Viewing Thread:
"What an unbelievable moron"

http://www.nypost.com/seven/ 12292003/business/14640.htm

GTA is now 'digital snuff porn' according to this writer for the New York Post. Check it out, it's actually very amusing in a Daily Mail, red-faced angry parent kind of way.

and shouldn't the parents be to blame for 14 and 16 year olds playing an 18 game?

I hate it how idiots use the game as a scapegoat when you'd have to be mentally fragile in the first place to actually believe that you can committ said crimes and do said things in REAL life. You'd have to have a very incorrect perception of reality, and therefore, mental instability, something which should be spotted by doctors, family, friends or whoever.

He's looking fpor a reaction, and that's what he's got.

Real journalism = http://www.cube-europe.com/news.php?nid=5931

(by me, of course)

'Out of that company is spewing the glorification of mass murder and the celebration of death. And the fact that the game supposedly can't be sold to anyone under 17 years of age is completely irrelevant and changes nothing.'

Yes, because......

1) Guns are easily available in the USA, unto which actions such as those in GTA can easily be taken
2) All youngsters are totally impressionable drones with no sense of moral perception
3) Films are never, ever, guilty
4) Questioning a game that is evidently popular, rather than core social concerns of education, gun control and ethics is really just a waste of time.

Heh, good stuff. I can't believe how stupid people can be, the fact that he can't understand "Kill the Haitians" isn't some sort of racial attack shows that he's a complete and utter retard.

He's made a takeover bid, and with god's massive losses in the last quarter (he should've never given so many people free grants to heaven), he might just own it soon.

He ruling the world yet?

New York Post > News International > Sun

Good old Murdoch.

He's just the kind of reactionary, knee-jerking goober that gives journalism a bad name. If he'd actually read his statement about child pornography back to himself before it was printed, he hopefully would have realised it was quite a monstrous thing to say. That people like this can write for the New York Post astounds me.

Some people think they have a right to censor. Well censor this you d##k ###er m##########er ##### #### d### ####.

Or not :0D