The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you wouldn't, why not?
I just can't get my head around it. Confusing.
> The only thing that makes it any difference is the prior knowledge
> that your previous body would be destroyed.
Good point....
Are you you? To you you are you, to everyone else you are still you, even though the original you was destroyed, the replical you is still very much you becaue it IS you in every way.
The only thing that makes it any difference is the prior knowledge that your previous body would be destroyed.
> No, look at it this way. You're replicated and deleted in the same
> instant, and so, all you will ever actually feel is being transported
> from your entry point to wherever you are replicated.
-------
No it's not. You're being replicated, but you're not controlling that body. YOU are dead. Deleted. Gone. The copy is exactly that, a copy. Like I said before, if you weren't deleted, you wouldn't be controlling both bodies would you?
------
> The new consciousness is identical to yours, the memories identical.
> It is still you, even though you are dead.
------
To everyone else it's you. But it's not you, you're dead. Simple as that.
Worked perfectly.
Memores/emotion etc, but what about the little mole on your right little toe? One could say that is quintessentially and forever will be 'you', even though it could be replicated...
The new consciousness is identical to yours, the memories identical. It is still you, even though you are dead.
I don't see the problem.
-------
But it wouldn't be YOU. Example - let's say it DIDN'T delete the original - you. Would you be in control of both bodies? No, of course not, you'd be in control of the one you're in now. The other may look, sound and act like you, but you're not controlling it - it's not you.