The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Vote now
Just the name please...
Lampard
Just the name please...
Lampard
Page:
At the minute there is only one difference between Chelsea and Arsenal. Chelsea can match them and have shown that, but the one difference is, they have Henry and we don't. We need a predator up front, who will score and create. And when we find our "Henry," then we will be able to beat the gooners.
Chelsea will over reach themselves, they will end up with a team full of either young English players or dodgy older foreigners, they won't get as a unit like the French players at Arsenal do; Theirry Henry, Robert Pires and Patrick Vieira.
Virtuoso wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
>
> I don't know. But he must have been good as Chelsea paid about 8
> million for him.
> -------------
>
> yes, but Chelsea pay about £20Mil each for bench-warmers =P
No they don't.
> Wakka wrote:
>
> I don't know. But he must have been good as Chelsea paid about 8
> million for him.
> -------------
>
> yes, but Chelsea pay about £20Mil each for bench-warmers =P
No they don't.
Wakka wrote:
I don't know. But he must have been good as Chelsea paid about 8 million for him.
-------------
yes, but Chelsea pay about £20Mil each for bench-warmers =P
I don't know. But he must have been good as Chelsea paid about 8 million for him.
-------------
yes, but Chelsea pay about £20Mil each for bench-warmers =P
Your face
Your opinion stinks of Chelsea anal.
Lampard was brilliant last night. Kept Vieira quiet pretty much all evening.
Tch I'm a real football fan and my opinion is of high value I'll have you know.
Steven Gerrard is Liverpool.
But let's just look where they are in the league.
Tch I'm a real football fan and my opinion is of high value I'll have you know.
Steven Gerrard is Liverpool.
But let's just look where they are in the league.
Colourless wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> he was crap at West Ham. Plus England have never lost with
> Steven Gerrard in the side.
>
> Did you see him play???
Yes
> And how many games did he get at West Ham?
I don't know. But he must have been good as Chelsea paid about 8 million for him.
> Wakka wrote:
> he was crap at West Ham. Plus England have never lost with
> Steven Gerrard in the side.
>
> Did you see him play???
Yes
> And how many games did he get at West Ham?
I don't know. But he must have been good as Chelsea paid about 8 million for him.
Well, Steven Gerrard's got to be the No.1 choice for England right now, purely because he's playing in the right role for his club, whereas, Frank Lampard as 'defensively-suited' as he may need to be, right now.
Lampard tends to get a lot more envolved in what goes on with Chelsea's attack. It's not so much of the tracking-back to defend in his game, so it seems. Not with Claude Makelele and Scott Parker, anyway.
And, I know you could say the same thing about Gerrard, but, he is playing for Liverpool, y'know. I mean... With Owen still a shade of his France '98-self, their donkey-and-muppet-led attack needs all the help it can get.
Steven Gerrard, quite simply, is carrying Liverpool, single-handedly. He does it all. The "[]Ione-man team[/I]" (at times) if you will.
Lampard tends to get a lot more envolved in what goes on with Chelsea's attack. It's not so much of the tracking-back to defend in his game, so it seems. Not with Claude Makelele and Scott Parker, anyway.
And, I know you could say the same thing about Gerrard, but, he is playing for Liverpool, y'know. I mean... With Owen still a shade of his France '98-self, their donkey-and-muppet-led attack needs all the help it can get.
Steven Gerrard, quite simply, is carrying Liverpool, single-handedly. He does it all. The "[]Ione-man team[/I]" (at times) if you will.
If it's against Barthez it doesn't really count :^D
Page: