Viewing Thread:
"Tony Blair "very angry" that Prime Minister leaked Hutton Report"

Well, it looks like he got away with it, anyway.

I don't think anybody is too surprised that a Tony Blair appointee didn't find fault with Tony Blair but, still, it's annoying.

Roll on a proper inquiry into Iraq.

Belldandy wrote:

> We can carry on this nitpicking for as long as you like but I'm sure
> you, and others, would rather get back to the actual topic...

Mwah ha ha ha ha ha haaaa! What, you mean like you mewling "Why are you agreeing with Flockhart!?!" when I clearly wasn't?

Not only a gutless coward, but a wailing hypocrite too. No wonder you're held in such high regard...

Only of the main points SO FAR. No one outside of the political parties and BBC and Kelly family knew the entire reports summary findings until the moment Lord Hutton finished that last sentence. And unless unknown kernel is one of the above named parties then there is no way in hell he knew what it actually said...

Carry on, I expect your usual reply.

For god's sake: I started a thread, consisting of two throwaway lines based on a report in The Sun. It wasn't meant to be an in depth analysis of The Hutton Report, I just wanted to start a thread about it and so I did, an hour before the thing was released. There is plenty of discussion here about the report itself so why not concentrate on that?

Belldandy wrote:
> Only of the main points SO FAR. No one outside of the political
> parties and BBC and Kelly family knew the entire reports summary
> findings until the moment Lord Hutton finished that last sentence.
> And unless unknown kernel is one of the above named parties then
> there is no way in hell he knew what it actually said...

Hehehehehe....Bell, are you saying that it was wrong to respond to something before having been in possession of all the facts of the summary?! I wouldn't be surprised as we all know you ALWAYS wait until being fully informed before wading in. Just like you did in the Rush Limbaugh thread....

Have you demonstrated your hypocrisy enough for one day, or is there more?

>
> Carry on, I expect your usual reply.

Would that be the one where I address the points raised? As opposed to your approach of running and hiding?

unknown kernel wrote:
There is
> plenty of discussion here about the report itself so why not
> concentrate on that?

Cos Bell will have to admit he doesn't know what he's talking about...

You wish.

I am rubber, you are glue!!!!!