The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Discuss.
(He also said Lampard, but while this is also true, I actually rate Lampard.)
> AfroJoe wrote:
> henry iz well betta coz e az scord more goles!!!!111
>
> That's not even a great example..
That's because I was taking the complete and utter pish.
---Virtuoso wrote:
---Fighting for fourth place, third if Chelsea
6th I think you'll find.
--------------
Erm....
> Littlest Brother wrote:
>
> Gerrard has done nothing, if he was 'amazing' then Liverpool would
> not be in the mess they are in. Simple.
> -----------
>
> What a mess we're in! Fighting for fourth place, third if Chelsea
> play as they are, and we don't have a suger-daddy to blow
> £100Mil in 1 season. Woe betide us, we must sack our bad
> manager (Just like Chelski might be doing :P ).
1 Arsenal 27 67
2 Chelsea 27 58
3 Man Utd 27 58
4 Newcastle 26 41
5 Charlton 27 40
6 Liverpool 25 38
6th I think you'll find.
>
> "Lampard IS better by a long way."
> --
>
> Lol again.
>
> =D
^o(
> henry iz well betta coz e az scord more goles!!!!111
That's not even a great example..
Gerrard has done nothing, if he was 'amazing' then Liverpool would not be in the mess they are in. Simple.
-----------
What a mess we're in! Fighting for fourth place, third if Chelsea play as they are, and we don't have a suger-daddy to blow £100Mil in 1 season. Woe betide us, we must sack our bad manager (Just like Chelski might be doing :P ).
"Lampard IS better by a long way."
--
Lol again.
=D
1. English_Bloke, it's 'GerRard' not as you like to call him 'Gererd'!
2. I was merely saying Dalmat was better in response to Virtuoso's comment that Gerrard was the best midfielder in the world, and my wind up worked as it saw him getting in a state and moaning how he wasn't.
3. Lampard IS better by a long way. Especially this season. How many times have we seen that curling powerful snap shot that Lampard releases a few times a game?
Gerrard has done nothing, if he was 'amazing' then Liverpool would not be in the mess they are in. Simple.
> Steven Gerrard and Stéphane Dalmat, for the
> "midfielders" that they are, are both very different
> players, still.
Very differenet? No they aren't, they can both be compared for their attackive sides as Gerrard is as good as anyone going forward. The only difference is he actually puts in the work at the back as well which Dalmat doesn't. If you were comparing them going forwards then that would be completely acceptable.
> henry iz well betta coz e az scord more goles!!!!111
He also has a lot of assists. Also most of his goals are beautiful goals.
Steven Gerrard and Stéphane Dalmat, for the "midfielders" that they are, are both very different players, still.
One is a defensive-midfielder; the other is more attacking with a good deal of versitality and skill.
For the umteenth time, you CANNOT compare DIFFERENT players (unless you're still 12-years-old)! It's like the whole `van Nistelrooy vs. Henry´ thing...