The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml ?type=politicsNews&storyID=4106493
Page:
Belldandy wrote:
> So, where is this Rainbow Six game?
-------
Where is the thread and posts where "Goatboy is doing the same with anime"?
And you still, some 5 days later, have yet to answer my question regarding your "Nice Ignatious comment". The question where I ask you what I meant by that comment, and why you felt it was "nice".
Because, y'see, I'm saying that you're too stupid to understand that comment and just pretended to get it - and are now avoiding all mention of it because you simply cannot explain what you meant.
*taps fingers on desk*
I'll wait. And I fully expect to see you provide an excuse as to why you cannot "be bothered" or similar, or your usual method of completely ignoring an earlier comment when called upon politely to explain.
> So, where is this Rainbow Six game?
-------
Where is the thread and posts where "Goatboy is doing the same with anime"?
And you still, some 5 days later, have yet to answer my question regarding your "Nice Ignatious comment". The question where I ask you what I meant by that comment, and why you felt it was "nice".
Because, y'see, I'm saying that you're too stupid to understand that comment and just pretended to get it - and are now avoiding all mention of it because you simply cannot explain what you meant.
*taps fingers on desk*
I'll wait. And I fully expect to see you provide an excuse as to why you cannot "be bothered" or similar, or your usual method of completely ignoring an earlier comment when called upon politely to explain.
Belldandy wrote:
> So, where is this Rainbow Six game?
God, how DUMB are you?!
See my last post Bell; I was making it up in order to highlight just how ridiculous you look when you rant about subjects you know nothing about. Do you see? You know a lot more about Clancy's stuff than I, but I mentioned it cos I knew you'd get annoyed. Do you see? I got you annoyed to help you see just how ridiculous you look to everyone when YOU argue subjects which you know nothing about. Do you see?
> So, where is this Rainbow Six game?
God, how DUMB are you?!
See my last post Bell; I was making it up in order to highlight just how ridiculous you look when you rant about subjects you know nothing about. Do you see? You know a lot more about Clancy's stuff than I, but I mentioned it cos I knew you'd get annoyed. Do you see? I got you annoyed to help you see just how ridiculous you look to everyone when YOU argue subjects which you know nothing about. Do you see?
So, where is this Rainbow Six game?
Belldandy wrote:
> So, Light, have you got this new unique to you version of Rainbow Six
> or what?
>
> Because after you have whined at me for talking about Moore without
> having read him I'd hate to think you were doing the same regarding
> that game...as Goatboy is doing with anime also...
Dear oh dear...I'll leave aside the point that Goaty did no such thing for a moment, and I'll walk you through this....
1. You seem to think it's perfectly valid to slate something whilst knowing nothing at all about it.
2. Everyone else disagree's.
3. So, as I confess in my last post in this thread, I made something up about a game I know nothing about but which I was 99% sure you did.
4. You went off the scale with rage at this.
5. Thus showing that when someone else uses your rather silly argument techniques against you, you dislike it immensely.
6. Yet you still continue to use them yourself and insist nothing is wrong.
Or, to put it in even more simple terms, I was pointing out your immense hypocrisy, stupidity, intellectual inadequacy, and cowardice. All in all, I'd say I've been quite successful in that task too.
> So, Light, have you got this new unique to you version of Rainbow Six
> or what?
>
> Because after you have whined at me for talking about Moore without
> having read him I'd hate to think you were doing the same regarding
> that game...as Goatboy is doing with anime also...
Dear oh dear...I'll leave aside the point that Goaty did no such thing for a moment, and I'll walk you through this....
1. You seem to think it's perfectly valid to slate something whilst knowing nothing at all about it.
2. Everyone else disagree's.
3. So, as I confess in my last post in this thread, I made something up about a game I know nothing about but which I was 99% sure you did.
4. You went off the scale with rage at this.
5. Thus showing that when someone else uses your rather silly argument techniques against you, you dislike it immensely.
6. Yet you still continue to use them yourself and insist nothing is wrong.
Or, to put it in even more simple terms, I was pointing out your immense hypocrisy, stupidity, intellectual inadequacy, and cowardice. All in all, I'd say I've been quite successful in that task too.
"As Goatboy is doing with anime also..."
Where?
Do you mean the thread where I fully acknowledge I have a limited knowledge of anime and have no desire to watch more based on the handful I did see?
Or do you...nope, same thread, where I concede to your knowledge of something?
Or possibly you're refering to the comment yesterday where you blatantly didn't get the sarcasm of the "massive chickens" line?
And I'm still waiting for you to explain to me why my "Ignatious" line was "nice".
You'll never, ever win at one-upmanship Bell, but I'm happy to help you look repeatedly hamfisted in front of these good people, because I'm nice like that.
Where?
Do you mean the thread where I fully acknowledge I have a limited knowledge of anime and have no desire to watch more based on the handful I did see?
Or do you...nope, same thread, where I concede to your knowledge of something?
Or possibly you're refering to the comment yesterday where you blatantly didn't get the sarcasm of the "massive chickens" line?
And I'm still waiting for you to explain to me why my "Ignatious" line was "nice".
You'll never, ever win at one-upmanship Bell, but I'm happy to help you look repeatedly hamfisted in front of these good people, because I'm nice like that.
So, Light, have you got this new unique to you version of Rainbow Six or what?
Because after you have whined at me for talking about Moore without having read him I'd hate to think you were doing the same regarding that game...as Goatboy is doing with anime also...
Because after you have whined at me for talking about Moore without having read him I'd hate to think you were doing the same regarding that game...as Goatboy is doing with anime also...
Belldandy wrote:
> Light wrote:
> Just thought I'd let you know Bell, you still haven't answered...
>
>
> Now, we all know you're avoiding answering them because you're too
> dumb to actually string a coherhent argument together, but it's just
> amusing watching you twist and turn and go to extreme lengths to
> avoid answering it.
>
> Oh, your description of the Special forces earlier on: You've been
> playing Rainbow 6 an awful lot recently, haven't you? Cos that
> breakdown of special forces you gave in this thread...well, it looks
> a lot like one of the mission backgrounds to the original game.
>
> Really, wow you must have a special copy of Rainbow Six no one else
> has! Please send it me. Christ you clearly haven't even played
> Rainbow Six at all have you? As it is no game I know of actually
> allows you to play any scenario like that with any realism using
> combined assets. But hey, if you have that very special made up copy
> of Rainbow Six the gaming world would like to know about it...hell
> Rainbow Six only involves terrorists you moron.
Bwah ha ha ha ha haaaa! Ohhh, I'm sorry; I'm a bad man. I just like setting you off on a Clancyrant. Whenever anyone takes the name of Tom in vain, you get SO upset. Like now. Which is funny. So, for the record; no, I know it's nothing like Rainbow 6. But it was worth saying it was just to see your red-faced reaction. Aint I a stinker?
>
> Forget anything else, I gave you a proper answer and you dismiss it
> with comments which aren't even true. But hey, you're a liberal,
> that's like second nature.
Heh. You accusing someone of lying is like Stephen Hawking having a go at Timmargh for being wheelchairbound...
Really? You answered the question? Could you cut and paste that proper answer then? Cos I've read through this thread and you didn't give an answer at all. In fact, you avoided the question. C'mon Bell; are you going to cut and paste your response to these two questions:
- Why you're willing to believe this guy when he supports Bush, but
hate him when he doesn't.
- How his later statements contradict the initial one that "Bushis a blind man in a room full of deaf people".
> Light wrote:
> Just thought I'd let you know Bell, you still haven't answered...
>
>
> Now, we all know you're avoiding answering them because you're too
> dumb to actually string a coherhent argument together, but it's just
> amusing watching you twist and turn and go to extreme lengths to
> avoid answering it.
>
> Oh, your description of the Special forces earlier on: You've been
> playing Rainbow 6 an awful lot recently, haven't you? Cos that
> breakdown of special forces you gave in this thread...well, it looks
> a lot like one of the mission backgrounds to the original game.
>
> Really, wow you must have a special copy of Rainbow Six no one else
> has! Please send it me. Christ you clearly haven't even played
> Rainbow Six at all have you? As it is no game I know of actually
> allows you to play any scenario like that with any realism using
> combined assets. But hey, if you have that very special made up copy
> of Rainbow Six the gaming world would like to know about it...hell
> Rainbow Six only involves terrorists you moron.
Bwah ha ha ha ha haaaa! Ohhh, I'm sorry; I'm a bad man. I just like setting you off on a Clancyrant. Whenever anyone takes the name of Tom in vain, you get SO upset. Like now. Which is funny. So, for the record; no, I know it's nothing like Rainbow 6. But it was worth saying it was just to see your red-faced reaction. Aint I a stinker?
>
> Forget anything else, I gave you a proper answer and you dismiss it
> with comments which aren't even true. But hey, you're a liberal,
> that's like second nature.
Heh. You accusing someone of lying is like Stephen Hawking having a go at Timmargh for being wheelchairbound...
Really? You answered the question? Could you cut and paste that proper answer then? Cos I've read through this thread and you didn't give an answer at all. In fact, you avoided the question. C'mon Bell; are you going to cut and paste your response to these two questions:
- Why you're willing to believe this guy when he supports Bush, but
hate him when he doesn't.
- How his later statements contradict the initial one that "Bushis a blind man in a room full of deaf people".
Goatboy wrote:
> "Nice little Ignatious"
> Explain it then. C'mon Captain Fantastic, tell me what I meant by
> that.
I know! I think! Do I get a prize?
> "Nice little Ignatious"
> Explain it then. C'mon Captain Fantastic, tell me what I meant by
> that.
I know! I think! Do I get a prize?
Light wrote:
> Just thought I'd let you know Bell, you still haven't answered...
>
> - Why you're willing to believe this guy when he supports Bush, but
> hate him when he doesn't.
>
> - How his later statements contradict the initial one that "Bush
> is a blind man in a room full of deaf people".
>
> Now, we all know you're avoiding answering them because you're too
> dumb to actually string a coherhent argument together, but it's just
> amusing watching you twist and turn and go to extreme lengths to
> avoid answering it.
>
> Oh, your description of the Special forces earlier on: You've been
> playing Rainbow 6 an awful lot recently, haven't you? Cos that
> breakdown of special forces you gave in this thread...well, it looks
> a lot like one of the mission backgrounds to the original game.
Really, wow you must have a special copy of Rainbow Six no one else has! Please send it me. Christ you clearly haven't even played Rainbow Six at all have you? As it is no game I know of actually allows you to play any scenario like that with any realism using combined assets. But hey, if you have that very special made up copy of Rainbow Six the gaming world would like to know about it...hell Rainbow Six only involves terrorists you moron.
Forget anything else, I gave you a proper answer and you dismiss it with comments which aren't even true. But hey, you're a liberal, that's like second nature.
> Just thought I'd let you know Bell, you still haven't answered...
>
> - Why you're willing to believe this guy when he supports Bush, but
> hate him when he doesn't.
>
> - How his later statements contradict the initial one that "Bush
> is a blind man in a room full of deaf people".
>
> Now, we all know you're avoiding answering them because you're too
> dumb to actually string a coherhent argument together, but it's just
> amusing watching you twist and turn and go to extreme lengths to
> avoid answering it.
>
> Oh, your description of the Special forces earlier on: You've been
> playing Rainbow 6 an awful lot recently, haven't you? Cos that
> breakdown of special forces you gave in this thread...well, it looks
> a lot like one of the mission backgrounds to the original game.
Really, wow you must have a special copy of Rainbow Six no one else has! Please send it me. Christ you clearly haven't even played Rainbow Six at all have you? As it is no game I know of actually allows you to play any scenario like that with any realism using combined assets. But hey, if you have that very special made up copy of Rainbow Six the gaming world would like to know about it...hell Rainbow Six only involves terrorists you moron.
Forget anything else, I gave you a proper answer and you dismiss it with comments which aren't even true. But hey, you're a liberal, that's like second nature.
Just thought I'd let you know Bell, you still haven't answered...
- Why you're willing to believe this guy when he supports Bush, but hate him when he doesn't.
- How his later statements contradict the initial one that "Bush is a blind man in a room full of deaf people".
Now, we all know you're avoiding answering them because you're too dumb to actually string a coherhent argument together, but it's just amusing watching you twist and turn and go to extreme lengths to avoid answering it.
Oh, your description of the Special forces earlier on: You've been playing Rainbow 6 an awful lot recently, haven't you? Cos that breakdown of special forces you gave in this thread...well, it looks a lot like one of the mission backgrounds to the original game.
- Why you're willing to believe this guy when he supports Bush, but hate him when he doesn't.
- How his later statements contradict the initial one that "Bush is a blind man in a room full of deaf people".
Now, we all know you're avoiding answering them because you're too dumb to actually string a coherhent argument together, but it's just amusing watching you twist and turn and go to extreme lengths to avoid answering it.
Oh, your description of the Special forces earlier on: You've been playing Rainbow 6 an awful lot recently, haven't you? Cos that breakdown of special forces you gave in this thread...well, it looks a lot like one of the mission backgrounds to the original game.
Page: