The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml ?type=politicsNews&storyID=4106493
Page:
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Ever thought that perhaps he's baiting you as he knows it'll get a
> response?
Oh I know it. I quite like it when Light assumes it's him doing it, all part of his superiority complex.
> Ever thought that perhaps he's baiting you as he knows it'll get a
> response?
Oh I know it. I quite like it when Light assumes it's him doing it, all part of his superiority complex.
Belldandy wrote:
> 1) Anime is NOT cartoons.
>
> Your continued reference to anime as cartoons is proof enough you are
> talking about something you have zero knowledge of.
Ever thought that perhaps he's baiting you as he knows it'll get a response?
> 1) Anime is NOT cartoons.
>
> Your continued reference to anime as cartoons is proof enough you are
> talking about something you have zero knowledge of.
Ever thought that perhaps he's baiting you as he knows it'll get a response?
Belldandy wrote:
> 1) Anime is NOT cartoons.
>
> Your continued reference to anime as cartoons is proof enough you are
> talking about something you have zero knowledge of.
....which he has admitted to NUMEROUS times.
> 1) Anime is NOT cartoons.
>
> Your continued reference to anime as cartoons is proof enough you are
> talking about something you have zero knowledge of.
....which he has admitted to NUMEROUS times.
I'd call anime a cartoon...
But I'm not exactly an expert either.
I liked Dragon Ball Z though. :-)
But I'm not exactly an expert either.
I liked Dragon Ball Z though. :-)
1) Anime is NOT cartoons.
Your continued reference to anime as cartoons is proof enough you are talking about something you have zero knowledge of.
Your continued reference to anime as cartoons is proof enough you are talking about something you have zero knowledge of.
Goatboy wrote:
> Where is the thread and posts where "Goatboy is doing the same
> with anime"?
--
And how is this baiting?
I'm asking a perfectly reasonable and polite question for you to point me in the direction of where I said anything about anime other than "I haven't watched that much because I didn't enjoy the ones I have seen".
Seems you are unable to do that for obvious reasons (one being I've never claimed knowledge of anime beyond 4 or 5 films I didn't enjoy)
That's not baiting, that's asking you to quantify claiming that I've been lording it about talking about anime, as your original dig suggested.
> Where is the thread and posts where "Goatboy is doing the same
> with anime"?
--
And how is this baiting?
I'm asking a perfectly reasonable and polite question for you to point me in the direction of where I said anything about anime other than "I haven't watched that much because I didn't enjoy the ones I have seen".
Seems you are unable to do that for obvious reasons (one being I've never claimed knowledge of anime beyond 4 or 5 films I didn't enjoy)
That's not baiting, that's asking you to quantify claiming that I've been lording it about talking about anime, as your original dig suggested.
Belldandy wrote:
> If I reply you say I googled it. If I don't you say I don't know.
> This is evident from your own post below.
--------
Goatboy wrote:
"And I fully expect to see you provide an excuse as to why you cannot "be bothered" or similar"
There you go.
It's like I peered into the future or something.
I made a comment, you acknowledged it.
I asked you what you meant with your reply, you are unable to tell me.
And the response is exactly as predicted.
It's just a simple answer Bell. "Just tell me why it was a nice comment"
But you can't. But instead of saying "Actually, I don't know", you come up with some rubbish excuse.
You should have an adoption certificate you get owned so often.
> If I reply you say I googled it. If I don't you say I don't know.
> This is evident from your own post below.
--------
Goatboy wrote:
"And I fully expect to see you provide an excuse as to why you cannot "be bothered" or similar"
There you go.
It's like I peered into the future or something.
I made a comment, you acknowledged it.
I asked you what you meant with your reply, you are unable to tell me.
And the response is exactly as predicted.
It's just a simple answer Bell. "Just tell me why it was a nice comment"
But you can't. But instead of saying "Actually, I don't know", you come up with some rubbish excuse.
You should have an adoption certificate you get owned so often.
Belldandy wrote:
> You're going to have to find another fish to bait.
Why? You bite every time, so....
>
> If I reply you say I googled it. If I don't you say I don't know.
> This is evident from your own post below.
So why bother to even reply to this one? Oh, that's right; cos you want to come up with an excuse for avoiding the question.
Bell, your evasiveness and cowardice continue to amaze and impress.
>
> Light, oh Light....where's this Rainbow Six game? Deary me....
Bwah ha ha ha haaaa...okay, slowly now Bell; read this, and see if you can figure out why I mentioned the Rainbow 6 thing. Cos at the moment, you're making yourself look dumb in that you're attempting to be sarcastic after having missed the point. Despite having that point explained to you. Twice. So....
1. You seem to think it's perfectly valid to slate something whilst knowing nothing at all about it.
2. Everyone else disagree's.
3. So, as I confess in my last post in this thread, I made something up about a game (Rainbow 6) I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT (I'll emphasise that as you need all the help you can get) but which I was 99% sure you did.
4. You went off the scale with rage at this.
5. Thus showing that when someone else uses your rather silly argument techniques (of criticising something which you have no knowledge of) against you, you dislike it immensely.
6. Yet you still continue to use them yourself and insist nothing is wrong.
Or, to put it in even more simple terms, I was pointing out your immense hypocrisy, stupidity, intellectual inadequacy, and cowardice. All in all, I'd say I've been quite successful in that task too. Doubly so now that you're still trying to embarrass me using something which was only put there to humiliate you in the first place. For someone who says he's not a fish to be baited, you sure gobble down those hooks, lines, and sinkers.
> You're going to have to find another fish to bait.
Why? You bite every time, so....
>
> If I reply you say I googled it. If I don't you say I don't know.
> This is evident from your own post below.
So why bother to even reply to this one? Oh, that's right; cos you want to come up with an excuse for avoiding the question.
Bell, your evasiveness and cowardice continue to amaze and impress.
>
> Light, oh Light....where's this Rainbow Six game? Deary me....
Bwah ha ha ha haaaa...okay, slowly now Bell; read this, and see if you can figure out why I mentioned the Rainbow 6 thing. Cos at the moment, you're making yourself look dumb in that you're attempting to be sarcastic after having missed the point. Despite having that point explained to you. Twice. So....
1. You seem to think it's perfectly valid to slate something whilst knowing nothing at all about it.
2. Everyone else disagree's.
3. So, as I confess in my last post in this thread, I made something up about a game (Rainbow 6) I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT (I'll emphasise that as you need all the help you can get) but which I was 99% sure you did.
4. You went off the scale with rage at this.
5. Thus showing that when someone else uses your rather silly argument techniques (of criticising something which you have no knowledge of) against you, you dislike it immensely.
6. Yet you still continue to use them yourself and insist nothing is wrong.
Or, to put it in even more simple terms, I was pointing out your immense hypocrisy, stupidity, intellectual inadequacy, and cowardice. All in all, I'd say I've been quite successful in that task too. Doubly so now that you're still trying to embarrass me using something which was only put there to humiliate you in the first place. For someone who says he's not a fish to be baited, you sure gobble down those hooks, lines, and sinkers.
http://www.ignatiushistory.info/
Ho ho, not really.
Ho ho, not really.
You're going to have to find another fish to bait.
If I reply you say I googled it. If I don't you say I don't know. This is evident from your own post below.
Light, oh Light....where's this Rainbow Six game? Deary me....
If I reply you say I googled it. If I don't you say I don't know. This is evident from your own post below.
Light, oh Light....where's this Rainbow Six game? Deary me....
Page: