Viewing Thread:
"Lobsters are not red (some can be though)"

Just saw a Simpsons episode with a red lobster and after asking several people it seems a lot of people think all lobsters are red, they even think shrimp are too (well pinky) and crabs (the only red crabs i've seen are the tiny ones that move in their millions)

Lobsters come in a variety of colors besides the usual blue-green (their shells only turn red when they are boiled), including blue, yellow, red, and white. Some even come in two colors, having half of their shell one color and the other half a totally different color.

Such pointless trivia.

ßora† SagdiyeV wrote:
> Lil Ginge wrote:
> Rant over - more cheesceake
>
> no thanks, although another bag of ready salted hula hoops would hit
> the spot.

Could I tempt you in apfel strudel???

mmmmmmmm

I would rather have another dinner, I'm not that big on deserts. Meals - a juicy steak with the works.

Yesh... is it bad or unatrractive for a girl to eat alot and eat such things? I was wondering for I love and adore my food. I never put on weight infact I have trouble keeping weight on due to dancing etc.. But I see these ladies with their crappppy diets and picky selections and rice cakes with smoked salmon?

What is that? that feminity that sworms round them like a bad odour!?

Is it bad i am different?? I do not think it bothers sam that i eat more than he does..

Lil Ginge wrote:
> Rant over - more cheesceake

no thanks, although another bag of ready salted hula hoops would hit the spot.

YOUVE BEEN A BAD BOY

GO TO MY ROOM!!!

grr back to the topic. It is just quite hilarious to see old users such as these spend their life on here and most of the time their on here all they do is beat down others, ridicule others and generally be a fool.

A sad fool with no life.

Why are they on here?? Because they cannot do these things in the 'real world' to people to their face?? Full of pumped up anger and aggression? Sexually frustrated??

I dunno I dont care - what ever it is that makes idiots on here go around like they are the 'literacy police' or the 'bad post good post judge' makes me think - Good lord if only they saw the hilarious behavious in which they continually use

Rant over - more cheesceake

Heh, I have a mental picture of Ginge holding both of them by the ear, in the style of Andy Capps wife. :)

So the post ismt brimming with politics and creative ability..

deal with it!

Really lads atleast it had some kind of personal relevance compared to some of the random bull posted on this site. Really, Can't you guys just grow up instead of whinging about how everyone else is lower than yourselves and do not post to your specification.

Either go out or something - or find something rewarding to do with your spare time because repetedly going around on a chat forum caining down others posts and intellectual ability is a little ridiculous and laughable???

You thinks???

Okay this has now become tedious, I'll be the bigger man and just walk away. Thank you for your participation in this thread gentlemen.

Thought you had better things to do? As for throwing the first stone, do you seriously believe that not being the first person to get 'the hump' justifies you jumping in and calling people retards?

Simpleton. You're as guilty as anyone for reacting, as you still are, by replying to me.

kittworld wrote:
> You know that is a stupid comparison. Especially as so many people
> have already said that they were unaware of this. Similar to the
> misconception that most frogs go "ribbet" they don't.

Really?! That kind of vital info deserves a thread of its own. Possibly two.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> kittworld wrote:
> True, however your comment having been made publicly was intended to
> cause me offense. Which you'll find is a definition of the word
> insult. You'll also find that your valuation of me can too be
> defined
> as an act of arrogance.
>
> I wasn't insulting anyone. It's not an insult really if it's faily
> accurate, and you take offence at it clearly of your own accord, not
> mine.
>
> As for arrogance, again, that comes down to whether you believe I was
> purposefully attempting to belittle you in order to demonstrate my
> superiority, or simply informing you that I have a very low opinion
> of you.
>
> Finally, a battle of 'wits', as you put it, wouldn't be much contest,
> as your utter lack of wit led me to make my original comments.

This is going to get very tedious, a comment that was uncalled for. Like I said, I didnt throw the first stone.

H²O wrote:
> Well, its a bit of a stupid thing to post, its like if i posted a
> thread saying "Snow is cold. It is formed from frozen rain
> drops" as if to say people dont know..
>
> ..
> .
> ...

You know that is a stupid comparison. Especially as so many people have already said that they were unaware of this. Similar to the misconception that most frogs go "ribbet" they don't.