting a cup of tea to your mouth or scratching your ass.
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> And this makes it okay? The best you can do is "well they're
> doing it as well"? They have to do it because it is the
> continued policy of this labour government in how it chooses to use
> funds.
Yes thats right. Poor Tory Councils. Its not their fault, its that big nasty old Labour's fault. It really is wrong of them to invest in public services, with more nurses, doctors and police than in 1997.
> And how many towns have beaches? Do I care? Does the majority of the
> nation? I doubt it, round here they can't even keep the park
> clean...Air? We have the cleaner air due to less industy, various
> acts of parliament and international treaties...very little to do
> with Council tax.
Its air and drinking water as well.
> Wow, 1000 eh? You forget to mention the other changes, which would
> get more existing police officers onto the street because they'd be
> doing less paperwork or passing some duties onto other people.
Every opposition party since the dawn of time has said it would cut the red tape. But oh so few actually have done it.
> Well I don't know about that, but I'd wager that only the most ardent
> labour supporters in the country would believe that...
And only the most ardent anti-labour person would just cast it off, because they know better.
> He means he is happy with the anti-terrorist powers his force has. As
> in the Police force. Sociology eh? The problem is that I suspect
> you've not finished the course and that the "society is to
> blame" answer is but one of many...for starters it's from the
> liberal viewpoint of society.
If not society, who? I mean, since Noah was on his cruise there has been crime. Many many Governments have come and gone in that time, and yet crime remains.
> Society is a direct product of the
> government in power, in the same way that the government reflects
> society - kind of a circular thing.
So is it both societies fault and the Government?
> You're doing what course again????
>
> If you have no government then a different kind of society is
> created, a non-western one for starters, without laws or controls it
> becomes little more than the rule of the strong minority of the
> weaker majority.
You were blaming central Government for crime. I was stating that in countries with no Government, there is still crime. Ergo, the Government isn't the main cause of crime.
> And this makes it okay? The best you can do is "well they're
> doing it as well"? They have to do it because it is the
> continued policy of this labour government in how it chooses to use
> funds.
Yes thats right. Poor Tory Councils. Its not their fault, its that big nasty old Labour's fault. It really is wrong of them to invest in public services, with more nurses, doctors and police than in 1997.
> And how many towns have beaches? Do I care? Does the majority of the
> nation? I doubt it, round here they can't even keep the park
> clean...Air? We have the cleaner air due to less industy, various
> acts of parliament and international treaties...very little to do
> with Council tax.
Its air and drinking water as well.
> Wow, 1000 eh? You forget to mention the other changes, which would
> get more existing police officers onto the street because they'd be
> doing less paperwork or passing some duties onto other people.
Every opposition party since the dawn of time has said it would cut the red tape. But oh so few actually have done it.
> Well I don't know about that, but I'd wager that only the most ardent
> labour supporters in the country would believe that...
And only the most ardent anti-labour person would just cast it off, because they know better.
> He means he is happy with the anti-terrorist powers his force has. As
> in the Police force. Sociology eh? The problem is that I suspect
> you've not finished the course and that the "society is to
> blame" answer is but one of many...for starters it's from the
> liberal viewpoint of society.
If not society, who? I mean, since Noah was on his cruise there has been crime. Many many Governments have come and gone in that time, and yet crime remains.
> Society is a direct product of the
> government in power, in the same way that the government reflects
> society - kind of a circular thing.
So is it both societies fault and the Government?
> You're doing what course again????
>
> If you have no government then a different kind of society is
> created, a non-western one for starters, without laws or controls it
> becomes little more than the rule of the strong minority of the
> weaker majority.
You were blaming central Government for crime. I was stating that in countries with no Government, there is still crime. Ergo, the Government isn't the main cause of crime.
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Sorry but they do, except Mr Blair doesn't want to see that link to
> his government in a forthcoming election period.
>
> Council tax was setup under a government, hence it can be removed by
> government as the poll tax was. Council tax is the main way local
> councils generate revenue for services - because central government
> doesn't want to spend more than it has to on them.
I'm not saying they can't remove it, i'm just saying that councils put council tax up. All the Government does is give them money. That amount has been upped as of late.
> You'll also find central government has the power to cap tax rises,
> but doesn't, despite the promise it would do so where councils had
> excessive rises.
But isn't the average tax ries now about 6. something %? Thats about the going rate.
> Sorry but they do, except Mr Blair doesn't want to see that link to
> his government in a forthcoming election period.
>
> Council tax was setup under a government, hence it can be removed by
> government as the poll tax was. Council tax is the main way local
> councils generate revenue for services - because central government
> doesn't want to spend more than it has to on them.
I'm not saying they can't remove it, i'm just saying that councils put council tax up. All the Government does is give them money. That amount has been upped as of late.
> You'll also find central government has the power to cap tax rises,
> but doesn't, despite the promise it would do so where councils had
> excessive rises.
But isn't the average tax ries now about 6. something %? Thats about the going rate.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> These twin topics 'Who do you hate most' and 'Which country do you
> hate most' are the worst ideas these forums have ever seen.
Well...I'd agree with you except for two things;
1. This thread helps identify people with no sense of irony, and racist smears of cocklard.
2. The Who Do You Hate Most...well, I'm a great believer in venting rather than bottling things up. It gives a chance to do that. Besides, to get all metaphysical for a moment, you can't really be capable of love unless you know how to hate.
> These twin topics 'Who do you hate most' and 'Which country do you
> hate most' are the worst ideas these forums have ever seen.
Well...I'd agree with you except for two things;
1. This thread helps identify people with no sense of irony, and racist smears of cocklard.
2. The Who Do You Hate Most...well, I'm a great believer in venting rather than bottling things up. It gives a chance to do that. Besides, to get all metaphysical for a moment, you can't really be capable of love unless you know how to hate.
Why not wales any one?
Weather is more important than politics however
I like it warm
I like it warm
Britain
America
America
Edgy wrote:
> You're a supporter of ethnic cleansing then?
Naturally. But only when I'm not supporting paedophilia and baby seal clubbing.
Amazingly, the one time I was in Switzerland was on the eve of a referendum about chucking all dirty foreigners out of the country. Evil immigrants and their supporters held a street party opposing it and it was the only place you could get a drink in all of Geneva. The Swiss mentality: throw out anyone who wants to have fun.
> You're a supporter of ethnic cleansing then?
Naturally. But only when I'm not supporting paedophilia and baby seal clubbing.
Amazingly, the one time I was in Switzerland was on the eve of a referendum about chucking all dirty foreigners out of the country. Evil immigrants and their supporters held a street party opposing it and it was the only place you could get a drink in all of Geneva. The Swiss mentality: throw out anyone who wants to have fun.
Page: