The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
62 dead is the figure at the moment. I hate hearing about things like this, wherever they are. Nothing can justify ripping through peoples' lives in a supposedly safe environment.
Page:
Ah well. Hopefully they find out who did it. B*stards.
It is odd, but thats what being said at the moment. They may well find there were more.
Lindgren wrote:
> Apparently it was four bombs on 3 trains, and an unexploded one was
> found today at Atocha I think, so that would have made it 5. Two of
> the bombs that detonated were on the train at Atocha.
Christ. It just seemed weird, because in the pictures they show, there's 2 holes in one train, 4 in another. Doesn't make sense unless I've missed something.
> Apparently it was four bombs on 3 trains, and an unexploded one was
> found today at Atocha I think, so that would have made it 5. Two of
> the bombs that detonated were on the train at Atocha.
Christ. It just seemed weird, because in the pictures they show, there's 2 holes in one train, 4 in another. Doesn't make sense unless I've missed something.
Apparently it was four bombs on 3 trains, and an unexploded one was found today at Atocha I think, so that would have made it 5. Two of the bombs that detonated were on the train at Atocha.
Watching them all come together earlier on was quite moving. Nope.. very moving, it must've been the first time something has actually brought me to tears in the news. Shoves a chill right up your spine, indeed.
I don't seem to think it was the ETA. I thought, might be wrong, that they used to say when there was going to be an attack. Like, ring up before it would happen then ring up immediately afterwards and they would also admit to doing something even though they've denied it. Also I thought they used aluminium in their bomb thingys yet this time it was copper or something.
Also, anyone care to shed some info? I thought there was 4 bombs that went off in three different places. What actually happened? Because Sky News said one story yesterday and it was completely different today.
I don't seem to think it was the ETA. I thought, might be wrong, that they used to say when there was going to be an attack. Like, ring up before it would happen then ring up immediately afterwards and they would also admit to doing something even though they've denied it. Also I thought they used aluminium in their bomb thingys yet this time it was copper or something.
Also, anyone care to shed some info? I thought there was 4 bombs that went off in three different places. What actually happened? Because Sky News said one story yesterday and it was completely different today.
HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> Woah... send this topic to Intelligent Chat, please. :P
And get Forest Fan involved? Peleeez....
> Woah... send this topic to Intelligent Chat, please. :P
And get Forest Fan involved? Peleeez....
I hate terrorism. Not that it just kills innocent people; it almost once killed me. I walked over Hammersmith Bridge 20 minutes before the IRA attempted to blow it up.
Woah... send this topic to Intelligent Chat, please. :P
This discussion is getting far too serious for general chat.
*Dribbles onto bib*
*Dribbles onto bib*
unknown kernel wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> The coalition did not sweep up the entire Afghan population into
> Guantanamo so clearly those there did something
>
> How you can say this is beyond me. Neither you nor anyone else have
> any idea what evidence the US has, what confessions the
> prisoners have given or what crimes they are being presumed guilty
> of. Presumably if you are so certain of their guilt then you would
> support giving them a fair trial like anyone else?
Look what I typed. I said "they clearly did something".
Did I say they were guilty? Did I say it was right? No, just that to be where they are they must have done something to arouse suspicion. Actually holding them this long without charge or trial is hardly bolstering Bush or Blair's popularity, and releasing them all would be an easy way to silence a lot of criticism, which brings it back to why they are not all released?
> Belldandy wrote:
> The coalition did not sweep up the entire Afghan population into
> Guantanamo so clearly those there did something
>
> How you can say this is beyond me. Neither you nor anyone else have
> any idea what evidence the US has, what confessions the
> prisoners have given or what crimes they are being presumed guilty
> of. Presumably if you are so certain of their guilt then you would
> support giving them a fair trial like anyone else?
Look what I typed. I said "they clearly did something".
Did I say they were guilty? Did I say it was right? No, just that to be where they are they must have done something to arouse suspicion. Actually holding them this long without charge or trial is hardly bolstering Bush or Blair's popularity, and releasing them all would be an easy way to silence a lot of criticism, which brings it back to why they are not all released?
Page: