The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,2-524-1037688,00.html[/URL]
It'll be interesting to see this. It'll also be good to see how Moore copes with it.
It'll be interesting to see this. It'll also be good to see how Moore copes with it.
Page:
Belldandy wrote:
When I said "you" it was
> referring to what Moore had done...I thought that was obvious.
-------
Ah, I misunderstood your post.
The fact remains though, I care not for his background nor have I ever defended anything except the content of his books and documentaries.
It seems pretty desperate to try and smear somebody using family because you do not approve of his books.
If he wasn't a threat, why go to such lengths to discredit the man?
When I said "you" it was
> referring to what Moore had done...I thought that was obvious.
-------
Ah, I misunderstood your post.
The fact remains though, I care not for his background nor have I ever defended anything except the content of his books and documentaries.
It seems pretty desperate to try and smear somebody using family because you do not approve of his books.
If he wasn't a threat, why go to such lengths to discredit the man?
Ah, the other tactic "Enron Enron Enron Enron, nothing matters because Enron Enron Enron Enron la la la la Enron"
Yup.
Yup.
Belldandy wrote:
>
> When the information is largely false or subverted? That's
> communism...
No that's ENRON, I wonder where some of those people work now...
>
> When the information is largely false or subverted? That's
> communism...
No that's ENRON, I wonder where some of those people work now...
SHEEPY wrote:
> Bellandy, it was an attempt of a joke. Of course I knew what you
> bloody meant.
Save your time it's not worth it.
> Bellandy, it was an attempt of a joke. Of course I knew what you
> bloody meant.
Save your time it's not worth it.
Goatboy wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> When the information is largely false or subverted? That's
> communism...
>
> We had a lengthy thread where you admitted to never having read Moore
> and being unfamiliar with the material. So your comments are void.
>
>
> As well as making it look like you come from a working class
> background to give the impression you know what it is is like for
> working class people...like Moore has apparently done...
> ????????????????????
> So you are sneering at being working class now?
>
> Even for your ignorance Bell, that is shockingly stupid.
> What's wrong with being working class?
No, the point is that Moore has made a point of saying how his parents wer working class etc to support his arguments, when by the information in Light's link, and elsewhere, that is blatant fantasy. It's all part of Moore's act. When I said "you" it was referring to what Moore had done...I thought that was obvious.
> Belldandy wrote:
> When the information is largely false or subverted? That's
> communism...
>
> We had a lengthy thread where you admitted to never having read Moore
> and being unfamiliar with the material. So your comments are void.
>
>
> As well as making it look like you come from a working class
> background to give the impression you know what it is is like for
> working class people...like Moore has apparently done...
> ????????????????????
> So you are sneering at being working class now?
>
> Even for your ignorance Bell, that is shockingly stupid.
> What's wrong with being working class?
No, the point is that Moore has made a point of saying how his parents wer working class etc to support his arguments, when by the information in Light's link, and elsewhere, that is blatant fantasy. It's all part of Moore's act. When I said "you" it was referring to what Moore had done...I thought that was obvious.
Belldandy wrote:
> When the information is largely false or subverted? That's
> communism...
We had a lengthy thread where you admitted to never having read Moore and being unfamiliar with the material. So your comments are void.
> As well as making it look like you come from a working class
> background to give the impression you know what it is is like for
> working class people...like Moore has apparently done...
????????????????????
So you are sneering at being working class now?
Even for your ignorance Bell, that is shockingly stupid.
What's wrong with being working class?
> When the information is largely false or subverted? That's
> communism...
We had a lengthy thread where you admitted to never having read Moore and being unfamiliar with the material. So your comments are void.
> As well as making it look like you come from a working class
> background to give the impression you know what it is is like for
> working class people...like Moore has apparently done...
????????????????????
So you are sneering at being working class now?
Even for your ignorance Bell, that is shockingly stupid.
What's wrong with being working class?
Goatboy wrote:
> That's a distinctly communist attitude Bell to suggest that somebody
> is evil for making a living out of the promotion and distribution of
> information.
When the information is largely false or subverted? That's communism...
As well as making it look like you come from a working class background to give the impression you know what it is is like for working class people...like Moore has apparently done...
In fact I'd say his denouncement of big business and profits, whilst doing both himself, is a pretty good mirror image of the Communist leadership in the FSU.
> That's a distinctly communist attitude Bell to suggest that somebody
> is evil for making a living out of the promotion and distribution of
> information.
When the information is largely false or subverted? That's communism...
As well as making it look like you come from a working class background to give the impression you know what it is is like for working class people...like Moore has apparently done...
In fact I'd say his denouncement of big business and profits, whilst doing both himself, is a pretty good mirror image of the Communist leadership in the FSU.
Belldandy wrote:
> I'll tell you what he's in it for...
>
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
------
That's a distinctly communist attitude Bell to suggest that somebody is evil for making a living out of the promotion and distribution of information.
Not that you'd be familiar with Moore's works, we've already established that.
> I'll tell you what he's in it for...
>
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
------
That's a distinctly communist attitude Bell to suggest that somebody is evil for making a living out of the promotion and distribution of information.
Not that you'd be familiar with Moore's works, we've already established that.
Belldandy wrote:
> Ah, not so, because it's Time magazine, who are generally less than
> happy with Bush and the current Administration at the best of times.
--------
So biased journalism is ok when it fits in with a view you subscribe to?
Ok, just checking your principles.
> Ah, not so, because it's Time magazine, who are generally less than
> happy with Bush and the current Administration at the best of times.
--------
So biased journalism is ok when it fits in with a view you subscribe to?
Ok, just checking your principles.
Belldandy wrote:
> Keyword "attempt", I thought it just made you look like a
> retard.
------
Yet you completely failing to notice Sheepy's joke makes you come off as Mensa-Boy, riiight?
> Keyword "attempt", I thought it just made you look like a
> retard.
------
Yet you completely failing to notice Sheepy's joke makes you come off as Mensa-Boy, riiight?
Page: