The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
After all the publicity , and after whining over the fact the the best Metal Gear Solid is going to be Gamecube exclusive , The Twin Snakes turned out to be a failure!! All American/Japanese/European reviewers state that the game is not what they were expecting it to be , it doesn't really give you a storyline as good as Metal Gear Solid or a gameplay as good as Sons Of Liberty , and even the graphics turned out not to be what they were expecting !!
Page:
Second of all why do you have to be so racist about canadians?!
Don't you know Silicon Knights ARE a very good development company?!
Don't you know Silicon Knights ARE a very good development company?!
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Its the same game you fa**y.
I'm guessing the word is fairy?
> Its the same game you fa**y.
I'm guessing the word is fairy?
What the hell is wrong with 8.75 out of 10 in dorimanga or whatever that mag is?!
First of All , both Metal Gear Solid and Metal Gear Solid 2 : Sons Of Liberty were rated 10/10 in opsm , and opsm2 , Metal Gear Solid was rated 100% by almost every major game reviewer , and The ratings of Sons Of Liberty varied between 9.6 - 9.9 , Secondly here are some of the comments about this game :
These are some the translated comments about the game from Japanese sites :
"MGS:TS did not evolve to the required level as the habit of a popular video game , and that is a fact "
"MGS:TS is new but not original , the geographics was long as it was a failure and the element of excitement does not exist in the game "
"Broken Polygons , groovy edges with no reason "
"It should have been designed and directed by Kojima , since when do Canadians know about designing video games ? "
"Reviews of Japanese video games magazines are disappointing: Famitsu , Dorimaga , IG , Famitsu Cube , the level of the game and the outcome did not reach get passed "Very Good" , and never reached "Excellent""
"Reviews of American and British magazines for the same game were not good : Edge , Game Informer did not give the game an excellent rating as it was 85% "
"All reviews refered to the presence of a lot of bugs and mistakes in the game , the game did not really take the advantages of the engine or the storyline , the translation was bad , and Denis Dake , the Canadian designer of the game was not up to the popularity of the series "
These are some the translated comments about the game from Japanese sites :
"MGS:TS did not evolve to the required level as the habit of a popular video game , and that is a fact "
"MGS:TS is new but not original , the geographics was long as it was a failure and the element of excitement does not exist in the game "
"Broken Polygons , groovy edges with no reason "
"It should have been designed and directed by Kojima , since when do Canadians know about designing video games ? "
"Reviews of Japanese video games magazines are disappointing: Famitsu , Dorimaga , IG , Famitsu Cube , the level of the game and the outcome did not reach get passed "Very Good" , and never reached "Excellent""
"Reviews of American and British magazines for the same game were not good : Edge , Game Informer did not give the game an excellent rating as it was 85% "
"All reviews refered to the presence of a lot of bugs and mistakes in the game , the game did not really take the advantages of the engine or the storyline , the translation was bad , and Denis Dake , the Canadian designer of the game was not up to the popularity of the series "
90% in NGC = good enough for me.
It's a remake of one of only 3 games I loved on the PSone, with GC graphics, effects, sounds and touches, and the same excellent gameplay and story.
And Silicon Knights, Mr. Homosh, have more talent in their right cornea's smallest little bit than you do if you weighed 25 stone and were cloned several times.
It's a remake of one of only 3 games I loved on the PSone, with GC graphics, effects, sounds and touches, and the same excellent gameplay and story.
And Silicon Knights, Mr. Homosh, have more talent in their right cornea's smallest little bit than you do if you weighed 25 stone and were cloned several times.
Just a comment from the only intenet based review I can find although I do actually have the publications from GamePro and Electronic Gaming monthly if you are interested. Here is what Computer and Video Games: America had to say...
"Metal Gear still manages to be a killer game. The best Metal Gear game ever. The PlayStation 2 game, Sons of Liberty, introduced a first-person aiming mode, tranquilliser darts and a whole host of other cool stuff. But it didn't have the story and, crucially, you didn't play as Solid Snake for most of it. This brand-new version takes the gripping plot of Metal Gear Solid and splices it with the new gameplay systems from the sequel. You really are getting the best of both worlds here."
Their final comment:
"This is a classic. 'Classic' in that it's slightly dated and 'classic' in that it still stands up as amazing fun. Full credit to Silicon Knights: they made the absolute best of having to do an exact copy of a game that's five years old."
I have the published comments infront of me if you care for me to post more. Although having to eat your own words may not be a faviurite past time.
"Metal Gear still manages to be a killer game. The best Metal Gear game ever. The PlayStation 2 game, Sons of Liberty, introduced a first-person aiming mode, tranquilliser darts and a whole host of other cool stuff. But it didn't have the story and, crucially, you didn't play as Solid Snake for most of it. This brand-new version takes the gripping plot of Metal Gear Solid and splices it with the new gameplay systems from the sequel. You really are getting the best of both worlds here."
Their final comment:
"This is a classic. 'Classic' in that it's slightly dated and 'classic' in that it still stands up as amazing fun. Full credit to Silicon Knights: they made the absolute best of having to do an exact copy of a game that's five years old."
I have the published comments infront of me if you care for me to post more. Although having to eat your own words may not be a faviurite past time.
I agree
Hmmm wind deflector my ass...
Lately, there have been a few posters who are posting obvious crap; like the one with the PSX being PS3. It still beats over spamming though, and it's more fun arguing with people disagreeing with clearcut facts than just reading "lol" a trillion times
Lately, there have been a few posters who are posting obvious crap; like the one with the PSX being PS3. It still beats over spamming though, and it's more fun arguing with people disagreeing with clearcut facts than just reading "lol" a trillion times
I have done everything bar play it but seeing as though the level design is exactly the same as the original in terms of layout it smacks of pure retardedness that you are going against a game you were praising earier on.
I have made a DVD with 45 minutes of playable footage as well as the 30 minute trailer and believe me when I say you really are talking crap.
So unless you thought the original had crap level design and all the other stupid comments you are coming out with then I think we can safely say whoever is feeding you this information needs a wind deflector across their ass hole.
I have made a DVD with 45 minutes of playable footage as well as the 30 minute trailer and believe me when I say you really are talking crap.
So unless you thought the original had crap level design and all the other stupid comments you are coming out with then I think we can safely say whoever is feeding you this information needs a wind deflector across their ass hole.
Besides , people who played the Demo say that the only thing that was visually improved was Solid Snake , and the level Design was Crap
Page: