The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well, it looks like he got away with it, anyway.
I don't think anybody is too surprised that a Tony Blair appointee didn't find fault with Tony Blair but, still, it's annoying.
Roll on a proper inquiry into Iraq.
I don't think anybody is too surprised that a Tony Blair appointee didn't find fault with Tony Blair but, still, it's annoying.
Roll on a proper inquiry into Iraq.
Page:
Darwock wrote:
> More excellent coverage last night, I hope you all watched it.
>
> Can I just remind pepole that it's not because the report says
> something people don't like that it's being denounced as a
> whitewash... it's because EVERYTHING it says supports the government.
> They did not make one mistake??? Yeah right.
Well, do you have any hard evidence to show otherwise???
> More excellent coverage last night, I hope you all watched it.
>
> Can I just remind pepole that it's not because the report says
> something people don't like that it's being denounced as a
> whitewash... it's because EVERYTHING it says supports the government.
> They did not make one mistake??? Yeah right.
Well, do you have any hard evidence to show otherwise???
More excellent coverage last night, I hope you all watched it.
Can I just remind pepole that it's not because the report says something people don't like that it's being denounced as a whitewash... it's because EVERYTHING it says supports the government. They did not make one mistake??? Yeah right.
Can I just remind pepole that it's not because the report says something people don't like that it's being denounced as a whitewash... it's because EVERYTHING it says supports the government. They did not make one mistake??? Yeah right.
Light wrote:
> I haven't read through all of what Flockhart has said. I try not to
> comment on something that I haven't read or don't know anything
> about. People will just think me a fool if I did.
You mean like when you were talking about Rainbow Six? Oh....
> I haven't read through all of what Flockhart has said. I try not to
> comment on something that I haven't read or don't know anything
> about. People will just think me a fool if I did.
You mean like when you were talking about Rainbow Six? Oh....
Light wrote:
> I haven't read through all of what Flockhart has said. I try not to
> comment on something that I haven't read or don't know anything
> about. People will just think me a fool if I did.
Have you read any of Michael Moore's books, Light? ;) ;) ;)
> I haven't read through all of what Flockhart has said. I try not to
> comment on something that I haven't read or don't know anything
> about. People will just think me a fool if I did.
Have you read any of Michael Moore's books, Light? ;) ;) ;)
Belldandy wrote:
> Do you agree with Flockhart then Light? Because I'd wager you don't
> because I'll bet you've at least started reading the report or at
> least saw the summary?
I haven't read through all of what Flockhart has said. I try not to comment on something that I haven't read or don't know anything about. People will just think me a fool if I did.
> Do you agree with Flockhart then Light? Because I'd wager you don't
> because I'll bet you've at least started reading the report or at
> least saw the summary?
I haven't read through all of what Flockhart has said. I try not to comment on something that I haven't read or don't know anything about. People will just think me a fool if I did.
Belldandy wrote:
> Light wrote:
> Had you read and digested the Hutton report in it's entirety before
> making a single post on this topic?
>
> I watched the entire statement by Hutton, which as it covered in
> summary the main points, was enough to begin with. I've also been
> makng my way through the report and the index of the report is pretty
> clear meaning you can easily find a subject and reports findings on
> it.
Right; you'll have to forgive me as I didn't see that, but didn't you criticise everyone else who has posted in this thread for only relying on news reports? And yet you only relined on a summary of the main points yourself, correct?
> Light wrote:
> Had you read and digested the Hutton report in it's entirety before
> making a single post on this topic?
>
> I watched the entire statement by Hutton, which as it covered in
> summary the main points, was enough to begin with. I've also been
> makng my way through the report and the index of the report is pretty
> clear meaning you can easily find a subject and reports findings on
> it.
Right; you'll have to forgive me as I didn't see that, but didn't you criticise everyone else who has posted in this thread for only relying on news reports? And yet you only relined on a summary of the main points yourself, correct?
Do you agree with Flockhart then Light? Because I'd wager you don't because I'll bet you've at least started reading the report or at least saw the summary?
Light wrote:
> Had you read and digested the Hutton report in it's entirety before
> making a single post on this topic?
I watched the entire statement by Hutton, which as it covered in summary the main points, was enough to begin with. I've also been makng my way through the report and the index of the report is pretty clear meaning you can easily find a subject and reports findings on it.
> Had you read and digested the Hutton report in it's entirety before
> making a single post on this topic?
I watched the entire statement by Hutton, which as it covered in summary the main points, was enough to begin with. I've also been makng my way through the report and the index of the report is pretty clear meaning you can easily find a subject and reports findings on it.
So then Bell; after your gracious acceptance of my apology, I'd like to ask a question;
You're criticising others for not having the report. Your first posts on this thread were just over an hour after the report was released. Therefore, I'd like you to clarify the following point:
Had you read and digested the Hutton report in it's entirety before making a single post on this topic?
You're criticising others for not having the report. Your first posts on this thread were just over an hour after the report was released. Therefore, I'd like you to clarify the following point:
Had you read and digested the Hutton report in it's entirety before making a single post on this topic?
Jackus wrote:
> p01. !<3113. 0 VVn3l)!
>
> (Pot. Kettle. Owned.
L33T Rule #1: Don't use asci crap if you feel the need to translate it for people.
> p01. !<3113. 0 VVn3l)!
>
> (Pot. Kettle. Owned.
L33T Rule #1: Don't use asci crap if you feel the need to translate it for people.
Page: