The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well, it looks like he got away with it, anyway.
I don't think anybody is too surprised that a Tony Blair appointee didn't find fault with Tony Blair but, still, it's annoying.
Roll on a proper inquiry into Iraq.
I don't think anybody is too surprised that a Tony Blair appointee didn't find fault with Tony Blair but, still, it's annoying.
Roll on a proper inquiry into Iraq.
Page:
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Do you chaps never get typer's cramp?
If I've got a few hours one sunday and have bought quite a lot of pornogra....... oh .... TYPERS cramp..? No, never
> Do you chaps never get typer's cramp?
If I've got a few hours one sunday and have bought quite a lot of pornogra....... oh .... TYPERS cramp..? No, never
Can i just make a suggestion.
It seems Bell, Light and others have 'hijacked' this, and other threads. I'm not saying they did it on purpose or anything, but its just one of those things. X says this, Y sais that, X replies, Z jumps in, and before you know it, we're all off the origional topic.
Anyway, perhaps you can have a thread all on your own, where you can debate/ argue with each as much as you want. This will allow a thread, such as this one, to stay on track. Just an idea.
It seems Bell, Light and others have 'hijacked' this, and other threads. I'm not saying they did it on purpose or anything, but its just one of those things. X says this, Y sais that, X replies, Z jumps in, and before you know it, we're all off the origional topic.
Anyway, perhaps you can have a thread all on your own, where you can debate/ argue with each as much as you want. This will allow a thread, such as this one, to stay on track. Just an idea.
A fair point.
I've gotta apologise for dragging Bell through perfectly decent threads.
My bad
If we could have a "Your younger mates may think you know about things, but you haven't got a clue and we'll make sure you know it, you tool" forum, everyone'd be happy.
I've gotta apologise for dragging Bell through perfectly decent threads.
My bad
If we could have a "Your younger mates may think you know about things, but you haven't got a clue and we'll make sure you know it, you tool" forum, everyone'd be happy.
Belldandy wrote:
> Now, as much as I'd love to respond to Light, I fear that the majority
> of you would simply skip pass it and mark it down as another one of
> these customary spats.
>
> So instead I'll keep it short and simple.
>
> Light - no in fact anybody - find me where I say that the Hutton
> report validates the war. Light says that is what I am saying. So
> someone please find where I said it.
>
> Come one Light, no more messing around, find where I say it and quote
> the reply.
*waits*
So, despite several posts from Goatboy, all about as relevant to the topic as a goldfish, he nor Light still cannot find where I have said this. Strangely.
> Now, as much as I'd love to respond to Light, I fear that the majority
> of you would simply skip pass it and mark it down as another one of
> these customary spats.
>
> So instead I'll keep it short and simple.
>
> Light - no in fact anybody - find me where I say that the Hutton
> report validates the war. Light says that is what I am saying. So
> someone please find where I said it.
>
> Come one Light, no more messing around, find where I say it and quote
> the reply.
*waits*
So, despite several posts from Goatboy, all about as relevant to the topic as a goldfish, he nor Light still cannot find where I have said this. Strangely.
Plus, despite me clearly asking, Goatboy cannot actually produce the reference for his Ignatious comment.
Could it be I was actually right and even now he is scrabbling to find a new meaning?
Could it be I was actually right and even now he is scrabbling to find a new meaning?
No.
Bell, he promised Darwock he'd say nothing.
Besides, it's down to "argument technical errors".
"He said that I said when I really said..."
It's all off topic and not worth arguing about.
Back on topic, I agree with IB.
The report was never going to be bias free and people had already made up their minds what happened and just wanted the report to vindicate their story, otherwise they'd have an infinite amount of questions.
I can't comment on it because I've not read it but I still don't fully trust our government.
Besides, it's down to "argument technical errors".
"He said that I said when I really said..."
It's all off topic and not worth arguing about.
Back on topic, I agree with IB.
The report was never going to be bias free and people had already made up their minds what happened and just wanted the report to vindicate their story, otherwise they'd have an infinite amount of questions.
I can't comment on it because I've not read it but I still don't fully trust our government.
If Ignatius is the Ignatius I'm thinking of (and the more I read of Bell's posts the more think it is) then didn't he have a girlfriend or at least an ex-girlfriend? That would make some earlier comments possibly slanderous.
B*LL*CKS! he is a bloody liar if he says he is angry,he would have wanted it leaked if it cleared him.
personally i think hutton bottled it,he completely cleared the government when we all know they are guilty as hell.
the way they played a guessing game with his name was disgraceful,they admitted it and he still cleared them!
and if hoon gets away with his job that will just be the icing on the cake for the the most corrupt government i can think of(barring the republicans)
lets hope that no weapons are found in iraq,so blair can f**k off in disgrace.
personally i think hutton bottled it,he completely cleared the government when we all know they are guilty as hell.
the way they played a guessing game with his name was disgraceful,they admitted it and he still cleared them!
and if hoon gets away with his job that will just be the icing on the cake for the the most corrupt government i can think of(barring the republicans)
lets hope that no weapons are found in iraq,so blair can f**k off in disgrace.
Ha. Back on topic..!
Page: